Not unlike HB5227, HB2825, which passed the House and is currently in the Senate's Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, calls for «a threat assessment regarding the actual and potential threat posed by individuals using virtual currency to carry out activities in
furtherance of an act of terrorism.»
The court ruled authorities could not inspect or distribute the data to a foreign government unless it was to protect national security or because Miranda was involved in the commission, instigation or
preparation of an act of terrorism.
Using a biased regulatory analysis, the agency excluded the
possibility of an act of terrorism as well as the potential for damage from a fire beyond 50 miles of a plant.
Kruger, who runs the gamut of emotions as the grieving, angry
survivor of an act of terrorism, acknowledged the victims of such acts, saying, «Please know that you are not forgotten.»
The ideological line is drawn, but the split between the Avengers only grows when Captain America's childhood friend turned Soviet assassin, the Winter Soldier (Sebastian Stan), shows up and is
suspected of an act of terrorism.
Brett Tollman, President and CEO of The Travel Corporation, discusses how unlikely it is to be the
victim of an act of terrorism and why traveling right after a terrorist attack might actually be the best time.
If those numbers don't put you at ease, or you're simply stressed at the
potential of acts of terrorism playing havoc with your travel logistics, one good way to keep your travel options open is to purchase travel insurance that includes terrorism as a coverable reason.
The section calls for the undersecretary of Homeland Security for Intelligence and Analysis, along with «appropriate Federal partners,» to «develop and disseminate a threat assessment regarding the actual and potential threat posed by individuals using virtual currency to carry out activities in
furtherance of an act of terrorism.»
A terrorist is defined by the legislation as someone who «is or has been concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation
of acts of terrorism».
In R v Zafar and others the appeal court cleared the men of possessing articles for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation
of an act of terrorism, contrary to s 57 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
The defendants were tried on an indictment alleging offences contrary to s 57 of TA 2000, namely of possessing articles for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation
of an act of terrorism.
No problem arose in respect of the phrase «possession for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation
of an act of terrorism» where the article possessed was an article such as was intended to be incorporated in a bomb, or used as an ingredient of explosives designed for an act of terrorism.
«(1) A person commits an offence if he possesses an article in circumstances which give rise to a reasonable suspicion that his possession is for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation
of an act of terrorism.
«A person commits an offence if he possesses an article in circumstances which give rise to a reasonable suspicion that he intends it to be used for the purpose of the commission, preparation or instigation
of an act of terrorism.»
(2) It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to prove that his possession of the article was not for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation
of an act of terrorism.»
Specifically, the bill called on the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis to examine «the threat posed by individuals using virtual currency to carry out activities in furtherance
of an act of terrorism, including the provision of material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization.»