It's provides flexible protection when there are new situations
of animal suffering not covered by existing welfare laws.
Not exact matches
A paraphilia is a disorder that is characterized by recurrent intense sexual urges and sexually arousing fantasies generally involving: nonhuman objects; the
suffering or humiliation
of oneself or one's partner (
not merely simulated); or
animals, children, or other nonconsenting persons.
Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow
of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you
not but squeeze money out
of you with tales and stories... There is another type
of possessions and that is
not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment
of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents
of public toilets and market places... Some
of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an
animal at night which could have been one
of them or possessed by one
of them... So this is true thing happening to many who
suffer unexplainable illnesses or
sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
I'm
not saying the unnecessary
suffering of animals is good, or moral, but rather pointing out that your perspective on the subject is no more rational, no more based on fact, than that
of the people you are arguing against.
When eating meat
not only causes
suffering to
animals but also deprives the world's poor
of needed food, it will certainly
not be justified.
Because
animals can
suffer, we have ethical obligations
not to inflict upon them more pain, relative to their capacities for sentience, than we would inflict on creatures
of our own kind, relative to our capacities.
But in the present situation, where the meat that comes to our table usually represents extended
suffering on the part
of the
animal whose body we eat, we recognize that withdrawal
of support from the whole system through vegetarianism is a fully appropriate, if
not morally mandated, position.
His good creation was
not intended to function this way, but since He gave humans, angels, and even
animals (to a degree) the freedom to make genuine choices, we sometimes use this freedom in ways that are contrary to the will and desire
of God, and when we do this, the forces
of nature
suffer the consequences, and chaos rages over the face
of earth, wreaking havoc, destroying lives, and bringing destruction in its wake.
The qualitative distinction between physical
suffering (
of animals) and spiritual
suffering (
of humans) is
not drawn out.
In the third place, there is, as I have already said, no intentional inflicting
of evil in most if
not all
suffering in the
animal world.
Again, when he observes the pitiful cries and frightened appearance
of birds and
animals about to be slaughtered, he can
not help feeling an «inability to bear» their
sufferings.
I bring the conversation up because it came to mind last week when I was reading about a Christian ethicist so passionately committed to defending the (unmistakably) exceptional nature
of human beings that he thinks it necessary to forbid his children any sentimental solicitude for the
suffering of beasts, and to disabuse them
of the least trace
of the dangerous fantasy or pathetic fallacy that
animals experience anything analogous to human emotions, motives, or needs; they can
not really, he insists, know anxiety, grief, regret, or disappointment, and so we should never allow them to divert our sympathies or ethical longings from their proper object.
[53] This radical understanding
of suffering caused one fur - trapper to remark that
animal protectionists would
not be happy even if we trapped and killed the
animals with «sweet dreams and tender kisses.»
Even if
animals in factory - farms were anesthetized, and thus could
not suffer, there would still be reason to protest at depriving them
of their natural fulfillments.
[33] Finally, if killing or harming
animals is wrong or
not God's perfect will, then Christ's perfection is in doubt (Heb 9:14) as he was directly and indirectly involved in the infliction
of death and
suffering upon
animals.
For example, most
animal protectionists will argue that the mere death
of the
animal (unless to end
suffering not induced by humans) is by definition cruel, as the
animal will have lost its expectation
of life.
Not our differences and distinctions, — we feel — no, but our common
animal essence
of patience under
suffering and enduring effort must be what redeems us in the Deity's sight.
Animal activists also fail to remind the public that the problems
of pain /
suffering and injuries to non-targets are
not exclusively the domain
of footholds.
Duranty's morals are neatly summed up in one
of his 1935 dispatches: «It may be objected that the vivisection
of living
animals is a sad and dreadful thing, and it is true that the lot
of [those] who have opposed the Soviet experiment is
not a happy one,» but «in both cases, the
suffering inflicted is done with a noble purpose.»
Chickens and geese and all wild
animals do the same thing... Only man, who after all is rational, does
not spring to the aid
of his
suffering neighbour in time
of need and has no pity on him.»
But if we decide that it is acceptable to treat humans worse than we treat
animals, it should
not surprise us if many people at the grassroots level decide that as along as they have to die like a dog, they would rather
not suffer the fate
of an abandoned stray.
The goal
of most vegans is to reduce
animal suffering and cooking your veggie burger on a different grill isn't going to do that.
When laws are failing, and caring eyes aren't watching,
animals are at greatest risk —
of abuse, neglect and extreme
suffering.
The graphic video also documents prolonged
suffering of pigs used for breeding who are confined in gestation crates, two - foot - wide metal cages so small the
animals can't even turn around, rendering them virtually immobilized for almost their entire lives.
The graphic videos document prolonged
suffering of pigs used for breeding who are confined in cages so small the
animals can't even turn around, rendering them virtually immobilized for their entire lives.
Was it because you wanted to reduce the amount
of animal suffering by
not giving money to those companies?
Much
of the cruelty witnessed over the years has been the result
of individuals buying
animals for private or backyard slaughter or fearful and un-trained workers
not having the training or the equipment to manage large, frightened
animals in a way that would at least reduce their
suffering.
Animals Australia's investigations have forced significant industry reform but even today, Australian government live export regulations do not require pre-slaughter stunning, so most exported animals suffer through the pain and distress of having their throats cut while fully con
Animals Australia's investigations have forced significant industry reform but even today, Australian government live export regulations do
not require pre-slaughter stunning, so most exported
animals suffer through the pain and distress of having their throats cut while fully con
animals suffer through the pain and distress
of having their throats cut while fully conscious.
Aramark's policy will ensure that millions
of animals won't ever know the
suffering that comes from a lifetime inside a cage.
It is highly effective in healing sore and cracked nipples but
suffer from few drawbacks like allergic reactions,
animal source and possibility
of pesticide (
not a concern in high grade lanolin creams)
Defence minister Philip Dunne stated: «As part
of the licensing process, the researchers have to convince the Home Office that the work is required, that the results can
not be obtained without the use
of animals and that every step has been taken to minimise pain and
suffering to the
animals involved.»
Under the
Animal Welfare Act 2006, people have a duty of care not only to ensure that an animal doesn't suffer unnecessarily, but also to take reasonable steps to ensure that the animal's welfare needs ar
Animal Welfare Act 2006, people have a duty
of care
not only to ensure that an
animal doesn't suffer unnecessarily, but also to take reasonable steps to ensure that the animal's welfare needs ar
animal doesn't
suffer unnecessarily, but also to take reasonable steps to ensure that the
animal's welfare needs ar
animal's welfare needs are met.
NAVS maintains that
not only is
animal testing
of any kind inhumane, but it's also more expensive and less reliable than other methods which do
not rely on inflicting pain and
suffering on rabbits and other furry friends.
And I've got to say, those rat data have me seriously considering a return to my old vegetarianism days —
not that I dine on rats,
of course, but laughing
animals do make the prospect
of animal suffering unusually salient and uncomfortable in my mind.
This is
not only because tests on laboratory
animals can cause much
suffering, but also because the relevance
of the data they provide for predicting effects in humans or other
animals is severely limited by differences among major species.
The same rule applies here... we are feeling
animals foods they were
not meant to eat, and their health
suffers because
of it.
I want to help people feel that kind
of relaxation and freedom now — I can't watch people or
animals suffer.
Of course, we should all work for the elimination of confinement animal facilities, which do cause a great deal of suffering in our animals, not to mention desecration of the environmen
Of course, we should all work for the elimination
of confinement animal facilities, which do cause a great deal of suffering in our animals, not to mention desecration of the environmen
of confinement
animal facilities, which do cause a great deal
of suffering in our animals, not to mention desecration of the environmen
of suffering in our
animals,
not to mention desecration
of the environmen
of the environment.
Don't get me wrong, medicine and other fields
of study have benefited from plastic, but the health
of humans,
animals (especially aquatic) and the planet are
suffering the consequences.
They just can't reconcile the
suffering with their love
of eating
animals, and psychology is powerful.
However, I don't want to indulge at the expense
of animal suffering.
While it is true that processed carbohydrates contribute to today's high incidence
of chronic diseases the consumption
of animal products and high fat foods are a much larger problem
not only in due to health issues with cholesterol and saturated fats but due to all the chemicals (e.g. dioxins, mercury, other persistent organic pollutants)
not to mention environmental degradation,
animal suffering and worker safety issues.
In Africa where intake
of animal protein is very low women do
not suffer from osteoporosis.
And I love knowing my food now comes from the earth and doesn't involve the
suffering or slaughter
of any
animals.
Consider eating a vegetarian diet because the flesh
of dead
animals is
not a trophy
of a well tamed and understood ego; it is anger, cruel and untimely death,
suffering and pain and as a person on the yogic path you wish to be none
of those things.
This doesn't have to come at the expense
of your health, or that
of the
animals that often
suffer to bring you the latest cosmetics.
This doesn't have to come at the expense
of the
animals that often
suffer to bring you the latest cosmetics.
I hate human and
animal and any kind
of suffering, think everything would be better off if it didn't exist......
When Elli Barber, a young American doctor, arrives in Khaufpur to open a free clinic for the still
suffering townsfolk — only to find herself struggling to convince them that she isn't there to do the dirty work
of the Kampani —
Animal gets caught up in a web
of intrigues, scams, and plots with the unabashed aim
of turning events to his own advantage.
For what I saw in her face was
not the ignorant
suffering of an
animal.