Among them, one can find foreign ownership and control, outsourcing and offshoring, preservation of and access to our legal heritage, access to French and English translations
of appellate court decisions on subjects of national interest, the definition of a public document, copyright in compilations, and government funding.
In the wake
of an appellate court decision, Spa City's charter change advocates are once again trying to get their hands on electronic images of ballots cast in November's charter referendum that was defeated by a narrow 10 - vote margin.
That's my take on «Legal Win for Hells Angels,» Mike Cernovich's report
of an appellate court decision affirming a district court's denial in part of motions for qualified immunity filed by seven San Jose police officers and one deputy sheriff.
Not exact matches
What appears to have been a carefully crafted strategy then unfolded: The state authorities acted; Griswold and Buxton were charged, tried, convicted, and fined $ 100 each; and the lower
court decision was upheld by the relevant Connecticut appellate courts (including the splendidly named «Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors&raq
court decision was upheld by the relevant Connecticut
appellate courts (including the splendidly named «Connecticut Supreme
Court of Errors&raq
Court of Errors»).
Atty. Zelda Soriano, Legal Counsel for the Petitioners discussed the grounds on which the
appellate court based their favorable
decision, which includes the main argument
of the petitioners that the field testing is characterized by «serious scientific uncertainty with regard to its health and environmental effects.»
Latin has finished construction
of more than half
of the $ 2 million artificial soccer field.The one - paragraph ruling from the
appellate court says no construction or excavation can occur on the field until a decision is reached by the Cook County Circuit C
court says no construction or excavation can occur on the field until a
decision is reached by the Cook County Circuit
CourtCourt.
This DEC action comes on the heels
of a recent New York State
appellate court decision that reinstated criminal indictments against another concrete company, Quality Concrete, also located on Newtown Creek.
«While we are disappointed in the
decision and will weigh our
appellate options, we look forward to a prompt retrial where we will have another opportunity to present the overwhelming evidence
of Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos's guilt and again give the public the justice it deserves,» Acting US Attorney Joon H. Kim announced Tuesday following the circuit
court's
decision.
ALBANY — The corruption convictions
of former state Senate Republican Majority Leader Dean G. Skelos and his son Adam B. Skelos were overturned by a federal
appellate court on Tuesday in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court decision that retooled the definition of an «official act» as it relates to public corrup
court on Tuesday in the wake
of a U.S. Supreme
Court decision that retooled the definition of an «official act» as it relates to public corrup
Court decision that retooled the definition
of an «official act» as it relates to public corruption.
The NYCLU — along with Public Advocate Letitia James, the Legal Aid Society, the NAACP and the New York Post — filed the appeal in the
appellate division
of New York Supreme
Court to overturn a judge's
decision not to release testimony from the grand jury.
«The agency is similarly concerned with the tone
of the district
court's
decision, which equates the difficult work ICE professionals do every day to enforce our immigration laws with «treatment we associate with regimes we revile as unjust,» and is actively exploring its
appellate options.»
A New York
appellate court has ruled in favor
of the NYPD's
decision NOT to release the addresses
of gun permit holders» to the NY Times newspaper.
«The District
Court's charge, encompassing «any action taken or to be taken under color
of official authority,» was overbroad,» the
appellate decision states.
Here's the
decision by four
appellate court judges — two Democrats and two Republicans — dismissing Sen. Craig Johnson's appeal of a Dec. 4 ruling of State Supreme Court Justice Ira Warshawsky that handed the 7th SD race to Republican Jack Mar
court judges — two Democrats and two Republicans — dismissing Sen. Craig Johnson's appeal
of a Dec. 4 ruling
of State Supreme
Court Justice Ira Warshawsky that handed the 7th SD race to Republican Jack Mar
Court Justice Ira Warshawsky that handed the 7th SD race to Republican Jack Martins.
ALBANY — An
appellate court has overturned a
decision denying allies
of Gov. Andrew Cuomo control
of the Women's Equality Party in Nassau County.
For trial
court judges, the prospect
of appellate review
of their
decisions partially mitigates the risk
of a judge making bad
decisions due to declining intellectual capacity.
By so doing, he is making himself a superintendent and overseer and an
appellate court over
decisions of a
court of competent jurisdiction which under a constitutional democracy like ours and under the rule
of law can never be possible.»
Making reference to the
Courts Act
of 1993 (Act 459), Mr Justice Ofoe said Section 31 (2) holds that «an
appellate court, on hearing an appeal in a criminal case, shall allow the appeal if the
appellate court considers (a) that the verdict or conviction or acquittal ought to be set aside on the ground that it is unreasonable or can not be supported having regard to the evidence, or (b) that the judgement in question ought to be set aside as a wrong
decision on a question
of law or fact, or (c) that there was a miscarriage
of justice, and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal.»
A state
appellate court panel has upheld a lower
court's
decision to toss a lawsuit brought by conservative activist Robert Schulz that attempted to shape the makeup
of a state constitutional convention — if the people
of New York ever decide to hold another one, that is.
According to the
Court of Appeal, Metuh and his company failed to first obtain the leave of either the trial court or the appellate court before filing a notice of appeal as required by the constitution when filing an appeal against an interlocutory decision, on the grounds of mixed law and f
Court of Appeal, Metuh and his company failed to first obtain the leave
of either the trial
court or the appellate court before filing a notice of appeal as required by the constitution when filing an appeal against an interlocutory decision, on the grounds of mixed law and f
court or the
appellate court before filing a notice of appeal as required by the constitution when filing an appeal against an interlocutory decision, on the grounds of mixed law and f
court before filing a notice
of appeal as required by the constitution when filing an appeal against an interlocutory
decision, on the grounds
of mixed law and facts.
I'm very grateful that the
appellate courts agreed with me, but I could have used a better choice
of words to describe by reaction to the original
decision.»
Silver was convicted
of using his political influence for political favors; the conviction was tossed last summer, when
appellate judges in the 2nd Circuit ruled that the definition
of «official acts» had been changed by a previous Supreme
Court decision in the public corruption case
of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell.
Erie County's top prosecutor is appealing an
appellate court decision that reversed the murder conviction
of a man found guilty
of killing his then - girlfriend's 5 - year - old son.
Carver said his lawyers also are weighing whether to appeal Wednesday's ruling, but the state
Court of Appeals must give permission after the unanimous
appellate decision.
BY LEGAL LARRY The controversial development
of a parcel in Ramapo known as Patrick Farm was again the subject
of recent
appellate court decisions.
The corruption convictions
of former state Senate Republican Majority Leader Dean Skelos and his son, Adam, were overturned by a federal
appellate court in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court decision that retooled the definition of an «official act» as it relates to public corrup
court in the wake
of a U.S. Supreme
Court decision that retooled the definition of an «official act» as it relates to public corrup
Court decision that retooled the definition
of an «official act» as it relates to public corruption.
The governor, through his counsel, Mr Victor Paul, prayed the
appellate court to set aside the
decision of the lower
court.
While upholding the
decision of the lower
court, the
appellate court declared that there was nothing wrong with the lower
court hearing both the substantive and the preliminary objection simultaneously.
«We are happy that the
appellate court saw reasons with the
decision of the lower
court and upheld it by dismissing the appeal
of Gov. Lalong,» he told the News Agency
of Nigeria (NAN).
In light
of the new Supreme
Court decision, the appellate court decided the jury had been wrongly instructed and that if they had taken into account the revised definition, they may not have found Silver gu
Court decision, the
appellate court decided the jury had been wrongly instructed and that if they had taken into account the revised definition, they may not have found Silver gu
court decided the jury had been wrongly instructed and that if they had taken into account the revised definition, they may not have found Silver guilty.
Aminu Sule Lamido, the 34 year old son
of former Jigawa State governor, Alhaji Sule Lamido, had his appeal struck out on Monday by an
appellate court sitting in Kaduna against the decision of the Federal High Court, Kano which found him guilty of the charge of money laundering brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission,
court sitting in Kaduna against the
decision of the Federal High
Court, Kano which found him guilty of the charge of money laundering brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission,
Court, Kano which found him guilty
of the charge
of money laundering brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.
(The Supreme
Court later limited a portion
of the
appellate decision, offering some vindication for Mr. Bharara.)
ZUG, Switzerland; CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts; BERKELEY, California; DUBLIN, Ireland; July 25, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE)-- CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ: CRSP), Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTLA), Caribou Biosciences, Inc. and ERS Genomics, Ltd. announced that The Regents
of the University
of California, the University
of Vienna, and Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively «UC»), co-owners
of foundational intellectual property relating to CRISPR / Cas9 genome engineering, today submitted an
appellate brief to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the «Federal Circuit») seeking reversal
of a
decision by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB») in an interference proceeding relating to CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing technology.
The
appellate panel reached that
decision even though the district judge had based the dismissal on a 1989 U.S. Supreme
Court decision that was overturned last year by the Congress's adoption
of the new civil - rights...
The
Court's 5 - to - 4 decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate - court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for t
Court's 5 - to - 4
decision in Board
of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an
appellate -
court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for t
court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district
court for t
court for trial.
A reissued
decision in the Topeka, Kan., school - desegregation suit gives a more detailed picture
of a federal
appellate panel's deep division over the need for continued
court supervision in the historic case.
In an Oct. 23
decision, the
appellate court upheld the 800 - student Oakridge school district's
decision in the fall
of 2000 to drop Ginelle Weber, who was 15 at the time, from the school's volleyball team after she and her parents refused to consent to a random urinalysis.
She pointed out that the California Teachers Association has racked up three wins since spring, with the
appellate court's unanimous ruling to overturn Vergara, the Supreme Court's decision this week to decline to review the case and the thwarting of her own bill that would have made changes to teacher tenure and dismissal proced
court's unanimous ruling to overturn Vergara, the Supreme
Court's decision this week to decline to review the case and the thwarting of her own bill that would have made changes to teacher tenure and dismissal proced
Court's
decision this week to decline to review the case and the thwarting
of her own bill that would have made changes to teacher tenure and dismissal procedures.
O. Any final and definitive
decision of an administrative law judge, or in the case such
decision is appealed, a final and definitive judgment
of an
appellate court, issued in connection with any hearing held pursuant to this Chapter and the Administrative Procedure Act shall be considered a valid and final judgment that may be made executory by the commissioner in accordance with the Code
of Civil Procedure.
Following a broadly structured
decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals to vacate the DOL fiduciary rule expansion, the National Association for Fixed Annuities decided its own
appellate challenge has been made unnecessary.
But it also smothers an ordinance already adopted in Tucson that had been placed on hold awaiting a federal
appellate court decision on the rights
of cities to enact such rules.
That is a central issue in a recent lawsuit by Southeastern Legal Foundation (SLF), the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a host
of lawmakers and several companies, who are petitioning the Supreme
Court to review an appellate court decision upholding the EPA's global warming regulat
Court to review an
appellate court decision upholding the EPA's global warming regulat
court decision upholding the EPA's global warming regulations.
I clicked on the «Settled Principles» tab to find 30 well - settled principles for public records, such as this statement from a California
appellate decision, «[I] t is well established that the media has no greater right
of access to public records than the general public,» and this from a Florida
court, «It is well - settled that public records and reports or business records are admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule provided they are authenticated by a custodian.»
News.lawreader.com has summaries
of Kentucky cases, federal
appellate decisions, U.S. Supreme
Court decisions, and professional ethics cases.
The underlying issue for an appeal is simple: the
appellate court (AC), ie Court of Appeal; a High Court judge; a circuit judge etc) may only allow an appeal if it considers the decision below was «wrong» (r 52.11 (3)-RRB-: wrong in law, wrong on the facts or because the judge exercised his discretion wrongly («plainly wrong»: Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, [1999] 2 FLR 763); or unjust because of a procedural irregula
court (AC), ie
Court of Appeal; a High Court judge; a circuit judge etc) may only allow an appeal if it considers the decision below was «wrong» (r 52.11 (3)-RRB-: wrong in law, wrong on the facts or because the judge exercised his discretion wrongly («plainly wrong»: Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, [1999] 2 FLR 763); or unjust because of a procedural irregula
Court of Appeal; a High
Court judge; a circuit judge etc) may only allow an appeal if it considers the decision below was «wrong» (r 52.11 (3)-RRB-: wrong in law, wrong on the facts or because the judge exercised his discretion wrongly («plainly wrong»: Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, [1999] 2 FLR 763); or unjust because of a procedural irregula
Court judge; a circuit judge etc) may only allow an appeal if it considers the
decision below was «wrong» (r 52.11 (3)-RRB-: wrong in law, wrong on the facts or because the judge exercised his discretion wrongly («plainly wrong»: Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, [1999] 2 FLR 763); or unjust because
of a procedural irregularity.
The blog also provides free access to the Illinois Insurance Index, a database maintained by Jill Berkeley that summarizes all major
appellate insurance coverage
decisions in Illinois, the 7th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals, and a few other jurisdictions, issued from 1986 through the present.»
In the U.S. Federal
appellate courts, and maybe all
of the state
appellate courts, they have a procedure (as I understand it) by which a judge
of the
appellate court who wasn't on the hearing panel can request the full
court reconsider the
decision.
I expect we will see a burst
of inconsistent lower
court judgments early in the new year followed by some significant
appellate decisions in the spring.
West Virginia's poor showing, something it has gotten quite used to over the years, was again largely attributed to its unique status as the only state with no intermediate
appellate court, and thus no automatic appeal rights from the
decision of a trial
court.
It also noted that trial and
appellate courts were «not entirely powerless» because a judgment may be vacated if «there is no evidence to support the jury's
decision,» and because «
appellate review is available to test the sufficiency
of the jury instructions.»