Sentences with phrase «of a lot of historical»

ROBERT LUCKY: You can think of a lot of historical cases where people have been persecuted because their identities were made known.

It actually reminds me in, that sense, of a lot of historical fiction I have read.

Not exact matches

«A lot of Mexican players are looking to Canadians because of our historical strength in that sector,» says Nizzola.

In general, so - called value stocks — often defined as those trading at earnings multiples below the market average or their own historical norms — have tricked a lot of investors in the most recent phase of the current bull market, which has worn on nearly seven and a half years.

«There's a lot more upside potential than downside risk,» says David Elstone, an analyst with Gibsons, B.C. — based ERA Forest Products Research, who notes that those improved 2012 housing starts were still less than half of historical norms.

As a result of the weak recovery, the economy has lots of spare capacity, interest rates and valuations are well below historical averages, and corporate managements are exercising extreme risk - averse behavior.

Second, corporate profits are still high by historical standards, so businesses still have a lot of room to absorb wage increases before they would have to raise prices.

And while he was fuzzy on many details, giving lots of partial answers and promises to «follow up», one thing he did confirm was that Facebook board member Peter Thiel's secretive big data analytics firm, Palantir, is one of the companies Facebook is investigating as part of a historical audit of app developers» use of its platform.

I don't have historical data from when I first published my book but if you search Amazon Associates today and sort by books you'll find a lot of titles published in the last several years.

While there are lots of websites that offer realtime and historical Adwords Ad data, we'll focus on SpyFu in this example.

There's a lot of risk takers out there that just assume the stock market goes up and up and don't have a good historical grounding.

I know, a lot of people will say unsecured loans are just as risky as stocks but historical data on consumer credit proves otherwise.

In conclusion, The Road To Ruin does detail a lot of historical information on finance.

NIA looks like it has a lot of good information mixed with bad, but they're still a bunch of crackpots wailing about hyperinflation with little regard for the historical profligacies it takes to cause the levels they're afraid (or for a more modern example the comedic horror tale that is Venezuela).

While it has excellent charts and lots of historical information on prices through their exchange, one area where the software is lacking is in displaying the potential profit and loss of each trade that you conduct.

Also, it has lots of historical information and sophisticated charting tools featured in its interface, but if that is not enough, you can also use Binance Tools — a separate platform that expands on the functionality of Binance by adding such features as displaying potential profits and losses for each transaction you conduct.

The small city of fewer than 2,000 residents has a lot going on though, including rodeos, parades, its own historical museum.

This pattern, if likely on the extreme side with Jaume, is a shortcoming of a lot of Tocqueville scholarship — the scholars get lost in the fascinating historical context, and neglect the hard work that his texts invite and demand:

I guess you know that there are a lot of historical docu - ments beside the Bible which confirm the truth of Christianity.

We actually have a good bit of evidence - more than a great many known historical persons from the ancient world, and with a lot more detail.

Many may not agree with me, but religion has played a crucial role in keeping order in the society historically that is a lot more in magnitude than historical violence in the name of religion.

The Bible contains a lot of interesting stories, talks between people, between God (Jesus) and people, wisdom (proverbs), prophecy (revelation), words of salvation (the 4 gospels, the epistles), historical data, like dates, locations, names of people involved in the stories, parables, reports about miracles, Jesus did, songs, prayers, psalms etc...

There is, however, lots of evidence that certain historical facts in the Bible are true.

There is lots more — on contraception, on same - sex unions, on women, on the Second World War, and, going right back to basics, on the historical fact of Christ's existence.

The Lutheran view of the canon of the Bible is a view that involves a lot of judgment: — The Council of Trent's view that Spirit - led men selected the proper canon is rejected; — The need for historical evidences is also rejected as a criteria for judgment.

There isn't a lot of corroborating evidence in other historical texts to confirm these 400 things, so don't take one account as fact.

I also think I will enjoy your posts on Genesis 1, since I have done a lot of research on that chapter myself in its ancient historical context.

When you tell people you are questioning the creation accounts of Genesis 1 - 2, a lot of Christians get very angry, and some religious types will actually fire you from your job... What they don't realize is that you are simply using historical - cultural research to understand Genesis 1 - 2 the way Moses and the Israelites would have understood it.

There is a lot of historical background to this statement that we must understand as well.

It disturbs me that so many refuse to acknowledge the greatness of this nation and I respect criticism but historical ignorance is at an all time high and the USA seems to be the whipping boy of so many who do nt realize the fact that underlying this freedom we enjoy is a lot of blood.

I think you would really have to stretch things a lot to argue that there wasn't an actual person who was the root of the Jesus legend, but to say that everything outlined in the Gospels is a historical record of that person is something that very few scholars would claim, and I can't think of any who would try to argue that claims to godhood can be seen as historical evidence of actual godhood.

What I didn't get round to doing when I set out: lots of exegesis, lots of historical theology, mastering the big texts of the traditions of the church.

However, as with everything else, there is a lot of wiggle room when it comes to how much historical and cultural background studies help us understand the text.

Perhaps the lesson here is that, just as the Bible is made up of dozens of different types of literature — from historical narrative to doomsday prophecy to poetry — Bible movies lend themselves to a lot of different types of movies.

kermit4jc Actually, the Bible is just ONE place that says lots of things are historical, but the difference is that the Smithsonian can actually match it's findings to other sources.

If you are going to name your kid after a historical figure, England has lots of better names to choose from: Winston (Churchill), Charles (Darwin), Issac (Newton), William (Shakespear), John (Lennon), Oliver (Cromwell), Guy (Fawkes), Richard (III), Arthur (Wellsley or King if you prefer), and on and on.

Similarly, the head of the Oregon Historical Society was quoted as saying, «The fact that there has been no dominant religion has allowed a moral flexibility that a lot of states don't have.»

We need context and interpretation, and sometimes that means we need historical insight or other kinds of analysis that comes only from a lot of study.»

Actually there is a lot of evidence for the historical Jesus, even if you don't believe in His deity.

As with a lot if not all the Christian scriptures, there is a lot of historical failings and questions and that includes the supposed martyrdom of the apostles.

Like a lot of historical, «spiritual» figures.

Though most people would not think a church would make a good house, some of the older churches have a lot of style and historical character which is what some homeowners are looking for.

They have even less to do with the historical person Mary, the mother of Jesus, and are devastating to the fifty percent of the human race whose lot she shared.97

However one looks at Scripture, as the «word of God» or just old writings, understanding the historical and cultural context in which the writer's lived and wrote can give us lots of insight.

Saying that Jesus is a myth has a lot more merit because there's much less objective historical docu.ments on jesus unlike the various emperors of Rome.

Just to let you know, «historical» jesus was based on a lot of previous god myths including mine, I had been their and done that long before your jesus came along.

yes, there really are a lot of cultural and historical gaps to try to bridge in understanding Scripture, especially these violent texts of the Bible.

Although I'm an atheist, I accept the fact that this «cross» has historical significance and I understand why it would mean something to a lot of people to have it displayed.

This is what happens to legends — a lot of them have a historical basis but become embellished in their re-tellings.

@Chad There is a lot of historical evidence that Gilgamesh was a real King and that Uruk was a real kingdom.