First, the statistic that «only 20 %
of active mutual funds beat their index» is entirely misleading.
Not exact matches
Active trading is hard, even the
mutual fund portfolio managers can not
beat the market net
of fees, and you should not trade if you do not know what you are doing.
Jason Zweig
of The Wall Street Journal recently cited an S&P study which found three quarters
of active mutual funds fail to
beat their benchmark over the long haul.
And some
mutual funds, especially those that are truly
active funds instead
of closet index
funds, actually have a chance
of beating the index and can do so over extended periods
of time.
It begins with my best attempt at laying out the case for passive investing: I explain the problems with
mutual funds and
active stock - picking strategies designed to
beat the market, and I encourage investors to focus on the things they can control rather than basing their financial lives around the pursuit
of an unlikely goal.
A word
of caution: if you go the
active management route, all you can do is put the odds in your favour; there is no guarantee that a
mutual fund will
beat the benchmark.
The SPIVA data shows that the longer
active funds try
beating the passive S&P 500 index the more dismal the record
of actively managed S&P 500
mutual funds becomes.
Let's not forget, passive can
beat active can
beat truly
active for long periods (hence the more recent performance
of ETFs vs.
mutual funds vs. hedge
funds)... as frustrating as it can be, it's important to remember there's little correlation between the work you put into your portfolio & your actual short - term returns.
The S&P Indices versus
Active Fund Scorecard (SPIVA) record shows how flimsy the claim is: the percentage
of mutual funds beating the TSX Composite index over a 5 - year period was 42 % in 2004, 31 % in 2005, 11 % in 2006 and 8.5 % in 2007.
I'm surprised they didn't talk about fees and the fact that the index
funds still
beat 60 %
of active mutual fund managers.
Most equity
active mutual funds do not
beat the index so I am a fan
of ETF's or index
mutual funds.
Active mutual fund managers can't even
beat passive
funds, yet Bennett espouses individual market timing
of stocks for the average Joe, and says the mind can not conceive otherwise?