Sentences with phrase «of animal nature»

It's more of an interesting reminder of our animal nature than anything else.

But we can not ignore the obvious truth of our animal nature.

Not exact matches

Yalong Bay Tropical Paradise Forest is a rainforest park that contains over 1,500 varieties of tropical plants and over 190 kinds of wild animals, and it's the perfect way to experience Hainan's unique nature and ecology.

A recent study published in Nature looked at thousands of different mammal species and worked out the percentage of cases in which animal fatalities were caused by their own kind.

Sales of the startup's eggless mayo boomed during 2015's avian bird flu epidemic — an incident that revealed much about the fragile nature of Earth's reliance on animals for food.

These measures also suggest Americans are more likely to die from gun violence than the combined risks of drowning, fire and smoke, stabbing, choking on food, airplane crashes, animal attacks, and forces of nature.

«Pandora — The World of Avatar» is an expansion of Disney's Animal Kingdom that urges attendees to «discover an all - new land that celebrates the magic of nature,» according Disney World's website.

This one is «the capacity to make important, relevant discriminations in the world of nature between one plant and another, between one animal and another.

«We have a deep - seated psychological need to connect with nature,» Freeman says of our animal instincts and co-evolution with nature.

Given the speculative nature of GFI's impact on farmed animals, we currently have not completed a cost - effectiveness estimate for donations to GFI.

Indeed in nature today we see many many examples of animals that are partially adapted to flight (frogs, flying squirrels, etc.).

All of nature, his entire creation, vegetable, animal, and human will be made whole in heaven.

It is part of our nature to want answers to want answers; to know how things work, what causes things to happen, to understand why people, animals, even bugs do what they do.

«Nature» in the sense of what animals do, will never resolve this argument.

The pamphlet «What makes Man Unique» comments that nature, from its own internal laws, should not produce an animal which is beyond environmental control, as it in fact does in the case of man.

Due to the limited statistical and methodological certainty allowed by biological science, the occurrence of technical errors in biological experiments, the differences between human and animal embryo development, the rapidity by which the cloning procedure produces a totipotent zygote, and the philosophical and theological nature of the question, there is no biological experiment that will prove with moral certainty that a human zygote never exists during the OAR procedure.

While exhorting us to contemplate nature, the Qur» an says, «In the creation of skies and the earth, the difference between night and day, the ships which run at sea carrying that which is useful for mankind, the rain water which Allah sends down from the sky to revive the earth after its death, and to spread animals on it, and the arrangement of winds and clouds between sky and earth, in all those things there are evidences (for the existence of God) for those who make use of their brains» (Surah II, 164).

When we see the consumptive, destructive ways of nature and realize our own inevitable participation in the carnage, it's easiest to say, «They're just animals,» or «That's just the way it is.»

The code of laws provides the regulations which create the proper relations between man and God, such as saying prayers, fasting, and other religious duties; they guide man in his relations with his brother in Islam or the non-Muslim community, in organizing the structure of the family and encouraging reciprocal affection; they lead man to an understanding of his place in the universe, encouraging research into the nature of man and animals and guiding man in the use of the benefits of the natural world.

And I have heard British Catholic bishops affirming the purely mechanical nature of animal life.

I'm curious to know why you have ruled out the possibility that Nature might select for optimum forms of eyesight in completely different animals.

Humans are animals... we are as much a part of nature as any other earth bound life form.

In To Gaurus, Porphyry's main concern is to establish the plant - like nature of the embryo over and above its animal - like qualities.

Nor were animals and the forces of nature to be bowed down to by man as in pagan religion; rather man, as a rational being made in the image of God, was to exercise dominion over them.

You, and most so called followers of Jesus» teachings, continue to act impulsively with your primitive animal nature.

It is, to repeat, because current formulations of Christian theology in general do not picture our relations to animals in any such way that we need the corrective of a theology of nature.

Although there is much cruelty in the treatment of animals in the Indian subcontinent, as elsewhere in the world, all the Indian religions teach a sense of oneness with nature and a reverence for life.

But for Darwin, we don't just share some aspects of our nature with animals.

The woman was going on about how she loves the animal and did nt want to harm it but she forgot the nature of what she was dealing with.

You said — «God accepts human nature is because we are the only species that can give him what he wants — which, in the view of Genesis, is bloody, burned animal sacrifices.»

With this in mind Christians rightly turn to biblical authors who go beyond stewardship to stress a just treatment of animals; to Orthodox traditions with their emphases on a sacramental understanding of nature; and to classical, Western writers such as Irenacus, the later Augustine, Francis of Assisi, and the Rhineland mystics who stress the value of creation as a whole.

The point of all this is that dominance is the one animal instinct the human race either inherited from its primate forebears and retained after losing all the other instincts, or acquired by imitating this animal behavior when the human race fell from a higher nature.

In fact, according to the Bible, the reason that God accepts human nature is because we are the only species that can give him what he wants — which, in the view of Genesis, is bloody, burned animal sacrifices.

Study of Scripture through the filter of man's biases results in the type of man - centered ideas proferred by Baden, like «God learns to accept their inherently evil nature», and humans «are the only species that can give him what he wants — which, in the view of Genesis, is bloody, burned animal sacrifices», and «it is, rather, our job to make ourselves uncomfortable that he might be appeased.»

Love, submission to hindu monkey ism, ignorant secular ism, is not way of human, but of hindu animals, stupid atheist by nature.

These are some of many subjects that competent and well respected scholars continue to debate and vigourously disagree on.That is the nature of the animal we call theology... if everything we come to believe about the Christian faith is a product of infallible indisputable revelation, then the case is closed.

What would a day be in the Divine circadian cycle of an omnimodal, omnipotent being, 24 hours, 24 billion years, 24 milliseconds??? Nowhere in the Bible coes it say that evolution does not exist within the living realm, but Simon Peter does say that to the I Am»... one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years is as one day...» (the Bible DOES recognize the effects of animal husbandry, which is a form of artificially - induced evolution on livestock species, and narrates accounts of Divine intervention to influence it, so you can not factually say that it is outside the realm of Divine probability by biblical accounts, as Divine probability contains, by textbook definition, the sum of the laws of nature.

At the end of history, we can return to nature or eternity as either soulless animals or contemplative thinkers.

I am proud to be a member of the animal kingdom and nature.

It's not just life / human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect&rnature / NATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect&rNATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect»?

Machines have radically altered the nature of work, largely by eliminating man as a source of animal power and by reducing to a minimum the routine and repetitive types of work that men must perform.

This failure to grasp the universal nature of ideality also results in animals, however virtuous, not qualifying as full - fledged moral agents (AAMB 52) 4

Unfortunately, as a former Christian, well acquainted with sin and confession and the whole bloody business of sacrifice to appease Someone who thinks that shows «love,» I question the whole ancient story, all the animals killed, all the trees cut down (for temples and churches and crosses and «holy books») and all the human beings left to feel separated again and again from the universe, Nature, each other and their «gods.»

Hence the failure of animal consciousness to grasp the universal nature of ideality or symbol, as in number, structure, goodness, or other abstract concepts such as beauty and God.

His good creation was not intended to function this way, but since He gave humans, angels, and even animals (to a degree) the freedom to make genuine choices, we sometimes use this freedom in ways that are contrary to the will and desire of God, and when we do this, the forces of nature suffer the consequences, and chaos rages over the face of earth, wreaking havoc, destroying lives, and bringing destruction in its wake.

Shouldn't we now embrace our animal side, now tune ourselves to all of nature's call?

Oh, and yes, of course I mean that individual animals — as beings with distinct personal natures — belong to that restored cosmos, no less than individual humans.

The ancient claim that man is by nature a political animal and must in and through the exercise and practice of virtue learned in communities achieve a form of local and communal self - limitation — a condition properly understood as liberty — can not be denied forever without cost.

Not being particularly Aristotelian in my understanding of the soul, I feel no great need (or desire) to guard the metaphysical and moral partition between sensitive and rational natures, or between animal and spiritual souls.

everything is wrong... thats the nature of human beings... WE ARE ANIMALS....