Not exact matches
@Yakobi try again,... how
about 1/3 fallen angels (now called demons) making up religions / as well as belief
of atheism to be worshiped directly / indirectly as God?
Signs
about God fly directly in the face
of atheism.
There is much that could be said
about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that
atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf
of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name
of atheism, seek to change laws in favor
of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination
of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support
of atheism, they prove that their
atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving
atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
This isn't
about that though, this is more a lesson in how both religion and
atheism together can be equally guilty
of scamming people out
of donations and book sales over trivial and distorted teachings.
Who cares
about your distorted ideas
of atheism when you can only prove you're insane?
If you require atheists to explain something physics directly tells you we can't talk
about right now, your burden
of proof for
atheism is oddly far more extreme than your burden
of proof for «god».
And TO the people that says religion is the cause
of wars, plz stop it, how
about all the wars from
atheism?
the fact that the respondant lies
about this being a political effort, proves that the platform
of atheism is built on a foundation
of lies.
Actually Jesus you're wrong
about what
Atheism said, prayer changes things by not doing anything and allowing the natural (disastrous) course
of events to transpire.
Religions just try to brainwash you
about minor things,
atheism tries to brainwash you
of the most obvious thing!
@edgelbraith — i assume you are talking
about your religion
of atheism and I have to agree that some
of you are very childish (in addition to being hateful, petty & devoid
of compassion for others) but I don't think it's fair to lump all
of you in a group like that.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool
of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking
about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence
of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how
Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden
of proof falls in your lap as it is the base
of your religion.
Atheism says absolutely NOTHING
about the cause, nature and purpose
of universe, mankind or purposeness.
The biggest publishing news
of recent years has been Everyday Saints (literally translated, Unholy Holy People), in which Archimandrite Tikhon (Shevkunov), head
of Sretensky Monastery and reputed spiritual counselor to President Putin, offers a series
of vignettes
about his journey from Marxist
atheism into Orthodox monasticism.
I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and
atheism provide examples
of lay persons talking
about a science they don't fully comprehend.
I think my question to those
of you who couple
atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you
about the details
of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?
I'm tired
of atheists making everything
about atheism.
I think my question to those
of you who couple evil
atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you
about the details
of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?
Atheism is simply a lack
of belief in god and says nothing
about how we raise our children (other than implying that we don't brain - wash them with religious indoctrination).
Dalahast; you said «I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and
atheism provide examples
of lay persons talking
about a science they don't fully comprehend.»
It proves that some people make a religion out
of atheism, but it doesn't prove anything
about all atheists.
«It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man's mind to
atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds
about to religion; for while the mind
of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain
of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity.»
Those who are Buddhists will follow one set
of laws, secular humanists on, Utilitarians on, Unitarian Universalists one (with a lot
of variation), etc. «
Atheism» in itself says nothing at all
about one's ethical beliefs.
I think
atheism will just come
about, as part
of the process.
@Clinton, You might be confused
about Atheism, it is simply a lack
of belief in god (s), not «believing in science.»
Atheism is for people that want to be right
about everything and can't admit there might be more to life than their limited perception
of the world.
Atheism is not a believe, it is an absence
of believe, and simplifying
of life that enables a clean good way to live without feeling bad
about lapses
of judgement.
its not really
atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking
about, you assume to know what something is
about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its
about being aware
of who you are?
I would put money that we will hear
of this guy a year from now when he is either selling a book or writing a dissertation to get into a University
about how God saved him from the big, bad
atheism.
If a Christian used that expression, we'd spend the rest
of the day reading
about how
atheism isn't active.
We don't say there are six types
of Theists, we focus on the Religions, and that is what is missing — a modern Religion / Belief system for Atheists — as
Atheism does not mean without rules, just
about whether God exists or not.
TheLies» comment above
about your post as usual conveniently ignores the critical point that crimes done by Stalin et al were not done under any guidance
of atheism, whereas the guidance to do the many atrocities that Christians have done can be found in the many horrific instructions «from god» presented in the Christian book
of nasty AKA the bible.
a cursory look at amazon will show you there are a great number
of books
about atheism spanning a wide range
of topics under that heading.
I post
about atheism, not to change the minds
of Christians, but to voice alternatives to religion, for the «undecided voters» who may be reading these comments.
I just really think that the simplistic counter-reaction is not enough — much
of what I read
about atheism and its adherents these days comes down to a pretty simple and straightforward ideology.
Atheism is
about being free to see the world as it really is, without the rose - colored glasses
of faith, without believing in a supernatural grandpa in the sky.
Atheism is actively denying the existence
of God, which is not inborn, first you hear
about this God and religion thing, and then you decide if you believe it or not, definitely NOT inborn.
I kind
of feel bad for this guy, only because
Atheism isn't «
about» anything.
His belief that all theological argument is (quite literally) «away with the fairies», and his optimism
about a harmonious world where religion has withered away, are the doctrines
of new
atheism.
A «group
of drunks» that atheists talk
about has nothing to do with the concept
of a supernatural being intervening in your life being regarded as something other than
atheism.
Don't worry
about what other Christians might be thinking
of me, you are giving a pretty good image
of atheism and gay lovers yourself.
Your
atheism is going down the drain, even some
of yours are turning to God now, if you don't believe me then just search CNN there was an article a couple
of days ago
about one that did.
No — we'd just have different levels
of atheism that we would fight
about.
Whether Christians bother
about it or not, the theme
of atheism concerns all equally.
Taking atheist statements
about religion and then substituting
atheism for religion generally results in nonsense; all
of your posts do that.
I'm glad to see you are honest
about it ROCKWOOD, but I think this comment — «The Muslim influx is a bit more difficult for me to accept, but I often pray that I have the ability to accept them as much as I accept other religions, or concpets
of relgions such as
Atheism, and Agnosticism..»
I think a lot
of people assume here that her writing this was to foster «
atheism» when in reality it was
about her surviving and thriving... finding her «own» path within the the highly dogmatic and structured religious organization known as AA.
Atheism takes for many something away that is essential to the fabric
of human life and we have to come to some decisions
about what is true, what is lovely and what is just and kind.
But let us not forget that when we confront
atheism, we are actually inquiring
about the destiny
of our generation as a whole.
If you have any further questions
about me and / or
atheism, please feel free to write me at
[email protected] Despite my moniker, I don't bite — most
of the time.