Sentences with phrase «of a gay couple as»

It says NOTHING about the loving respectful relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

That scripture is talking about RAPE and has NOTHING to do with the loving saved respectful relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Nowhere in your bible does your god condemn the saved loving respectful relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Nowhere in your bible did your «jesus» condemn the loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Yo moron they use that same tactic today straight men rape other men to show their dominance it has nothing to do with the loving respectful long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

I realize you have reading comprehension problems but nowhere in your bible does your god condemn the saved loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Your god does NOT condemn the saved married partnership of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Yo moron, read number 23 they were worshiping a pagan god using sex it has NOTHING to do with a long term loving relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Nothing you wrote there has anything to do with the loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it to be normal today, which is what this subject is about.

You very good at cherry picking the bible to fit your prejudice and bigotry but this has nothing to do with the long term loving relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

They are about rape, worshiping a pagan god using sex, male prostitution, idolatry, none of it has to do with the loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Your Christ does not condemn a saved loving respectful relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand sexual orientation today.

All you are doing Spoc aka Bob is showing how much you don't know about reading comprehension 101 because when the scriptures are put into historical context, nowhere does it condemn the saved loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

No, only prejudice bigots like you read that into the bible, nowhere does it condemn the long term loving relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

st Corinthians 6:9 - 10 — the word homosexual was added later by a prejudice scribe, most scholars will tell you it's about male prostitution and nothing in there is about the saved long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Again moron it has to do with RAPE — it has nothing to do with the loving respectful long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

I agree with the other poster you took the cowardly way out it you are truly gay, because nowhere in the bible does your god condemn the saved loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Not exact matches

After that, the researchers tracked the eye movements of the participants as they looked at and rated the pleasantness of images of gay male and heterosexual couples.

The duo also scored a lot of free publicity in Atlanta by playing up the «local boys make good» angle of their story as well as the idea of a gay couple starting a company together.

The men were told to look at the images for as long as necessary to make their judgments, and longer time spent looking specifically at the faces and bodies of the gay male couples was taken by the researchers as another sign of attraction to men.

Relatively faster performance when the task involved moving the manikin toward the gay male couple was taken as a sign of implicit attraction, rather than aversion, toward homosexual men.

As far as the rights for gay and lesbian couples, again, this is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICAs far as the rights for gay and lesbian couples, again, this is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICas the rights for gay and lesbian couples, again, this is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

As Sullivan puts it, there is «more likely to be a greater understanding of the need for extramarital outlets between two men than between a man and a woman; and again, the lack of children gives gay couples greater freedom.»

If marriage is a cornerstone of our society, aren't gay couples that want to be married affirming the value on monogamous commitment as the building block of healthy and sustainable families and communities?

And when it comes to «family values,» we're weary of battles to «protect» marriage from gay couples, when so many young evangelicals have grown up in broken homes, witnessing our parents divorce and remarry at rates just as high as in the non-evangelical world (more than 33 % of marriages among born - again Christians end in divorce, the same as in the general population).

From all the research I've seen, children of gay couples develop and grow up to be just as normal as those of straights.

New York's recent legalization of gay marriage is being hailed by many as a watershed moment in the history of the fight for equal rights for same sex couples.

Some Protestant leaders are striving to broaden the church's ministry to include the growing plurality of family forms — to include as coequals with the intact nuclear family all single - parent families, the divorced and remarried, blended families, childless couples, unmarried couples living together, and gay and lesbian couples with or without children.

Once we recognize the common thread running through the major elements of the passage — Zeus and Ganymede, Sodom, and the gay and lesbian couples — the entire passage coheres as a unified whole.

They could disapprove all they want, but gays could have the same legal protections (AND responsibilities, of course) as any straight couple.

Take, for instance, last summer the State of Illinois revoked Catholic Charity's adoption and foster care licensebecause Catholic Charities didn't comply with the «Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act,» which says gay couples must be treated the same way as heterosexual couples.

I have visions now of angry Southerners blocking gay couples from entering the courthouses to marry just as they did with blacks who wanted to vote.

One of the main arguments used by advocates of gay «marriage» is that the current definition of marriage (as pertaining exclusively to man and woman) breaches the principle of equality and thus discriminates against same sex couples.

Do you realize that heterosexual couples engage in many of the same acts as gay couples do?

Though remember that in the minds of people of faith that marriage validates the s e xuality of the couple, and so they infer that to condone gay marriage is the same thing as condoning gay s e x.

If there is an inherent «right to marriage» for same - sex couples, religious groups that refuse to marry gay couples are violating their civil rights, which in turn could lead to a repeal of the churches» tax exempt status» or a complete overturn in our law and culture of the religious understanding of marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

Years before the nation's capital legalized same - sex marriage in March, one church in Washington, D.C., opened its doors to gay couples as part of its mission to establish an «inclusive body of Biblical believers.»

The Daily Mail opposes it for as many of the right reasons as it is now possible for a secular paper to admit to: «This legislation,» it said, «which not even Stonewall, the most persistent gay rights group, was agitating for, is not just about allowing homosexual couples to have a wedding rather than a civil partnership.

just a couple of sad as #bandits wishing for a gay world ain't ya....@Derrick

I'm a 55 year old male married to a gal who came out as gay a couple of years of ago.

And the Trumps» arrangement may even be more transparent than the couples who wed with all the faith and hope of having a loving, equal partnership only to be deceived later because hubs always knew he'd put his career above his wife's, or he knew he was gay but married anyway because it's what he thought he should do, or she's been hiding a huge amount of debt (as 1 in 5 of us do).

A month ago, a couple of weeks after posting an article about Caitlin's long road to recovery, with the help and support of her mom, Barbara, from post-concussion syndrome, and after Caitlin came out as gay, I asked her whether she would help MomsTEAM develop out the section of our site on parenting LGBT youth athletes.

If you factor in the ending of gay and lesbian relationships (since such couples can't be legally married, they can't be legally divorced and thus don't get counted in these statistics), as well as committed but unmarried heterosexual couples, the numbers grow... more

And yet even though the number of states allowing gays to adopt a baby has nearly tripled over six years, for many same sex couples hopeful adoptive couples such as Matthew and Trey there's still a long way to go.

PGS for gay couples helps determine if any of the embryos have extra or missing chromosomes, known as aneuploidy, or if any chromosomes have translocated, which means a piece of a chromosome has broken off and reattached itself to a different part of the chromosome or even to another chromosome.

It allows gay and lesbian couples to enjoy the same rights as straight couples in the eyes of the law.

CapTon's Kaitlyn Ross confirms the Bronx Democrat was asked — and confirmed — that his issue is indeed the provision that would allow gay couples married outside the state to file their state income tax returns as a married couple, regardless of whether or not they can file their federal returns in the same manner.

In short, the provision would allow gay couples married outside the state to file their state income tax returns as a married couple, regardless of whether or not they can file their federal returns in the same manner.

Supporters of the amendment expressed irritation when culture secretary Maria Miller said it could function as a «wrecking amendment» to the gay marriage bill — an accusation she last used yesterday, albeit with more justification, on demands for civil ceremonies for heterosexual couples.

Moreover, as Professor Leslie Green shown in a recent programme at the British Academy (Gay Marriage: Prospects and Realities, 29 May 2012), marriage offers a number of advantages not offered by same - sex civil partnerships, including portability of status, a broader understanding of the couple's status, as well as the potential for religious recognition, depending upon the religious group involved.