Sentences with phrase «of access to the court records»

And that irks Loyola University College of Law ethics professor Dane S. Ciolino, who tells the newspaper that Lemelle's order violates not only the public's right of access to court records but also legal - ethics rules that say a client is entitled to know how his lawyer shares fees with other lawyers.

Google will lead you to the website of the court jurisdiction in question; there will be different methods of access to the court records systems.

Not exact matches

A hacker who once advertised having access to user account information for websites like Facebook and Twitter has been linked through a Russian email address to the theft of a record 1.2 billion Internet credentials, the FBI said in court documents.

But that kind of targeted tracking would not require broad access to records of people unconnected to terror suspects and their known associates, which is hinted at by both Sen. Udall's remarks and the high rate of modifications imposed on Section 215 orders by the FISA court.

In September 2009, in the course of seeking access to gold records from the Federal Reserve and then suing the Fed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, GATA obtained a sensational written admission from the Fed, signed by Fed Board of Governors member Kevin M. Warsh, a former member of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets — the so - called «Plunge Protection Team.»

Dasuki told the court the need for him to be allowed to access his records and make necessary clarifications and consultations in order to be in good position to give cogent and verifiable evidence in the transaction that led to the filing of criminal charges against Metuh.

The plan will also update the bail system, improve a defendant's access to a speedy trial and competent court - appointed defense attorneys, require that all police interrogations be recorded and raise the age of criminal responsibility to 18.

The «second tier» mandates the award of attorney fees when a party denied access to records «has substantially prevailed» and the court finds that «the agency had no reasonable basis for denying access.»

Courts could also lose access to the European criminal records information system, which allows courts to request information on previous convictions of EU natiCourts could also lose access to the European criminal records information system, which allows courts to request information on previous convictions of EU naticourts to request information on previous convictions of EU nationals.

Judge Alan D. Scheinkman, Administrative Judge for the New York State Supreme Court in White Plains, NY has yet to respond to a August 25th, 2014 request for Talk of the Sound to cover the case and be granted access to the records in this case.

But he and members of other good government groups are putting a priority on strengthening FOIL in other ways, including passing a law that would mandate the payment of attorneys» fees to a plaintiff when a court finds that an agency had no «reasonable basis» to deny access to a public record.

The grieving parents finally got a court order to access these online records, arguing that just as their son's death gave them ownership of his tangible assets, so it also gave them rights to his digital contributions.

He used library accounts to obtain and then make available millions of court records from the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system, which charges for access to documcourt records from the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system, which charges for access to docrecords from the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system, which charges for access to docuAccess to Court Electronic Records system, which charges for access to documCourt Electronic Records system, which charges for access to docRecords system, which charges for access to docuaccess to documents.

L.A. County Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant ruled that the public interest in access to the ratings outweighed any teacher expectations of privacy under the California Public Records Act.

The analysis followed by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner is largely based on the «Model Policy for Access to Court Records in Canada» (the «Model Policy») prepared by the Judges» Technology Advisory Committee of the Canadian Judicial Council (the «CJC») in 2005.

I clicked on the «Settled Principles» tab to find 30 well - settled principles for public records, such as this statement from a California appellate decision, «[I] t is well established that the media has no greater right of access to public records than the general public,» and this from a Florida court, «It is well - settled that public records and reports or business records are admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule provided they are authenticated by a custodian.»

The Judiciary / Media Committee of the Supreme Judicial Court is considering revisions to the Guidelines on the Public's Right of Access to Judicial Proceedings and Records.

Earlier this week, the Supreme Court of Canada published its revised Policy for Access to Supreme Court of Canada Court Records.

Noting that the document was the result of a public consultation concerning electronic access to court records and its impacts on the open court principle, individual privacy and security rights, the Findings cite the Model Policy's guiding principles:

In other words, judges would presumably be more inclined to use their discretion to protect litigants» (and other participants») privacy if doing so would not be regarded as sacrificing openness or transparency but rather as a facilitator of access and enabler of court control over its records.

Is there anyone else out there who is tearing their hair out over Ontario's antediluvian system of providing access to court records?

If you regularly need to access court records, client files, or forms during client meetings, use an iPad or Android tablet instead of a laptop.

[16] Thus, the issue is framed — can a defendant or third party who has not obtained a doctor's report by compulsion of a court order, and prior to disclosure of any medical - legal reports by the plaintiff or in the absence of any reports, obtain access to the non-treating doctor's notes and clinical findings, or are said notes and clinical records privileged as forming part of the brief of the plaintiff's solicitor until the time when the plaintiff chooses to rely on the non-treating doctor as a witness at trial and the doctor's notes must be disclosed...

We have a proven track record in regulatory appeals in the Magistrates» Courts, before the Secretary of State and in the specialist tribunals, including appeals against abatement notices, enforcement notices, permitting decisions and access to environmental information.

Our attorneys are experienced in all aspects of Pennsylvania's Right - to Know Law, frequently representing requesters, public agencies and interested third parties in litigation before the Office of Open Records and Pennsylvania's appellate courts concerning requests for, and access to, government rRecords and Pennsylvania's appellate courts concerning requests for, and access to, government recordsrecords.

Notwithstanding the custody arrangement and in addition to all rights and duties given to parents pursuant to Section 63-5-30, each parent has equal access and the same right to obtain all educational records and medical records of his or her minor children and the right to participate in the children's school activities and extracurricular activities that are held in public locations unless prohibited by an order of the court or State law.

This project will allow Utah Legal Services (ULS) to implement the technology necessary to allow advocates serving clients remotely to securely access all of a client's internal case management information, pleadings and other documents as well as external court records and files.

Even with access to the entire court record of cases and to all the content in a firm's KM system, the volume of available legal data makes it likely that there's going to be a lot of generalization if you use AI to build a general purpose robot researcher.

If anyone from the Ministry of the Attorney General is reading this, and would care to explain why we are still stuck with 19th century access to public court records, I'm all ears.

The lawsuit, filed by the Alliance for Justice, the National Veterans Legal Services Program and the National Consumer Law Center, claims that the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts is violating the E-Government Act of 2002, which mandates that the fees to access court records online can not exceed the amount needed to maintain the system itself.

The acronym stands for Public Access to Court Electronic Records, but that public access comes with a catch — a registration requirement and a user fee of 8 cents perAccess to Court Electronic Records, but that public access comes with a catch — a registration requirement and a user fee of 8 cents peraccess comes with a catch — a registration requirement and a user fee of 8 cents per page.

This is often described as a «Big Data» function, but I think we tend to overlook the fact that data we've long had access to, such as court records and court opinions, are forms of Big Data that can be mined to extract information we haven't had access to before.

I am involved right now in a case to which the respondent Law Society of BC was easily able to secure a court order sealing the record and denying the public access to any hearings, though it is not clear to us on what basis that order is supposedly justified.

PACER means «Public Access to Court Electronic Records», giving access to over 500 million U.S. federal court documents, including a listing of parties involved in the litigation,... Access to Court Electronic Records», giving access to over 500 million U.S. federal court documents, including a listing of parties involved in the litigation,... [Court Electronic Records», giving access to over 500 million U.S. federal court documents, including a listing of parties involved in the litigation,... access to over 500 million U.S. federal court documents, including a listing of parties involved in the litigation,... [court documents, including a listing of parties involved in the litigation,... [more]

In an Aug. 27 decision written by Judge Mary A. McLaughlin, the court rejected the ACLU's request, finding that the First Amendment provides no public right of access to the court's records and that the statute provides private parties no right to participate in the proceedings.

The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed in Hopkins v. Kay, 2015 ONCA 112, that patients were not precluded by Ontario's privacy legislation from bringing a class action (based on the tort of intrusion upon seclusion) relating to improperly - accessed patient records.

The issue of balancing the right of the public to open courts with the right of an individual to privacy was tackled in 2003 in a discussion paper by the Canadian Judicial Council Judges Technology Advisory Committee (JTAC) titled «Open Courts, Electronic Access to Court Records, and Privacy&rcourts with the right of an individual to privacy was tackled in 2003 in a discussion paper by the Canadian Judicial Council Judges Technology Advisory Committee (JTAC) titled «Open Courts, Electronic Access to Court Records, and Privacy&rCourts, Electronic Access to Court Records, and Privacy».

The Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to providing free, public access to primary legal materials, has announced plans to download all of the free opinions and order available on PACER, the federal courts» system for electronic access to court records.

PACER — Public Access to Court Electronic Records — is the system operated by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to provide online access to case and docket information from the federal appellate, district and bankruptcy cAccess to Court Electronic Records — is the system operated by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to provide online access to case and docket information from the federal appellate, district and bankruptcy cCourts to provide online access to case and docket information from the federal appellate, district and bankruptcy caccess to case and docket information from the federal appellate, district and bankruptcy courtscourts.

The PACER service from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts provides on - line access to U.S. Appellate, District, and Bankruptcy court records and documents.

A judge of the Divisional Court, who was reviewing a decision of the Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner, granted the requester's counsel access to records notwithstanding a claim of solicitor ‑ client privilege by the Ministry of Correctional Services.

The Supreme Court gave us a test for this kind of question in Press - Enterprise II, which held that the First Amendment gives us a qualified right to access court proceedings and recCourt gave us a test for this kind of question in Press - Enterprise II, which held that the First Amendment gives us a qualified right to access court proceedings and reccourt proceedings and records.

Of interest to law folk will be the fact that back in 2008 Swartz, then a research fellow at Harvard University's Safra Center for Ethics, used a program of his to download 20 % of the documents made available by PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records)-- «more than eighteen million pages with an approximate value of $ 1.5 million,» according to FBI documents — and released them to the public en massOf interest to law folk will be the fact that back in 2008 Swartz, then a research fellow at Harvard University's Safra Center for Ethics, used a program of his to download 20 % of the documents made available by PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records)-- «more than eighteen million pages with an approximate value of $ 1.5 million,» according to FBI documents — and released them to the public en massof his to download 20 % of the documents made available by PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records)-- «more than eighteen million pages with an approximate value of $ 1.5 million,» according to FBI documents — and released them to the public en massof the documents made available by PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records)-- «more than eighteen million pages with an approximate value of $ 1.5 million,» according to FBI documents — and released them to the public en massof $ 1.5 million,» according to FBI documents — and released them to the public en masse.

When law enforcement agencies and courts have copies of the same record, you're almost always going to have better luck getting access from the courts, which are set to open by default.

In his decision, Perell acknowledged that «a judge, managing a class action is not a judge of the Youth Justice Court» and that he doesn't have jurisdiction to make an order under the Youth Criminal Justice Act to grant access to records.

As reported in the New Jersey Law Journal, the Appellate Division has confirmed a ruling made by a Superior Court Judge that orders the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office to pay two news outlets more than $ 100,000 in counsel fees after they successfully sued the office for access to 911 call recordings involving the fatal shooting of an individual.

Until her mother died, the plaintiff was unable to access her medical records in spite of the court's order compelling the defendant to release them.

Pursuant to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, access to all electronic and other court records shall be governed by the Standards for Access to Electronic Court Records and Access Security Maccess to all electronic and other court records shall be governed by the Standards for Access to Electronic Court Records and Access Security Macourt records shall be governed by the Standards for Access to Electronic Court Records and Access Security records shall be governed by the Standards for Access to Electronic Court Records and Access Security MAccess to Electronic Court Records and Access Security MaCourt Records and Access Security Records and Access Security MAccess Security Matrix.

I thought it might be helpful to add some broader analysis of when it's proper for a judge to gag people or to restrict access to court records.

Via CALL - L, there is a new policy at the Supreme Court of Canada, effective today for access to court recCourt of Canada, effective today for access to court reccourt records.