Sentences with phrase «of alarmist stories»

And there's the type that is to be disregarded for the sake of alarmist stories about single, aberrant weather events.

Will the Secretary of State say a little more about why he thinks that the regulatory environment here will be superior to that of the United States, thereby disproving many of the alarmist stories that are circulating?»

(Or «Global Production of Alarmist Story - Lines Past Peak» or «Gloom - Mine Reserves Increasing According to Demand» or «New Scientist in Search of Renewable Sources Of Gloomy Stories» or [INSERT OWN HEADLINE HERE]-RRB-

Not exact matches

At times, this «alarming» story morphs into the more «alarmist» language of catastrophe, calamity or doom.

But if environmentalists and environment reporters can run around shrieking about the man - made destruction of the natural order every time a robin shows up on Georgian Bay two weeks early, then it is at least fair game to use this winter's weather stories to wonder whether the alarmist are being a tad premature.

Only two journalists actually wrote alarmist articles, and one of these (at least) had a long conversation with Sylvia Knight in which Sylvia told her (the Metro journo) exactly what was wrong with the story.

Mann and Gore with the hockey - stick fraud is one of hundreds of such sick alarmist tricks to build a fake story on man made climate fiction.

There is conflict in all the organizations mentioned and the ability to coordinate the alarmist and eco-agenda messages on many fronts has been part of the story.

The post was moved by comments around this particularly alarmist headline, which epitomised the Independent's coverage of the climate story.

Likely those who have posted comments to this story have not been aware that it has produced some new data for me on the tactics of the alarmist.

No matter how many stories seek to distract you with the shiny objects of prurient dialogue between sniveling, petulant and nasty global warming alarmists, that isn't the story.

My great surprise is even greater because these outlets have demonstrated a pattern of only giving ink to embarrassing controversies after a week or so, once it appears that damage control is needed and the alarmists have gotten their story straight.

Deniers would love us to spell out which effect is «worse» and then label us the exaggerating «extremists and alarmists» or accuse us of «conflicting story».

If ocean oscillations are as powerful a climate driver as the anti-CO2 alarmists claim then this graph suggests a simple story: that cold Pacific surface waters swallowed up a big gulp of warmth from 1940 - 1970, which the PDO then belched back up during its warm - phase in the 80s and 90s.

«After 30 years of these «Chicken Little» alarmist scare stories independent scientists, specialists in a myriad of related disciplines, are speaking out about what they see is junk science.

As we've seen over the last couple of years, many of the more outlandish and alarmist claims in the IPCC reports have been based not on peer - reviewed science, but on «grey literature» — the propaganda sheets and press releases distributed by fanatical green NGOs (many of which are part - funded by the European Commission — but that's another story).

Don't get me wrong, I don't buy into the AGW alarmist story that we are anywhere near a tipping point or even that human CO2 and land use activities are responsible for most of the warming we have experienced in the past 150 years.

We might add on to that another 0.1 degrees of possible cooling, giving us -0.2 degrees, yet leaving the alarmist story intact.

Alarmists, embarrassed by the earth's refusal to warm as their models predict, have concocted all sorts of scary stories about «warming in the pipeline,» etc..

Compiled by many of the IPCC's veteran alarmists, in yet another bid to get that «global climate treaty» that isn't going to happen in Paris next year, it wheels on all the familiar scare stories.

How is it that you alarmists never seem to read stories of Big Corporate Climate Science fudging data in order to keep those Big Corporate Government «grants» rolling in?

The flaws in the alarmist position Lindzen exposed in 1992 remain the same today: the global warming scare story depends on hopelessly inadequate computer models which place too much emphasis on man - made CO2 and which therefore produce a «disturbingly arbitrary» picture of the state of climate.

James Delingpole of Breitbart News Network filed a story, «Climate Alarmist Caught in «Largest Science Scandal in U.S. History»» on October 2, 2015:

The alarmist story is allowed to proceed in spite of facts, and without scrutiny or criticism.

The story was revived as environmentalists and alarmists exploited the «world - will - end» potential of the BP oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico.

Levi, who is the CFR's top guru on climate change, is surely aware by now of the overwhelming evidence, including admissions by some of the top alarmists, that there has been no measurable global warming for the past 16 years, all of the media horror stories and Al Gore pronouncements about impending Climate Armageddon notwithstanding.

Not long ago a University of Graz Professor called for the death penalty for scientists who did not agree with the visions of alarmist climate scientists, who have dominated the media and public scene with scare stories of super-storms and Biblical sea level rise for 15 years.

The really big story, and it is a big story, is how climate alarmists have seized control of the institutions of science, the AAAS, the NRC, etc that the uninformed public relies on as purveyors of the best truth.

So far, environmental alarmists have been able to avoid reaching the peak because they have been able to locate new trends, and invent new ways of telling stories about the progress of little blue lines which, for that season, appear to make sense.

Is there anything left in the climate alarmist armoury of scary stories / pseudo-science that has not now been totally debunked?

Curiously, while alarmists warn about the horrors of returning to the climate of millions of years ago, paleoclimatologists tell a different story.

With print media going through their own nightmare, maybe they realize now that focusing on real stories (instead of senselessly parroting what comes out of alarmist institutions like the IPCC) will retain existing and attract new readers.

My recent comments on Advocate Daily about this [see the whole story here: Police concerns unfounded, alarmist] seem more timely now that Canadian police chiefs say that the federal Department of Justice is weighing how to get around the Supreme Court's ruling that police need a warrant to obtain subscriber data linked to online activities [See the Star report here]