Sentences with phrase «of a former spouse who»

Not exact matches

The funds can come from multiple sources and even multiple people - maybe a spouse who will also be part of the business or former co-workers who were also laid off and are looking for a new opportunity.

If your former spouse is caring for your child who is under age 16 or disabled who gets benefits on your record, they will not have to meet the length - of - marriage rule.

In addition, the Starbucks College Achievement Plan education benefit expanded to provide partners who are current or former members of the U.S. Armed Forces with an additional tuition - covered education to extend to a spouse or child.

Another book, Donna Sinclair's The Pastor's Wife Today (Abingdon, 1981), speaks of the toll of divorce, citing one former clergy spouse who said, «Every time I prayed, I would see the vision of a back door.

Mangano — who is scheduled to go on trial, along with his spouse, Linda, and former Oyster Bay Supervisor John Venditto March 12 — has pleaded not guilty to federal charges of conspiracy, bribery and wire fraud.

We've got» 000's of testimonials from former members who met their spouses while part of our matchmaking service.

One method of running the study would be to simply sample the American population at random, hoping that a significant number of people who had gotten divorced met their former spouses on an online dating site.

Former Office star Melora Hardin has been tapped for a guest role on ABC's new drama Killer Women, TVGuide.com has learned exclusively.Hardin, who also recurred on USA's Monk, will play Nan Reed, the long - suffering spouse of a yahoo husband who... Read more

Into the middle of this bog stepped Merryl H. Tisch, a former 1st - grade teacher with an EdD from Teachers College, Columbia University, and a spouse, James Tisch, who heads Loews Corporation and has sometimes appeared on the Forbes 400 list of the richest people in America.

If you are the spouse or former spouse of the participant who receives a distribution from the Plan under a QDRO, you generally have the same options the participant would have (for example, you may roll over the distribution to your own IRA or an eligible employer plan that will accept it).

A widow, widower or un-remarried former spouse of a USAA member who joined USAA before or during the marriage

Conceivably, this could include a separated, but not yet divorced, former spouse who «expects» to take all of your furniture in the divorce.

You are caring for a child who is under age 16 or disabled, and who gets benefits on the record of your former spouse.

In addition, an alternate payee who is a spouse or former spouse can roll the distribution over into his or her individual retirement account (IRA) without tax consequences if the rollover is done within 60 days of receiving the QDRO distribution.

The annuity varies depending on the number of children and whether or not there is a surviving spouse or former spouse who is a parent of the children.

Under innocent spouse tax relief, innocent spouses can be relieved of paying tax, interest and penalties caused by a spouse or former spouse who omitted or wrongly reported items on a tax return.

In 1984, «Litigation» (the former title of this column) rediscovered the Queen's Proctor was still alive when Sir John Arnold, President of the Family Division, rescinded three decrees nisi based on unreasonable behaviour in favour of petitioners who had sworn special procedure affidavits falsely deposing that they and their spouses were not living together.

It was Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 that provided a mechanism for someone who has not remarried or entered into a civil partnership to bring a claim in England and Wales against a spouse or former spouse even if a court has already made a financial order in divorce proceedings in another jurisdiction.

If followed by unknowing wives and their lawyers it will be a charter for cheats; for wives who can not seek advice on the evidence of their former husband's disclosure will be unable to apply to set aside decisions made by their dishonest spouses.

Telfer v Henry Estate 2013 ONSC 303, involves a situation where the court imposed a constructive trust on the insurance proceeds of the deceased, who had entered into a separation agreement with his former spouse agreeing to pay child maintenance, but failed to do... Read more

(e) On July 2, 2004, the Applicant obtained real estate transaction documents pertaining to the wife of her former spouse from the office of the lawyer who was representing the wife, and used those documents in her family law proceedings;

Family relationships covered by the definition of «family member» in the PAFVA include current and former spouses, adult interdependent partners, others residing (or formerly residing) in intimate relationships, persons who are parents of one or more children, regardless of whether they have ever lived together, persons who reside together where one of them has care and custody over the other under a court order, and generally, those related to each other by blood, marriage, adoption, or adult interdependent relationships, as well as children in the care and custody of the above persons (PAFVA section 1 (1)(d)-RRB-.

Definition — «child of the marriage» --(s. 2 (1)-RRB- child of two spouses (former spouses), even if one parent is not the biological parent (but stands in loco parentis) who at the time is:

Parties who know that a former spouse does business on a cash - basis may be able to locate the former spouse's «second set of books,» or records of the spouse's cash transactions.

Loco parentis — spouse or former spouse who «stands in the place of a parent» (s. 2 (2) of the Divorce Act (step - parent) / assumes the role of a parent

The Respondents were members of the family of Maria Altagracia Dorval, who was murdered by her former spouse in October 2010.

Sometimes you hear about Family litigants for whom their dispute against the former spouse has taken on a life of its own, and who will not stop until they have literally exhausted every possible legal and procedural avenue.

If that single person on title emerges from the relationship and sells the house, that could potentially expose the purchaser to legal action, says Jacqueline Boucher, who practises family and estates law with Cox & Palmer in Saint John, N.B. «You could end up in a situation where the former spouse who was left out of the transaction brought the purchasers into litigation to establish their claim.»

(b) «Intimate relationship» means a relationship between spouses, former spouses, past or present unmarried couples, or persons who are both parents of the same child regardless of whether the persons have been married or have lived together at any time.

Family members — including adult children or stepchildren, as well as former spouses who have not remarried — of a current or former USAA member

Likewise, the company services family members — including widows, widowers, and un-remarried former spouses of USAA members who had USAA auto or property insurance while they were married.

Widows, widowers and former spouses of USAA members who have or had a USAA auto or property insurance policy while married

Conceivably, this could include a separated, but not yet divorced, former spouse who «expects» to take all of your furniture in the divorce.

As a former military spouse, I like to think I have a better perspective than most on how challenging it is for service man and women who are in the job search and transitioning out of the military.

The emotional and psychological wear and tear on the mother, who, even if she has a cooperative former spouse, often transforms the custodial mother into an enervated and exhausted bundle of nerves.

One of the most common situations in relocation cases happens when the custodial parent, who has physical custody of the child and shared legal custody, wants to relocate the child a distance from a former spouse, who has visitation rights... Continue reading →

«In this book, Lauren Behrman and Jeffrey Zimmerman have given divorcing parents a remarkable resource for «radical acceptance» of one's former spouse as he or she actually is — the starting point for putting aside attachment to who is right and who is wrong, and instead cultivating the conditions in oneself for doing the best possible job of minimizing conflict and maximizing good parenting.

A therapist who sees a remarried couple when one of the partners was in counseling with the same therapist with their former spouse.

When considering discussing a divorce modification with your former spouse, it can be helpful to work with a mediator who can help you consider the implications and effects of the changes, and if necessary, draft an amendment or addendum to your original agreement.

In second marriages, the climb becomes even steeper when a spouse finds himself caught, for example, between the financial demands of a former wife, who is the custodial mother of his children, and his new wife, who believes the first wife is just being greedy.

Research has shown that individuals who feel guilty have a difficult time letting go of their former spouse and often have problems developing new intimate relationships after the divorce.

This is due to the resistance they meet from the former spouse, who has often formed a new relationship and wishes the new partner to take over the role of father.

When the full - blown parental alienation dynamic exists the pathology is more intractable: It is a campaign of denigration against the former spouse who abandoned him / her.

Former spouses who have been through Collaborative Divorce are able to co-parent more peacefully because the process of divorce itself is focused on working through the issues with respect, dignity and honesty.

Parents who are not married may also face challenges, as the thought of co-parenting with a former spouse or partner may seem impossible.

In a recent trial court opinion issued by the Superior Court in Hudson County, Judge Gallipoli recognized that parents in NJ may have a right to collect damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress when their relationships with their children are poisoned by former spouses or even grandparents who partake in alienating behaviors.