Sentences with phrase «of a degree celsius»

This is primarily because light bulb filaments must be extremely hot — thousands of degrees Celsius — in order to glow in the visible range and micro-scale metal wires can not withstand such temperatures.

At least two studies have been published since 2010 that suggest reducing soot and methane would cut human - caused global temperature increases by half of a degree Celsius, or about 1 degree Fahrenheit, by 2050.

Every 2 years on average, they found, the stratosphere suddenly warms by several tens of degrees Celsius.

Brown says the gel responds to temperature changes as small as one - thousandth of a degree Celsius.

The study found that after the initial decrease of solar radiation in 2020, globally averaged surface air temperature cooled by up to several tenths of a degree Celsius.

The front end has a plasma torch that gets up to many thousands of degrees Celsius, as hot as the sun's surface.

This form of energy is created from nuclear fusion reactions that take place at millions of degrees Celsius, but Mr. Fusion appears to work at room temperature.

The following relation converts this scale to the scale of degree Celsius (℃).

Existing electronic skins can sense temperature changes of less than a tenth of a degree Celsius across a 5 - degree temperature range.

The Philippines» Mount Pinatubo, for example, cooled Earth by a few tenths of a degree Celsius for months after it blew its top in June 1991.

After reanalyzing data collected between 1979 and 2001, the team found that the tropospheres temperature has risen by about two tenths of a degree Celsius (almost one third of a degree Fahrenheit) each decade, bringing it in line with the surface trend.

The extremely high temperatures — hundreds of millions of degrees Celsius — cause fusion to occur between hydrogen atoms in the plasma, releasing tons of energy.

These experiments heat electrically charged plasma to tens of millions of degrees Celsius and confine it with magnetic fields to make the atomic nuclei — or ions — in the plasma merge and release their energy.

PPPL studies how to recreate this process in the laboratory by heating plasma to tens of millions of degrees Celsius and confining it in powerful magnetic fields.

The relatively cool dark regions have temperatures of thousands of degrees Celsius, in contrast to the bright glowing gas flowing around the sunspots, which have a temperature of over one million degrees Celsius.

The WMAP image reveals temperature fluctuations (shown as color differences) differing by one - millionth of a degree Celsius.

It's difficult, for instance, to convey the critical nature of climate change in terms of ocean temperatures rising a couple of degrees Celsius (a figure I use here only to make a point).

The details differ (mostly within the uncertainty bounds given by Mann et al, so the difference is not significant), but all published reconstructions share the same basic features: they show relatively warm medieval times, a cooling by a few tenths of a degree Celsius after that, and a rapid warming since the 19th Century.

Climate scientists Pat Michaels and Chip Knappenberger of the Cato Institute used a climate model emulator that was developed with the support of EPA to determine that complete adoption of the CPP would have resulted in a temperature reduction of less than two one - hundredths of a degree Celsius by the year 2100.

One I have recently submitted feedback on is «Global surface air temperatures rose three - quarters of a degree Celsius (almost one and a half degrees Fahrenheit) in the last century, but at twice that amount in the past 50 years.»

[12] In fact, using the Model for the Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Induced Climate Change developed by researchers at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, even if all carbon dioxide emissions in the United States were effectively eliminated, there would be less than two - tenths of a degree Celsius reduction in global temperatures.

[13] In fact, the entire industrialized world could cut carbon emissions down to zero, and the climate impact would still be less than four - tenths of a degree Celsius in terms of averted warming by the year 2100.

Using a climate calculator and model developed by the EPA, climatologists Paul Knappenberger and Pat Michaels project that the EPA's climate regulations will mitigate 0.02 of a degree Celsius warming by the end of the century.

It raised global temperature by a third of a degree Celsius, and then settled down into the present hiatus / pause.

NOAA said Earth averaged 56.08 degrees (13.38 degrees Celsius) in February, 2.18 degrees (1.21 degrees Celsius) above average, beating the old record for February set in 2015 by nearly six - tenths of a degree (one - third of a degree Celsius).

In three years it raised global temperature by a third of a degree Celsius and then stopped.

They got that way because there was a step warming immediately after the super El Niño appeared which raised global temperature by a third of a degree Celsius and then stopped.

The eighties and nineties were shown as a warming, with temperature rising a tenth of a degree Celsius per decade.

We talk about warming in terms of degrees Celsius and gigatons of carbon burned.

Schellnhuber similarly puts that number at a few tenths of a degree Celsius under this scenario.

In four years it raised global temperature by a third of a degree Celsius and then stopped.

Yet according to official climate models, even if the U.S. enacted an immediate and total ban on all human emissions of greenhouse gases, the difference in global temperature by the year 2050 would be a mere five one - hundredths of a degree Celsius.

The March 2010 global mean temperature was affected by about 2/100 of a degree Celsius, well below the margin of error (about 15/100 of a degree for monthly global means).

Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), operated by the European Centre for Medium - range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), calculated the global average August temperature was nearly two - tenths of a degree Celsius higher than the previous August temperature records set in 2015, in their dataset dating to 1979.

The three major groups calculating the average surface temperature of the earth (land and ocean combined) all are currently indicating that 2014 will likely nudge out 2010 (by a couple hundredths of a degree Celsius) to become the warmest year in each dataset (which begin in mid-to-late 1800s).

If the current 17 - year trend continues, the oceans would warm by an almost unmeasurable one - tenth of a degree Celsius by year 2100.

Plugging in 100 percent emission reductions by industrialized nations by 2100 while postulating maximum climate sensitivity yields a temperature reduction of 4 / 10ths of a degree celsius (rounded up).

One third of a degree Celsius is half of what has been allotted to the entire twentieth century.

Meanwhile a research arm of European Centre for Medium - range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Copernicus Climate Change Service, said that the global average July temperature was one - fifth of a degree Celsius higher than previous July temperature records in their database dating to 1979.

As shown in the WRE paper (Nature v. 379, pp. 240 - 243), the differentials at the global - mean level are so small, at most a few tenths of a degree Celsius and a few cm in sea level rise and declining to minuscule amounts as the pathways approach the SAME target, that it is unlikely that an analysis of future climate data could even distinguish between the pathways.

In February 2016, Carl Mears and colleague Frank Wentz published a peer - reviewed paper that adjusted upwards the satellite - derived temperatures for the upper atmosphere since 1998 by as much as 0.2 of a degree Celsius.

Are you somehow gifted with second sight so that you just «know» precisely what GAST was (within the tenths of a degree Celsius necessary to support all of the vast range of conclusions that are being made about global warming and its causes) so that you can state that it was in fact cooler?

About 1/3 of a degree Celsius per century (+ / -??

Now, given that the least significant digit of the input data is integer 1, or for later data integer 5, then how do you calculate a «result» based on this data has a GREATER accuracy than the input data — specifically, the claim that this calculated «global mean temperature» has increased by fractions of a degree celsius, and typically reported to the 0.00 degree accuracy.

With polar regions excluded, 2017 becomes the third warmest year, and the «global» warming relative to the base period is reduced by almost a tenth of a degree Celsius.

And the two plateaus are not t the same level: The current one is a third of degree Celsius higher than the earlier one on the left was.It got that way because in 1999, immediately after the super El Nino left, there was a quick but intense step warming.

In only three years it raised global temperature by a third of a degree Celsius and then stopped, having established the current level pof the plateau.

The 1997 - 98 super El Niño was enough to boost global temperatures by nearly a quarter of a degree Celsius.

The problem is that whatever temperature signal they carry is of questionable resolution, and is commingled with whatever myriad of other factors that influence coral growth rates, or the relative populations of differing microfauna, or Isotope ratios in dissolved gases trapped in ice, or the growth rate of trees... None of these issues would lead any rational person to view the application of these proxies in determining climatological fluctuations on the order of fractions of a degree celsius annually.

«The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) own computer model easily shows that President Obama's proposed regulations would reduce global warming by around 0.02 of a degree Celsius by the year 2100.