A gibbon - like size has a range of consequences for existing models
of ape evolution.
The fossil skull throws light on that period
of ape evolution.
Not exact matches
Science has a ton
of assumptions and we need to make sure we are also teaching our kids that aspect,
evolution (as it pertains to we came from
apes) has many flaws and unanswered questions and shouldn't be taught as scientific fact!
From Big Bang to Big Mystery: Human Origins in the Light
of Creation and
Evolution by Brendan Purcell New City Press, 370 pages, $ 34.95 Benjamin Disraeli famously asked whether man is «an
ape or an angel» and answered that he himself stood «on the side
of the angels.»
One thing that many Christians get hung up on is the idea
of evolution as a belief that we all developed from single celled organisms and that our genetic map split from
apes and etc..
It gets me that christians don't believe in
evolution and will ask if we evolved from
apes why there are still
apes but yet do not see the lunacy
of the Adam and Eve story, where in order to populate the earth incest would have been necessary.
and there has yet to be definitive proof
of ape evolving into human if you have it please by all means post it the world would like to see it, oh and you forgot to put in how
evolution has as many gaps as any religion like Genesis Park describes a number
of images drawn by Neanderthals and by humans in the Middle East which resemble dinosaurs.
There is plenty
of evidence for
evolution (althought we didn't come «from
apes,» but from a common ancestor with
apes) and literally no evidence that we were created as is by a deity.
so again lets see this proof
of evolution between
ape and man
The universe is 13.7 billion years old (cosmology: best estimate based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism The earth is 4.5 billion years old (cosmology: best estimate based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism Life emerged from non-life (Biogenesis theory... cause and process unknown)- nothing to do with Atheism Life spread and diversified through
evolution (best available explanation)- nothing to do with Atheism Man evolved from common
ape ancestor (
evolution science)- nothing to do with Atheism Consciousness is an emergent property
of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Emotions, memories and intelligence are functions
of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Morals are emergent qualities
of social animals (natural science)- nothing to do with Atheism
From the
evolution side
of things, do you really think that two people started the whole race
of mankind from the
apes???? Sounds crazy to me...
I guess its not their fault, perhaps atheists have a deeper understanding
of evolution since there ancestors are
apes and Christians well, are built in the image
of God.
Don't misunderstand me; some evolutionists (particularly some
of the neo-atheists like Richard Dawkins, who argues in his new book people who don't believe in
evolution are on the same level as Holocaust deniers) have gone
ape over their theory (forgive the pun) to the point that they seem to forget it is a theory, and refer to it as if it is an undeniable scientific fact.
Our
evolution from
apes means we aren't necessarily here for a specific purpose, but rather by luck
of the draw and good old fashioned survival instinct.
If there is indeed a soul or purpose for man that is greater than self (animal)
evolution would point towards something greater not something less than or limited to the purpose
of an
ape or a plant.
Much opposition to the concept
of evolution in the nineteenth century derived from a revulsion against the idea that humans were descended from
ape - like animals long ago.
And as for the origin
of species and
evolution in terms
of the scientific method, that scientific method has given us the ability to decode the DNA genome
of many animals, and to show where, back in time, the various relatives
of man and modern
apes, for example, branched off into separate species.
You are aware that the theory
of evolution in NO way suggests that human beings evolved «from»
apes or monkeys, right?
If
evolution is a law, as so many seems to accept, you would see
apes evolving into human beings since beginning
of human history and everyday
of our lives.
Finally, when it comes to the
evolution of human, I think that Mark Twain had it right when he said that
apes are descended from man.
You can't deny the scientific evidence that continuely points to the creation
of the universe millions and millions
of years ago and
evolution of humans from
apes unless your intention is for the U.S. to continue to fall behind the rest
of the world in math and science and become the villiage idiot.
My idea
of a higher intelligence in something that sparked the fuse
of evolution (yes we did evolve from pre-historic man and esstentially
apes get over yourselves creationists) and nothing more.
Meaning that Mankind was not a result
of evolution of Monkeys &
Apes... rather the other way round on reversed
evolution...!
The opponents
of evolution said that humans were not
apes, not even transformed
apes.
Much
of the opposition to the idea
of evolution in the nineteenth century derived from a revulsion against the idea that humans were descended from
ape - like creatures long ago.
From the highest
ape to MAN there is a huge leap in intellect, not explicable by material
evolution, a diference
of kind, not merely degree.
Critics
of evolution are fond
of citing Piltdown Man (a human skull with an
ape jaw) or Nebraska Man (the tooth
of a fossil pig).
Initially Professor McKenna specialized in studying the social behavior
of monkeys and
apes but the birth
of his son in 1978 he began to apply the principles
of human behavioral
evolution to the understanding
of human infancy.
In the context
of Darwin's theories
of evolution, the bones were re-examined by anatomist William King, who promptly named them Homo neanderthalensis, a name that provocatively (and incorrectly) suggested they were the missing link between
apes and humans.
A new study shows similar patterns in the
evolution of gut bacteria and the primates they live in, suggesting that germs and
apes could have helped shaped one another.
The fossil provides the most detailed look to date at a member
of a line
of African primates that are now candidates for central players in the
evolution of present - day
apes and humans.
Further studies
of casts
of the inner braincase, which show impressions from surface features
of the brain, may help clarify N. alesi's position in
ape evolution, Nengo says.
We began to take
evolution into our own hands, starting a series
of innovations that changed human history — and made us into the very modern
apes we are today (see timeline below).
«I'd go out on a limb and say not only that [interbreeding] played an important role in the
evolution of all living
apes, but that it shaped the
evolution of extinct ones as well.»
In addition to being the oldest known example
of an early primate skeleton, the new fossil is crucial in elucidating a pivotal event in primate and human
evolution — the evolutionary divergence that led to modern monkeys,
apes and humans (collectively known as anthropoids) on one branch, and to living tarsiers on the other.
Although it's not yet clear whether the acquired genes were ultimately beneficial or harmful, the finding strengthens the idea that such cross-species mating played an important role in the
evolution of the great
apes.
«Wild
apes are our outdoor lab for the
evolution of human culture,» says Van Schaik.
For this reason, a few anthropologists, such as David Begun at the University
of Toronto in Canada, have suggested that our
ape ancestors spent a formative period in Europe — although they still agree that later hominin
evolution, including that
of the australopithecines and the origin
of our own species, occurred solely in Africa.
The two Univerity
of Washington studies, «Great
ape genetic diversity and population history,» published in Nature, and «
Evolution and diversity
of copy number variation in the great
ape lineage,» published in Genome Research, are funded by NIH grant HG002385 and support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
The catalog
of great
ape genetic diversity, the most comprehensive ever, elucidates the
evolution and population histories
of great
apes from Africa and Indonesia.
The discovery came about while researchers were exploring and comparing the accumulation
of copy number variants during great
ape evolution.
The comparison with other sequenced genomes revealed that over the course
of great
ape evolution, about 90 %
of the genome has been influenced by natural selection.
Both
of these
apes may have something to tell us about the
evolution of human behavior, yet most research has focused on chimps, in large part because bonobos are endangered — perhaps as few as 10,000 remain.
Analysis
of great
ape genetic diversity is likely to reveal ways that natural selection, population growth and collapse, geographic isolation and migration, climate and geological changes, and other factors shaped primate
evolution.
Scally's group comes up with a date
of about 6 million years ago, adjusting what would have been a more recent estimate by assuming that the mutation rate slowed over time in
ape evolution.
Mysterious episodes
of genetic duplication in our great
ape ancestors may have paved the way for human
evolution
The results, published in the 28 October issue
of Science, will provide a better understanding
of the genetic flow that plays a role in the
evolution of great
apes.
«Ochman and colleagues show that human
evolution was accompanied by both a rapid divergence
of the microbiome from the microbiome
of apes, and a drastic loss
of diversity
of the microbial community,» says Thomas Bosch
of the Christian Albrechts University in Kiel, Germany.
«Monkeys moved into that
ape niche, in terms
of a dental pattern, but what exactly that means I don't know yet,» said Hlusko, a member
of UC Berkeley's Human
Evolution Research Center.
Comparison
of amino acid residues at these positions among various mammalian melanopsins suggests that melanopsins in
apes including humans have acquired and kept two residues destabilizing the bond with retinal in molecular
evolution.