Among other things, it narrows the scope
of app permissions so they don't suck in as much user data automatically.
Rather than getting you to accept a long list
of app permissions when you install an app from the Play Store, Android 6.0 will instead present you with permission requests whenever an app needs to access something.
The new major Android release brings over a variety of neat features, such as native support for fingerprint sensors, a reinvented mobile payments solution called Android Pay, support for USB Type - C ports, smarter Google Now (including Google Now on Tap functionality), better control
of app permissions, and a slew of other improvements that will make Android an even more enjoyable experience for fans of the platform.
Marshmallow is going to add a lot of terrific looking features, including more granular control
of app permissions, support for the Android Pay mobile payments platform, native support for fingerprint scanning technology, the newly enhanced version of Google Play called Google Play on Tap, and the new Doze battery - saving mode.
This gives you a birds - eye view
of app permissions, and lets you see where your device might be vulnerable.
As I wrote last weekend, Facebook faced a legal challenge to the lax system
of app permissions it operated in 2011.
Of course, Android 6.0 Marshmallow has a wide range of goodies it comes with, among them things like Doze mode for better battery management, Google Now on Tap as well as effective management
of apps permissions, the updated Galaxy Note 4 received one very nifty feature.
Not exact matches
Had the rules been implemented, ISPs would have been required to get a customer's
permission before using and sharing information such as geolocation, financial information, health information, children's information, social security numbers, web browsing history,
app usage history and the content
of communications.
It's the cloud and these devices, that are personal, very powerful, a new set
of apps that make life better, help you, give you guidance — all with your
permission of course.»
Reporting on Spangenberg's claims follows recent changes to Uber's
app that effectively require users to give Uber
permission to track their location when the
app is running in the background
of a user's phone, according to The Verge.
On the corporate side, Facebook, which is not known for being an open platform, has developed such a reputation for privacy violations that the launch
of its Messenger
app was met with a huge wave
of revulsion, even though the
permissions being requested were really pretty standard.
Cambridge Analytica is accused
of obtaining the data
of 50 million Facebook users via a quiz
app without their
permission.
Facebook took most
of the criticism because
of its permissive
app permissions model that allowed Cambridge Analytica to collect data from friends
of app users, not just the
app users themselves.
Users can control the
permissions of apps individually,
of course, but even so it is the developers» responsibility to inform users what their software is doing, so an informed choice can be made.
«Facebook's current
app permissions leave billions
of its users vulnerable without knowing it,» it writes.
In the next month, we will show everyone a tool at the top
of your News Feed with the
apps you've used and an easy way to revoke those
apps»
permissions to your data.
It is also running a petition calling for Facebook to lock down
app permission settings to ensure users» privacy is «protected by default», saying the current default settings «leave a lot
of questions and a lot
of data flying around».
Mozilla has announced it's suspending its advertising on Facebook in the wake
of the Cambridge Analytica privacy controversy — saying it has concerns the current default privacy settings remain risky, and having decided to take a fresh look at Facebook's
app permissions following the latest user data handling scandal.
The result
of those data audits included a recommendation that Facebook tighten
app permissions on its platform, according to a spokesman for the Irish DPC, who we spoke to this week.
European privacy campaigner and lawyer Max Schrems — a long time critic
of Facebook — was actually raising concerns about the Facebook's lax attitude to data protection and
app permissions as long ago as 2011.
To be eligible for the bounty, the offending
app must impact more than 10,000 Facebook users and show a clear pattern
of abuse and not «collection» (in this case, I'm assuming abuse would qualify as transferring the data to a third party without
permission).
Since the data misuse scandal blew up last month, Facebook has said it is conducting a full audit
of any
apps which had access to «a large amount»
of information before it changed
app permissions on its platform in mid 2015 to prevent developers from being able to suck out data on Facebook users» friends.
According to SF Gate the company has been hit with four suits in federal courts so far this week following fresh revelations about how Facebook's
app permissions were abused to surreptitiously suck out vast amounts
of user data.
What's curious is that since March 17, 2018 — when the Guardian and New York Times published fresh revelations about the Cambridge Analytica scandal, estimating that around 50M Facebook users could have been affected — Facebook has released a steady stream
of statements and updates, including committing to a raft
of changes to tighten
app permissions and privacy controls on its platform.
«The consortium
of 40 + banks (known as R3cev) which aims to do just that will inevitably develop something which: is
permissioned (for users and developers like the apple
app store), privatized, has fees, will not be entirely transparent to everyone, will not be open - source, it will definitely be inflationary to accommodate monetary policy
of debasement and fractional reserve schemes, it will facilitate negative interest rates, central control
of accounts for suspension / freezing
of funds, bail - ins, bail outs, capital controls and transactions will include the identity
of both sender and receiver and store that information in a centralized location for the convenience
of hackers.»
The exodus comes in the wake
of what is Facebook's biggest controversy to date: Data belonging to 50 million Americans was harvested from a quiz
app created in 2013 called «thisisyourdigitallife» and then acquired without
permission by the political analytics firm Cambridge Analytica.
Uber says Apple gave it
permission to use the private entitlement and that it used it for an earlier version
of its Apple Watch
app to render maps on the iPhone.
Dubbed Facebook's «collapse»
of public trust, the double revelation that Cambridge Analytica, ostensibly a voter - profiling company, collected the data
of 50 million Facebook accounts without user
permission, and that thousands
of third - party developers built
apps on Facebook's platform to gather private information has spurred international outrage.
Facebook said it gave
permission to University
of Cambridge psychology professor Aleksandr Kogan to harvest information from users who downloaded his
app — «thisisyourdigitallife.»
Out
of the 5,855 Android
apps that are included in the Designed for Families program
of the Google Play Store, the study found that 28 percent
of them «accessed sensitive data protected by Android
permissions,» while an alarming 73 percent
of the
apps «transmitted sensitive data over the internet.»
Other crucial discoveries that were made under the study include 281
apps that collected the location or contact data
of children without asking for
permission from parents, and 1,100
apps that shared persistent identifying information that can be used for behavioral advertising methods that are banned to be used on children.
Facebook also reviews exactly what type
of permissions third parties request — in other words, tell me why you need to know someone's birthday for them to use your
app — as part
of the update to its API policies in 2015.
You can see which applications you gave
permission to in your Facebook account, but you can't see if, say, your data got harvested because a friend played a bunch
of apps.
On users part, to avoid such kind
of data breach being used to target you, you need to be a little more careful about the data
permissions you give to your connected
apps.
«Ask any consumer if they know why their free flashlight
app needs
permission to access their GPS, microphone or address book,» said McDonald, adding, «They may not fully know, and they don't remember giving the
permission; but we know full well what is going on and what the business model is
of that flashlight
app.»
To take the quiz, 270,000 people gave the
app permission to access data via Facebook on themselves and their friends, exposing a network
of 50 million people, according to the New York Times.
More than 1 million Obama supporters signed up for a Facebook
app, giving the campaign
permission to look at their lists
of friends.
This was done through an
app that only a couple
of hundred thousand Facebook users installed, but due to the
permissions of the Facebook API at the time, this
app was also able to access each
of these user's friends's data.
Previously, he was co-director
of Global Science Research, the company that obtained information on Facebook users and their friends through
permissions they gave a personality quiz
app.
• Getting
permission to rent out our apartment while we are gone [low — because
of all the boring paper work, but High because we finally got the approval] • Releasing a Christmas update for our
app (it will be out any day now)[High] • Getting new passports [Low — we always manage to fill in something wrong on those damn forms] • Cleaning the bathroom drain [Ultra low] • Finding some home exchanges in Australia & NZ [High — we have found a few trades that will make it a bit less restraining on our budget].
Keep an eye on
apps, especially those which require you to log in using your Facebook account — they often have a very wide range
of permissions and many are specifically designed to pick up your data
The company started showing everyone a list
of the
apps they have used and ways to revoke
permission to share data with them.
The demands came in response to news reports Saturday about how the firm, Cambridge Analytica, used a feature once available to Facebook
app developers to collect information on 270,000 people and, in the process, gain access to data on tens
of millions
of their Facebook «friends» — few, if any,
of whom had given explicit
permission for this sharing.
Issues on the table include caps on outside income for lawmakers, term limits and
permission for ridesharing
apps like Uber to operate in the state outside
of New York City.
To its credit, it's changed
app permissions so that developers can no longer access such a wide network
of profiles.
An analysis
of more than 100,000 Android
apps has found that they sometimes collude with each other to obtain information without
permission.
Without my
permission, they passed my personal information to a Facebook
app called «This Is Your Digital Life», which eventually ended up in the hands
of Cambridge Analytica, the company famed for using questionable tactics in an effort to influence election campaigns.
People who used the TIYDL
app gave it
permission to access their friend's Facebook public profile page, date
of birth, current city and pages they had liked.
The code to launch these attacks — which included passcode cracking, interference with or control
of telephony functionality, and sending tweets without the user's
permission — could be embedded within third - party
apps that were available in the iTunes store.
But often
permission for such access is buried in terms -
of - use agreements — the small print that many users don't read — or comes up not when the
app is downloaded but later, unbeknownst to the user, when access for that information kicks into gear.