The Tractarians regarded this as an assault on the episcopacy and indirectly on the concept
of apostolic succession.
One who affirms a doctrine
of apostolic succession culminating in the authority of the bishop of Rome must not only choose between succession of teaching or succession of office (as J. B. Lightfoot in his own day understood), but also surmount the historiographical difficulty posed by the early Church's transition from apostles to presbyters, and from presbyters to a single monarchical bishop.
Since the Protestant Reformation, the Roman Catholic magisterium has deployed its self - referential doctrine
of apostolic succession to portray Protestants as little more than heretics.
Bringing forth only fragments of our extended critique
of apostolic succession (and acting as if it constituted the whole), Wahlberg fails to realize both the nature and the extent of our criticism.
Failing to synthesize all the elements of our argument on the nature
of apostolic succession, Wahlberg writes that Collins and Walls
As I showed in my review, no appeal to consensus can achieve the aim that Collins and Walls have in mind, because there was broad consensus for at least a thousand years about the existence
of an apostolic succession in the episcopate — a doctrine that the authors consider themselves free to reject.
reject the idea
of apostolic succession in the episcopate.
But there is no idea here
of apostolic succession from Peter to the Pope.
We have our bishops and moderators and princes (or princesses) of the pulpit, but we have very little sense of or appreciation for the importance
of apostolic succession.
In a cultural environment where all authority is suspect and the notion of divine authority is thought to be a psychological hangover from the premodern world, the claim that divine authority is transmitted in an unbroken chain
of apostolic succession through the bishops of the Church in communion with the bishop of Rome seems literally incredible.
Not exact matches
In the U.S. today there are dozens
of lines
of «
apostolic succession» in which eccentric leaders with magnificent titles preside over tiny «Catholic» congregations in which almost everybody is a putative priest or bishop.
The link between western Christianity and the gospel was broken when the churches formed the doctrines
of the divine investiture
of kings and
apostolic succession without reference to the rights
of those who were not kings or apostles.
Yet even many so - called «Protestant» churches and denominations have their fair share
of problems even without
apostolic succession.
That continuity is rooted in
apostolic succession, by which the whole mystery
of Christ is handed on through the bishops.
The Catholic Church claims that the authority
of the Pope is based on
apostolic succession.
It is the religion
of reason, intelligence, and
apostolic succession.
How one gets to «
apostolic succession» from the supposed quotation referring to Peter is an example
of the miraculous.
It is misappropriated by those who are quick to claim «
apostolic succession» but slow about discerning the faithfulness
of clerical systems based on such claims to the «
apostolic teaching» that it was devised to safeguard.
Oddly, when Evangelicals say I'm not orthodox, they have to realize that Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox might say the same about them, since
apostolic succession and the primacy
of the bishops aren't small matters in those traditions.
William Nye, the Church
of England's most senior civil servant, told The Times bishops felt this was a «bearable anomaly» but others would be «concerned» that the proposal would break the «continuous
apostolic succession» that Anglican members believe links their clergy and bishops to the original followers
of Jesus Christ.
This does not mean that (for example) the Protestant denials
of real presence or transubstantiation are now compatible with orthodoxy, or that the need to «cite
apostolic succession» in relation to heterodox communities has ceased.
In the hands
of Rome, then,
apostolic succession functions as a self - justifying and ever - dividing myth.
For, most confusingly, his John Knox persona suddenly turns into the reincarnation
of Bishop Thomas Crammer, when, not forty pages later, he starts defending the hierarchy, albeit
of the Anglican variety: «Pope Benedict XVI,» Wills sneers, «when he was still Cardinal Ratzinger, wrote in 1998 that it is an infallible teaching
of the church that Anglican bishops and priests are fake bishops and priests, dispensing fake sacraments, because they are outside the
apostolic succession.»
There were questions about the papacy and
apostolic succession, about sin and grace, about the authority
of Scripture and tradition.
And, more than half a millennium later, when Paul came to Corinth to preach the gospel, the city was famous for its great temple
of Aphrodite, with its battalions
of «hierodules» who, we might say, stood in a valid «
apostolic succession» to the kedeshot
of Jeremiah's time.
Some Anglicans have made much
of the importance
of the «
apostolic succession».
This is a consistency guaranteed by the Lord himself: both in the unity
of his Person and in the unity
of his gift
of inerrancy to the Church through the
apostolic succession.
It accounts for the development
of the earliest form
of apostolic traditions and
apostolic succession among the early Church Fathers, particularly in Irenaeus» Against Heresies.
So many
of the earliest so - called Christian churches had different rites and beliefs; were led by bishops, patriarchs, or popes — not all under, what has become, the
apostolic succession of the bishop
of Rome.
Like his more speculative contemporary Ptolemy, a moderate Gnostic teacher, he undoubtedly thought
of himself as standing in «the
apostolic tradition» in a «
succession»
of teachers.24 Like pagan teachers and rabbis, Justin laid hands upon the head
of each disciple on the completion
of the course.25 At his trial, Justin, philosopher - prophet - teacher, describes the «school» where he has been teaching for the examining prefect, who will presently put him and several
of his students to death.
In the West, whose
apostolic see could claim the sanction
of both the prince and the prophet among the apostles, the tendency was rather to stress (in the tradition
of Clement
of Rome,
of Callistus,
of Tertullian,
of Cyprian,
of Ambrose, and
of Augustine) the Covenantal sanctions
of the ministry in
succession both to the apostles and to the Old Testament prophets and priests.
It was two outside churchmen who made the
apostolic claim for the teaching authority
of the see in Rome, namely: the Syrian Hegesippus, who was concerned to ascertain the true
apostolic doctrine as it was preserved in the episcopal
succession, notably in Rome up to Eleutherus (174 - 89); and especially the presbyter and later bishop
of Lyons, Irenaeus (d. 177 or 8).
The authority
of the sacerdos is derived by
apostolic succession from the incarnate Christ; the authority
of the episcopal propheta stems from the eternal Christ.
He provides us with a kind
of scholarly
apostolic succession which began in 1968 with him listening with one or two others to John Mason's lectures in the chapter house
of Oxford cathedral.