Sentences with phrase «of abortion on demand»

People can recognize that practice of abortion on demand leads to suffering, not just of the fetus but of others too.

The insistence by supporters of abortion on demand that only «wanted children» be allowed to be born has not improved our infant mortality rates, which have remained among the worst in the industrialized world; nor has it helped us cope effectively with the incidence of child abuse, the frequency and severity of which have increased dramatically during this time.

They are, therefore, understandably distressed that controversy continues to swirl around his determined efforts to explain how he can be both a faithful Roman Catholic and a proponent of abortion on demand.

Using this data, the team found that supporters of abortion on demand had, on average, fewer than two kids for every 2.5 born to parents who favored legal restrictions on abortion.

Many Americans refuse to recognize the horror of abortion on demand, many have gotten used to it, and a substantial number support it.

In Abuse of Discretion, the latest book lobbed at the unsteady edifice of Roe v. Wade, Clarke D. Forsythe turns to the Supreme Court justices» private notes and memos from 1971 to 1973 in order to «solve the puzzle» of the court's legalization of abortion on demand.

Thus some advocates of abortion on demand are now admitting that the fetus might very well be more than a part of the body of its mother but, nevertheless, because it is dependent on its mother for its life, she has the right to end that life if it interferes with the exercise of her own personal liberty.

Wait a minute... what's wrong with Christians trying to stop the legalization of abortion on demand and same sex marriages?

@Ed, «Wait a minute... what's wrong with Christians trying to stop the legalization of abortion on demand and same sex marriages?»

Not exact matches

They were celebrating the 50th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which granted American women the right to vote, but they were also protesting the limits and expectations placed on American womanhood, demanding changes to childcare and abortion policies and education and employment opportunities.

Podesta is for abortion, on demand, and its public financing (his candidate advocates disposing of the Hyde Amendment).

So in a country in which third trimester abortions are legal on - demand, our abortion discussion centers on questions like «So why are you against the removal of a tiny clump of rapist - produced cells?»

Brown eyes could be next, or blue; there's no reason in the theory of abortion - on - demand why not.

One thing making traditionalists of these young Americans, at least according to some of them, is the fact of their having grown up in a world characterized by abortion on demand.

As far as I know, he hasn't appealed to any of Jesus» teachings to support his position on embryo destruction, abortion on demand, partial birth abortion, or born - alive abortion.

• The promotion of easy - to - get divorces, abortion on demand, and lesbianism as acceptable lifestyle choices.

Though the Supreme Court is far from a consistent proxy issue for social conservatives or religious voters, it does provide a flashpoint for issues of religious liberty, traditional moral values, and abortion - on - demand.

Even before Roe v. Wade, he wrote and spoke against abortion on demand and served as president of the National Right to Life Committee.

Alias no restrictions would mean an underage girl could get an abortion, free of charge, on demand, without parental involvement or identificatio / notification of the father.

Guys, IMHO, no restrictions would mean an underage girl could get an abortion, free of charge, on demand, without parental involvement or identificatio / notification of the father.

Already there is talk of pressure to legalize abortion on demand and euthanasia — always described as voluntary euthanasia, of course.

Is it a belief that abortion on demand is a triumph of respect for individual moral autonomy?

We take God out of the courts out of schools we allow abortions on demand without a single question.

Is it a belief that abortion on demand is a form of legal anarchy which is eroding the moral fabric of Western civilization?

Within days of taking office, he was promoting the compatibility of soldiery and sodomy, and gleefully reversing very modest limitations on the abortion license - the latter on the very day of the annual pro-life march, and without the slightest acknowledgment that the great majority of Americans have deep moral anxieties about abortion on demand.

The UN bureaucrats, Scandinavian politicos, Clinton Administration «global affairs» mavens, radical environmentalists, feminists, and population controllers who planned the conference intended it to be nothing less than the Great Cairo Turkey Shoot: a political slaughter in which the enemies of «individual autonomy,» «sustainable growth,» «global carrying capacity,» «reproductive rights,» «gender equity,» abortion - on - demand, and the sexual revolution would be utterly, decisively routed.

The reason: «Proponents of abortion rights overcame Americans» qualms about the procedure with a long series of claims about the benefits of unrestricted abortion on demand.

Next, Balmer campaigns with evangelicals during the 1988 presidential election and observes their support of candidates Kemp and Robertson and their opposition to abortion - on - demand.

More than any other question in public dispute, abortion on demand is the core commitment of the American establishment.

«Federal taxpayer subsidies are helping pay for over 1,000 health plans that cover abortion on demand, and [last week's] Supreme Court decision underscores that only Congress can put a stop to that,» said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life Committee (NRLC).

That one action by Senator Kennedy paved the way for a judicial appointment that almost surely was the key to preserving a constitutional right to abortion on demand and to the overturning of U.S. laws protecting marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

At the time, 13 states had defunded Planned Parenthood by keeping Title IX funds from going to the organization, which is the nation's largest provider of on - demand abortions by far.

Patriotism demanded that the Germans submit, just as we are reminded that unless we submit to the ukase of the Court on the abortion decision, the Court's very legitimacy will come into doubt.

Abortion on demand, throughout the full nine months of a pregnancy, for virtually any reason, became public policy in the United States of America.

Unfettered access to abortion on demand has addressed none of women's true needs; nor has it brought dignity to women.

We can not help but remark that had the woman demanded a late - term abortion, she wouldn't be facing any legal troubles at all - which underscores the nutty convolutions of logic that abortion imposes on society.

More likely than not one of the next few federal elections will strongly favor the Democrats; this will not be a mandate for abortion on demand.

Liberty and Sexuality is his account of how abortion on demand came to enjoy the protection of the United States Constitution and of why Harry Blackmun's rationale for individual autonomy (especially in matters sexual) should be retained and expanded.

It was not long, however, before one woman's necessity turned out to be another's convenience, and abortion on demand became the order of the day.

Finally, there was Harold O. J. Brown, commenting in Christianity Today:» [Francis] Shaeffer asks whether Evangelicalism can tolerate in its fellowship those who are unwilling to condemn abortion on demand; [likewise] the inerrancy group is asking whether it can tolerate within its leadership those who will not affirm inerrancy» («Assessing the Church of the 1970s: A Decade of Flux?

As of mid-2013 only thirty - nine percent of those polled supported abortion on demand, indicating little movement since 1983.

We're in the way of abortion - on - demand, euthanasia, and doctor - assisted suicide.

Every abortion practitioner knows that the overwhelming majority of abortions are carried out on social grounds andthe abortion lobby is unapologetic about its belief that abortion should be available «on demand and without apology», yet it uses rape survivors as an emotive smokescreen to cover its unsavoury agendas and exploits their suffering for political and ideological gain.

The bad faith that can infect holders of this position becomes apparent when feminist cries of «femicide» and «previctimization» over the selective destruction of female embryos curiously lapse into silence at the random destruction of embryos (abortion on demand) or at multiple abortions (abortion as a contraceptive).

The deconstruction of marriage, abortion on demand, legalization of marijuana, acceptance of pornography, expansion of gambling, provisions for doctor - assisted suicide — progressives either endorse or refuse to speak up against these and other policies and trends.

In 1962 only 10 per cent of the population supported what is now called «abortion on demand.»

(Can those who champion abortion on demand worship without contradiction an emblem of fertility?)

In this area, as in others, a better approach would be to show the damage artificial contraception causes such as increased immorality, strains on marriage due to impossible demands regarding sexual gratification, increased abortion, legitimisation of homosexuality, sexualization of children, procreation without sex (e.g. IVF) and the moral decline and confusion experienced by protestant churches since they allowed artificial contraception.

To the Republican it is about control and restoring America to its Christian foundation, ending abortion on demand, restoring the sancti ty of marriage, reinstating school prayer, seeing that the various citizenry know their place and taking out the garbage.

From supporting taxpayer funding of abortion - inducing drugs under the HHS mandate, to advocating for abortion on - demand for any reason, Senator Gillibrand is part of the all - out assault on Life, conscience, and religious liberty.»