Alabama law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody
of a child in a divorce case because the court believes both parents should be permitted the ability to develop and maintain a meaningful relationship with their child despite the end of the marriage.
Not exact matches
In my
case, I was
divorced because it was necessary for our physical safety
of myself and our only
child.
Because of the second tiebreaker rule (residence), the parent who has legal custody
of a
child is generally the parent who gets to claim the
child in cases of divorced or separated parents.
In addition to the custodial and child support issues you'll face if you have kids, there could be very serious financial ramifications for you, because the court only divides assets and debts in the case of a divorce or separatio
In addition to the custodial and
child support issues you'll face if you have kids, there could be very serious financial ramifications for you,
because the court only divides assets and debts
in the case of a divorce or separatio
in the
case of a
divorce or separation.
In the case of this attachment - related pathology of a child rejecting a parent surrounding divorce, the family is unable to successfully transition from an intact family structure to a separated family structure because of the aberrant and pathological processing of sadness by the narcissistic / (borderline) personality parent, who is then triangulating the child into the spousal conflict through the formation of a cross-generational coalition with the child to stabilize the collapsing personality structure of the narcissistic / (borderline) parent, which is collapsing in response to the rejection and abandonment inherent to the divorc
In the
case of this attachment - related pathology
of a
child rejecting a parent surrounding
divorce, the family is unable to successfully transition from an intact family structure to a separated family structure
because of the aberrant and pathological processing
of sadness by the narcissistic / (borderline) personality parent, who is then triangulating the
child into the spousal conflict through the formation
of a cross-generational coalition with the
child to stabilize the collapsing personality structure
of the narcissistic / (borderline) parent, which is collapsing
in response to the rejection and abandonment inherent to the divorc
in response to the rejection and abandonment inherent to the
divorce.
The noncustodial parent can not claim the credit
because even
in the
case of divorced or separated parents the household must actually be the principal place
of abode
of the taxpayer / claimer and
child.
The Traditional
Divorce Settlement model looks different
in different
cases but tends to be more pared down than Collaborative
Divorce, usually
because the parties have a very uncomplicated financial estate, they do not have
children together, there are no potentially problematic emotional / relational issues at play between the parties, or some combination
of all three.
The reason why
children are often at risk as a result
of divorce is
because in many
cases they are constantly being exposed to unnecessary conflict between their parents.