Over the last ten years, one - fourth of human - emissions of carbon dioxide as well as 90 percent
of additional warming due to the greenhouse effect have been absorbed by the oceans.
Not exact matches
According to researchers,
additional future
warming of tropical Pacific waters —
due in part to human activity — should continue the long - term storminess trend.
Schlesinger and Ramankutty reach broadly similar conclusions, but they also point out that even though greenhouse gases now dominate global
warming, if part
of the
warming during this century is indeed
due to solar changes, the
additional greenhouse effect may be weaker than was previously thought (Nature, vol 360, p 330).
Studies such as Otto et al. (2012) display how the numerical scale
of the simulation numbers allows for clear separation between a climate with lower level
of heat - trapping gases (1960s) and the recent period (2000s), such that the 2010 heat wave in western Russia was more likely to occur with the
additional warming due to climate change (Figure 3).
Additional ridges or «tooth marks» on the sides
of the swollen tongue are evidence
of excess cold in the digestive system, which is often
due to a lack
of warming foods in the diet.
However, the Management and Guest Contributors at WUWT accept the basic truth that CO2, water vapor, and other «greenhouse gases» are responsible for an ~ 33ºC boost in mean Earth temperature, that CO2 levels are rising, partly
due to our use
of fossil fuels, that land use has changed Earth's albedo, and that this human actvity has caused
additional warming.
A very rough back
of the envelope calculation suggest that energy required to melt that ice is equivalent to 1 - 2 %
of the
additional energy
due to greenhouse
warming over the same period.
With even further
warming more hydrates are released,
additional global soil feedback (extreme soil respiration rates, compost bomb instability) and weathering becomes a driver, now Ocean very stratified, maybe things like permanent El Nino, weather systems probably move very slow — everything gets stuck
due to lack
of perturbed ocean, no or very little frozen water at the poles.
It is also very crucial to include the most definitive estimates
of additional carbon cycle feedbacks that have already been locked in
due to current (and future)
warming.
Do you agree that when the heating effect
of extra CO2 is
due almost exclusively to what it itself absorbs from outside, but the cooling effect entails an ability to dissipate heat from the
additional source, cooling can now outweigh
warming?
Given that this 2.0 C goal calculation apparently excludes the ~ doubling
of warming due to the predictable loss
of the «sulphate parasol», and excludes all carbon feedback outputs, it is hard to see how an
additional forcing from feedback permafrost methane «comparable to what CO2 can do» can be viewed as anything but calamitous.
Here we would like to try to distinguish between
warming in the nocturnal boundary layer
due to a redistribution
of heat and
warming due to the accumulation
of heat... It is likely that the observed
warming in minimum temperature, whether caused by
additional greenhouse forcing or land use changes or other land surface dynamics, is reflecting a redistribution
of heat by turbulence - not an accumulation
of heat.
The supposedly dangerous
warming is
due to the
additional assumption
of constant relative humidity, which is put into GCMs.
We know that the
warming effect
of atmospheric carbon dioxide is logarithmic (meaning each
additional unit has less effect than the one preceding) and estimates
of warming due to increased carbon dioxide since the Industrial Revolution are really quite small.
The fact that there has on any basis been little further
warming over the course
of the last 10 to 15 years over and above that which had already occured by the mid / late 19902 suggests that recent extreme weather events are not the consequence
of additional warming (there having been all but none these past 15 years) and therefore must be
due to natural variability
of weather events in an ever changing and chaotic world in which we live.
Studies such as Otto et al. (2012) display how the numerical scale
of the simulation numbers allows for clear separation between a climate with lower level
of heat - trapping gases (1960s) and the recent period (2000s), such that the 2010 heat wave in western Russia was more likely to occur with the
additional warming due to climate change (Figure 3).
«Arctic Ice in «Death Spiral» with
additional heating
due to global
warming, the extent
of sea ice cover has gotten smaller and smaller over the summers since the 1980s.
Climate change has been steadily raising the earth's average temperature in recent decades, but climatologists expected
additional warming this year and next
due to the influence
of El Niño.
The social cost
of carbon is the discounted monetary value
of future climate change damages
due to
additional CO2 emissions (for example, the costs
of adverse agricultural effects, protecting against rising sea levels, health impacts, species loss, risks
of extreme
warming scenarios, and so on).
Due to the amount
of forcing that has been added to the system, the negative feedbacks are not expected to outweigh the positive feedbacks, therefore
additional warming is expected.
The divergence observed during the last decades is likely
due to (1) an
additional anthropogenic
warming component, which was quite significant during the last decades, and (2) to the necessity
of using a more advanced model to obtain the temperature signature
of the solar variability.
The worlds oceans have
warmed only 0.09 C over the past 55 years [Levitus et al 2012], which could only
warm the atmosphere by a maximum
of an
additional 0.09 C
due to both the 1st and 2nd laws
of thermodynamics.
So there could be some
additional future
warming due to sequestration
of heat in the deep ocean.
Like I said, «The worlds oceans have
warmed only 0.09 C over the past 55 years [Levitus et al 2012], which could only
warm the atmosphere by a maximum
of an
additional 0.09 C
due to both the 1st and 2nd laws
of thermodynamics.»
Criteria Description Fish Toxicity Measure
of the acute toxicity to fish (both saltwater and freshwater) Daphnia Toxicity Measure
of the acute toxicity to Daphnia (invertebrate aquatic organisms) Algae Toxicity Measure
of the acute toxicity to aquatic plants Persistence / Biodegradation Rate
of degradation for a substance in the environment (air, soil, or water) Bioaccumulation Potential for a substance to accumulate in fatty tissue and magnify up the food chain Climatic relevance Measure
of the impact a substance has on the climate (e.g., ozone depletion, global
warming, etc.) Other Any
additional characteristic (e.g., soil organism toxicity, WGK water classification, etc.) relevant to the overall evaluation but not included in the previous criteria 1.3.3 Material Class Criteria The following material classes are flagged
due to the concern that at some point in their life cycle they may have negative impacts on human and environmental health.
What matters is that it is self - evident that the
warming that has already occurred
due to the current anthropogenic excess
of CO2 is already having destructive, costly, and worsening impacts, and there is certain to be
additional warming from that level
of CO2, and adding more CO2 year is only going to make things much, much worse.
These effects combined with an estimated decrease in electricity demand by 2 %
due to
warmer temperatures, could provide an
additional 11 TWh
of annual energy.
I have absolutely no doubt that
additional CO2 in the atmosphere will cause
warming (in must), and I agree that at least some
of the
warming measured over the past 60 + years is most likely
due to GHG forcing.
A very
warm desk has become available at Randstad Business Support here in the very heart
of Swansea
due to the fact we are growing our service offering within the Swansea market and are keen to bring an
additional recruitment consultant to our growing team.