I agree for the most part that politics should not be a focal point for a church, but the separation of church and state is to prevent the
formation of a national religion.
Here we were inducted into the
mysteries of our national religion, reasonable, surprisingly masculine for a faith that might at first glance seem soppy and weak, confident, and perhaps above all things unself - consciously beautiful.
[1] The Establishment Clause has generally been interpreted to prohibit 1) the establishment
of a national religion by Congress, or 2) the preference by the U.S. government of one religion over another.
But since our particular
variety of national religion usually employs terms identical with those of the Christian ethic and even with the faith itself, the issue is extremely confused.
The
standpoint of national religion appears in the utterances in which God's interests are identified with those of the people, when for example Israel's war is assumed to be God's war, Israel's honor God's honor, Israel's country God's country.
Furthermore, even when «civil contract» terminology is used in statute, it can not drive a wedge between the general and the ecclesiastical law of marriage: a union authorised by law must be recognised equally as a lawful union by the officers and
tribunals of the national religion (Thompson v Dibdin [1912] AC 533) except to the extent that parliament limits parishioners» rights in order to protect individual clerical consciences.