Sentences with phrase «of a free society if»

Not exact matches

If we don't stop the rapidly growing influence of government over private sector activity, we will squander America's unmatched capacity to innovate and create a standard of living and free society that are the envy of the world.»

If you haven't read Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty - First Century, if you haven't read The Zero Marginal Cost Society [Jeremy Rifkin's account of how extreme gains in productivity are disrupting capitalism by rendering many goods and services almost free], you can not even have a conversation with me about what the future is holdinIf you haven't read Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty - First Century, if you haven't read The Zero Marginal Cost Society [Jeremy Rifkin's account of how extreme gains in productivity are disrupting capitalism by rendering many goods and services almost free], you can not even have a conversation with me about what the future is holdinif you haven't read The Zero Marginal Cost Society [Jeremy Rifkin's account of how extreme gains in productivity are disrupting capitalism by rendering many goods and services almost free], you can not even have a conversation with me about what the future is holding.

If the federal and state governments come in and slap new regulations and oversight on these companies, it's their own fault for practicing elitist arrogance in an attempt to shape a specific narrative that damages the very fabric of a society where the first amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the rights of free expression and free speech.

If you are true to the bible and not biased by stereotypes of today's society, then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.

A society that says — you're free... to be like me... or be different, but just do it somewhere far away... and don't remind us of it... and if you do, we'll come after you and demonize you.

Even if the human person is most himself and freest when least encumbered with social, traditional, religious or familial ties, society is a necessary evil which protects as much as possible the freedom of the individual without being much of a threat to it.

If you want our societies to degenerate into a dog - eat - dog free - for - all that ruins everything, then don't use your natural gift of empathy and just look away whenever you encounter suffering.

A person can not be free in his own person, nor can he contribute to the freedom of others, if he is at liberty not to learn what he needs to know to be a responsible and participating member of society.

The conclusion to be drawn from Riezler's treatment of public opinion is that true community must be re-established in mass society if that society is to remain a free one which serves the people.

Moreover, a properly governed free market is indeed an important form of economic organization, at least in a complex society, and reliance on it would be impossible if the resulting differences in distribution were canceled.

How can it claim to bridge the divisions in human society — divisions between Greek and barbarian, bond and free, between white and black, Aryan and non-Aryan, employer and employed — if, when men are drawn into it, they find that another division has been added to the old ones — a division of Catholic from Evangelical, or Episcopalian from Presbyterian or Independent?

Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 34) A nexus enjoys «personal order» if two conditions are fulfilled: (1) it is a «society» and (2) the genetic relatedness of its members orders these members «serially.»

Yet, if there really has been an inversion of morality in our society, it is questionable how «free» that decision really is.

As if this were not cheeky enough, the unelected and unchallenged «president» Raúl Castro also claimed that he was committed to building «a prosperous and sustainable socialism focused on human beings and the family, and with the free, democratic, conscious and creative involvement of the entire society.»

A God whose purpose it is to develop a society of free persons must forego some knowledge [foreknowledge] and some power if he is to attain his purpose.

Moreover, in addressing «the nature of the academic calling» (as they significantly still put it), the AAUP argued that «if education is the cornerstone of the structure of society and if progressing in scientific knowledge is essential to civilization, few things can be more important than to enhance the dignity of the scholar's profession...» Scientific knowledge and free inquiry thus gained near - sacred status.

I do not know whether some sort of decentralized democratic socialism can supply a healthier economic base for the kind of change that seems necessary if we are to continue as a society of free men and women.

If society can be war and decease free for a reasonable period of time, then you'll see the changes more dramatic.

Inherent in Christian understandings of the realities of the human condition and of what personhood might be if it were set free to flourish, and in Christian understandings of society and church, is a strong stress on human sociality and an equally strong resistance to the ways in which individualistic views of personhood erode or deny sociality.

This forum is giving me a very good idea what cynics and atheists sound like, and while I cant know if there is a God I do know a truly free society respects freedom or lack of religion and that believers of both should learn some respect and toleration.

I don't know if my question has more to do with history of US and its culture and society (perhaps in some other country or at some other time in future it's atheists who are pro free enterprise and the religious being against), or with human psychology?

O'Neill framed her talk around the complicated relationship between the rights to privacy and free press, emphasising that the debate between these two key features of democratic societies fails to adequately show how claims of privacy and calls for press freedom are to be weighed against one another if and when they come into conflict.

If they fail, due to lack of education and life chances, they're told they are living in free societies, where everybody has the potential to succeed.

What are they if not vested interests and who will hold them to account in this vision of a society cut free from government constraints?

«If things remain as they are - without dialogue between the electoral commission and political parties over the electoral process, as well as between the commission and civil society and the international community - and elections go on as planned, the result could be violence,» Jerome Bonso, chairman of the National League for Free and Fair Elections, told IRIN in Kinshasa.

That even if you don't understand, how important it is, net neutrality is literally the basis of the new... free... society.

He explained though the African continent has improved in several areas including governance, freedom of speech among others, surge in number of free media and civil society organizations a lot more can be done if African is given the space.

Unencumbered by human frailties, Curiosity — like the rovers Spirit and Opportunity, which survived on the Red Planet years longer than expected — will be free to hunt for E.T. «If we find evidence for life on Mars, boy, are we just gonna go wild with speculation about how common it is in the universe,» says Lou Friedman, a former scientist with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena and cofounder, with Carl Sagan, of the Planetary Society.

Don't you think people freed from the constraints of a clock - based economy and society are more likely to go a little Mad Max, especially if they have to buy their clothes on Etsy?

It would be nice if Hillary Clinton reexamined her education agenda and reflected on the importance of America's public schools in a free, democratic society.

If your Nook Color explodes during experimentation, you're free to pursue a life of amoral crime and misdirected acts of vengeance against society.

If you don't have one already, get a free alert sticker from San Diego Humane Society to put on a visible window of your home.

FREE spay for your mother cat or dog In an effort to cut down on the number of people who continually bring in litters of puppies or kittens from the same mothers, the Greater Androscoggin Humane Society will spay the mothers if the kittens or puppies are brought to the shelter.

If you can't afford the cost of routine vaccinations, contact your local shelter or humane society to ask about free or low - cost vaccine clinics in your community.

You must be a Certified TNR Caretaker if you are working with feral and stray cats to qualify for the free and low - cost clinic services offered by the ASPCA, The Toby Project, and The Humane Society of New York.

If the Society had to pay for these facilities, staff and other services that are donated free of charge, it would cost many thousands of dollars which the Society does not have.

If you can't afford the cost of your dog's vaccinations, contact your local shelter or humane society to ask about free or low - cost vaccine clinics in your community.

What's more, The Humane Society of the United States maintains a list of national and local organizations that offer not only free pet food, but low - cost spay / neuter services, and temporary foster care if you need help.

If you are considering opting out of mainstream society to become a global or digital nomad, then house sitting is a great way of finding free temporary accommodation within a homely environment.

Today, these artworks wield an ever greater urgency as a reminder of how prejudices, if allowed free range, can cripple a society.

If you're sincerely interested in the scientific case for AGW, you can't really do better than to start with this free 36 - page booklet published jointly by the US National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of the UK: Climate Change: Evidence and Causes.

Please feel free to address the observations yourself or to request help from the Presidents of the US National Academy of Sciences, the UK Royal Society, the UN's IPCC, or the editors of Nature or Science — if you can get them to come out of hiding!

Some still try to claim that the perceptions / evaluations of wealth today will naturally continue to grow into the future if more people are freer to believe what they want and do as they please (the fantasy that good results will be produced by a less regulated free - for - all society / marketplace).

If fossil fuels were made to pay their costs to society, costs of pollution and climate change, carbon - free alternatives might supplant fossil fuels over a period of decades.

It's worth listing the specific steps they suggested that relate to scientists, specifically their effort to develop a «white list» of approved scientists for media quotes — so, if a media PR organization develops a list of scientists who will repeat their talking points, and then someone else does a study that exposes this list, and people complain about «blacklisting scientists in a free society» — no, that doesn't hold much water, does it?

First, if one accepts that the obligation to acknowledge one's duty to «promote equality, diversity and inclusion generally» is a form of compelled speech, then it's hard to see how such an obligation can be justified under section 1, given that no such obligation actually exists — hard to see how an obligation to acknowledge a non-existent obligation is a reasonable limitation that can be justified in a free and democratic society.

If their work is suddenly made «free,» all of society is likely to suffer.»

Today the BC Law Society's Ethics Committee provided an opinion that this practice is acceptable with certain conditions, however, if a lawfirm funds expenses beyond disbursements (ie clients medical costs, client out of pocket expenses etc) they must do so on an interest free basis unless they send the clients for independent legal advice first.

A limitation of the free movement of EU - citizen diplomats would then only be allowed when there is an actual and present danger to their security which therefore can not be guaranteed (with an analogy to its case - law on infringements to free movement by expulsion, which is only allowed if the personal conduct of the EU - citizen forms a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society., cf. the Orfanopoulos - case, par.

So if you're going to take us from what we used to call a free society to a society in which the US government keeps a list of everybody every American knows, what should be the constitutional procedure for doing this?