Sentences with phrase «of a heated argument with»

10) In the middle of a heated argument with your spouse, abruptly sit down (preferably on the ground, especially if you're in public), cross your legs into lotus pose, close your eyes and stop responding.

The first incident was the result of a heated argument with another student that got Antonio worked up to the point he emotionally shut down.

Not exact matches

Chief of Staff John Kelly got into a heated argument with President Trump and threatened to quit, Axios reported Saturday.

This is because, even if you have a heated argument, as long as you keep in the back of your mind that the people you're arguing with do have the best in mind for the company and wider team, you'll always be able to make it to the end and remain friendly.

Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go back to church again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.

The decade between the cloning of Dolly the sheep and the election of Barack Obama was rife with heated public arguments about embryo research, cloning, assisted reproduction, and other matters bioethical.

Eric: Please don't confuse unity and tolerance with the lack of argument, debate, heated discussion, or even bad language.

@ grassroots: I would like to believe that you were sincere in claiming that atheists have a ``... duty (as if being responsible to some authority) to debunk...» (I presume you to mean a belief in God) ``... via the Internet... [etc]», but when you mix sarcasm with rationality, then you lose creditability with me because you join the ranks of those who just want to poke fun at believers for entertainment and invite a heated argument with no intentions of converting such people.

nakedpastor said, on December 10th, 2009 at 2:36 pm Eric: Please don't confuse unity and tolerance with the lack of argument, debate, heated discussion, or even bad language.

I'll never forget sitting in the living room of a family from my old church, engaged in a heated argument with several straight, married couples about whether or not one could be both a follower of Jesus and gay.

Kind of like getting into a serious and heated argument with someone that believes in Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny... beyond illogical.

Prosecutors say Bibi, a 45 - year - old field worker, insulted the Prophet Mohammed after she got into a heated argument with Muslim co-workers who refused to drink from a bucket of water she had touched.

Some of his most heated arguments were with these people.

If we grow out these seeds, the observable characteristics of the resulting pods will be near identical (for the sake of argument, let's say we get lucky and our cross is orange with purple spots, is Jalapeno shaped and has the heat and flavour of a Habanero — in reality this will never happen.

Dez Bryant made no apologies for the heated argument he had with Jason Witten at the end of the Cowboys» loss to the Lions on Sunday.

Many kids leave home in the heat of an argument with their parents or after some major event.

That caused a heated argument with some of the toffs.

Signing, shaking hands, shooting the shit, engaging in political discourse with the American People, OK maybe having one or two heated arguments with an occasional fucking dicktard who apparently needs to turn an animated conversation into a fistfight because that's just the kind of self - medicating ballsack he is, I can't say any more right now according to my lawyer.

But one of the things that sustains you in this job is the sense that yes, our politics is full of argument and debate, and it can get quite heated, but no matter how difficult the decisions are, there's a great sense of British fair play, a quiet but prevailing sense that most people wish their Prime Minister well and want them to stick at it and get on with the job.

A day after one of his aides got into a heated argument with a TV reporter over his refusal to take questions on homelessness, de Blasio insisted his administration had an open door policy with both the press and the public.

Like the fact that you never ever have anyone else to hand off to in the heat of an argument with your truculent teen, divvy up carpooling duties with, or give you a Sunday morning in bed.

The stress amounts to illnesses, a fractured mind leaving him questioning his own political beliefs, and a few nasty heated arguments with his girlfriend, all of which make for fascinating entertainment.

Interestingly, Jarvis was spotted by a casting director while having a heated argument with her boyfriend (and father of her newborn baby) on a railway station platform.

Frank's heated argument with a supermarket manager frightens Ally so much that she becomes afraid of her grandpa.

The wild hairstyles and costumes of the capital have been replaced with a sea of grey jumpsuits (none take this harder than Elizabeth Banks» ostentatious Effy Trinket) and much of the action is more in the style of heated board room arguments than firefights.

It put a strain on his marriage to Dena (Gabrielle Union), who is now engaged to a new guy, and on his relationship with his son Thomas (Octavius J. Johnson), who is nabbed from Vincent's car in the middle of a heated father - son argument.

After having a heated argument with his mother, he's lured into taking a babysitting job caring for the kids of Mrs. Pedulla: the stern and studious Slater (Max Records), no - nonsense wild child Blithe (Landry Bender) and Mafia-esque exchange student Rodrigo (Kevin Hernandez).

At an event last month I saw a former governor at one of the schools in a heated argument with one of the new trustees who had taken over.

There is a lot of heated argument about whether ebooks will replace printed books, the heat generated almost exclusively by people with their own monetary interests in pushing one over the other.

- takes place at a prestigious academy located on an isolated island - protagonist is Tenma Wakakoma, who doesn't get along well with his Medabot partner - after a heated argument, he walks back home depressed and ends up meeting the Roborobo Team by accident - he decides to follow them and ends up in a fight involving the group and a mysterious Medabot - Tenma manages to fend off the evil group, but he doesn't know is that an old man witnessed the whole thing - several days later, he receives a mysterious letter that tells him he has been selected to enter the prestigious academy - he even received a scholarship for it - Tenma accepts and enrolls in the academy - the academy is a place where the richest and most influential Medabot battlers train - the academy is located on a large, exhausted Medalia mine - rumors say there's still a large, undiscovered Medalia vain underground - total of 290 Medabots - revamped battle system allowing for swapping of Medabots parts during battle

This doesn't contradict the argument that, given present amounts, doubling CO2 should cause stratospheric cooling even without solar heating of the stratosphere (with the effect in the far wings being the opposite, and with the effect at the center of the band being restricted towards TOA).

When a group of people claiming superior scientific knowledge and understanding refuses to grasp the extremely simple point I've been making regarding the heating capacity of an absence of volcanic eruptions, then I am forced to take all their other arguments with a huge grain of salt.

With or without global warming, there's a solid argument that improved understanding of planetary dynamics, particularly the climate system, is essential to sustaining human progress given how risks rise as populations expand, build, farm and concentrate in zones that are implicitly vulnerable to hard knocks like floods, droughts, heat and severe storms.

The» top ten» arguments employed by the relatively few deniers with credentials in any aspect of climate - change science (which arguments include «the sun is doing it», «Earth's climate was changing before there were people here», «climate is changing on Mars but there are no SUVs there», «the Earth hasn't been warming since 1998», «thermometer records showing heating are contaminated by the urban - heat - island effect», «satellite measurements show cooling rather than warming») have all been shown in the serious scientific literature to be wrong or irrelevant, but explaining their defects requires at least a paragraph or two for each one.

Those with deep - rooted fears of direct harm to water, health or property values will never be persuaded with arguments built around the overarching logic for gas as a cleaner option in humanity's long climb up Loren Eiseley's «heat ladder» from dung and firewood toward a sustainable energy future.

lastly, a point that I made in arguments is that 70 % of the IR radiated by CO2 hits the ocean and is used up in latent heat transfer associated with evaporation.

@Web: The problem with your argument is that it presumes that there is not a statistical distribution of kinetic energies among the top-most water molecules, such that a certain percentage of them are within a single photon's energy of the heat of vaporization.

For example, because the mass balance argument says nothing about absolute numbers or attribution it may be that we are also — for example — destroying carbon - fixing plankton, reducing the breaking of waves and hence mechanical mixing with the upper ocean, releasing methane in the tundra which was previously held by acid rain and which can now be converted to CO2, or it may be we are just seeing a deep current, a tiny bit warmer than usual because of the MWP, heating deep ocean clathrate so that methanophage bacteria can devour it and give off CO2.

The picture in the top article above is one of a half dozen pictures that explicitly show that the an atmosphere with a thermal lapse in any direction you like is capable of doing work, because heat engines in the idealized world of thermodynamic arguments can run between any two thermal reservoirs.

It is also interesting to note that if, the second term in vanishes (making any temperature a «low» temperature as) and gravity does indeed behave like additional degrees of freedom in the specific heat of the entire system while every small subvolume of the gas still behaves precisely like an ordinary ideal gas with kinetic energy $ \ frac -LCB- 3 -RCB--LCB- 2 -RCB- NkT $ and yes, with detailed balance across any vertical surface (although yes, Joe, my argument involving shifting the MB distribution was sloppy and imprecise — hopefully you like this one better but the result is the same either way).

On blogs like Dr. Curry's I continually see learned, and heated, arguments over the meaning of fluctuations in the «annual temperature of the earth» in the hundredths of a degree range (sometimes thousandths), with data plotted over hundreds or thousands of years, while noticing that there doesn't seem to be a DEFINITION of the «Annual Temperature of the Earth» and that the climate science community, collectively, would be hard pressed to provide me with an «Annual Temperature of Bob's House» with a credible and defensible resolution and precision of + / -.01 degree, using an instrumentation system of their choice.

Prof Curry: While Chen and Tung's argument and mechanism is convincing, it is not at all clear to me from the paper that the amount of heat sequestered in the ocean is commensurate with the TOA radiative imbalance and the amount of heat that would be required to keep the surface temperatures from increasing in the presence of increasing anthropogenic greenhouse forcing.

While Chen and Tung's argument and mechanism is convincing, it is not at all clear to me from the paper that the amount of heat sequestered in the ocean is commensurate with the TOA radiative imbalance and the amount of heat that would be required to keep the surface temperatures from increasing in the presence of increasing anthropogenic greenhouse forcing.

Some replies to the questions you raised there: «While Chen and Tung's argument and mechanism is convincing, it is not at all clear to me from the paper that the amount of heat sequestered in the ocean is commensurate with the TOA radiative imbalance and the amount of heat that would be required to keep the surface temperatures from increasing in the presence of increasing anthropogenic greenhouse forcing.»

I am currently experiencing a heated argument with another poster on another website concerning Global warming and the validity of the IPCC report and its followers and their agendas, etc..

Repeat it, as often as you have, still confers zero - legitimacy (sorry Gavin) to the argument that trees are friendly thermometers, until 1960, Tom, your arguments provide heat, and humour, but your 0 Kelvin position continues to shower us with knegativity of knowledge!

Bearing in mind Rahmstorf's argument about using ocean heat content though, which of the stefans do you agree with most?

Even with that sort of reconstruction though, legitimate arguments are still possible for those different eras, but with each paper individually taking the heat (so to speak) for each time - window.

It might help you if you had a few concepds in mind too when considering this subject, like «space» is the big energy «sink» with old sol (and the internal heat generating processes (including nuclear) of the earth) as sources... any mechanism that results in a delay of energy leaving earth, such as a «bounce - back» or a re-rad of energy (like back radiation) certainly is going to increase the «energy flux» in the system, and this in any way you want to frame the argument translates to a «higher» energy state, and a higher so - called temperature» (movement in matter, velocity of air molecules or oscillations in certain «resonant molecules) as well.

So, the best way to put it is that the lapse rate is caused by the fact that the atmosphere is heated from below in concert with stability arguments based on buoyancy, adiabatic expansion, and the existence of convection.