Sentences with phrase «of appellate matters»

His civil appellate practice focuses on a broad range of appellate matters involving individuals, businesses and municipalities.

Not exact matches

Just how that charge is to be exercised is nowhere indicated in the text, and the possibility remains, therefore, that outside the Latin church the jurisdiction will be exercised via the patriarchs and ruling synods of the Oriental churches — normally, by way of reaction, namely, in the event of patriarchs or ruling synods calling on the pope for mediation in some dispute («appellate» jurisdiction), and abnormally, in the pope taking some initiative to bring a matter to the attention of such patriarchs and synods.

The firm represents clients in a wide variety of litigation and appellate matters, including matters involving real property, real estate finance, construction, development disputes and transactions, intellectual property disputes, business disputes, personal injury, fraud, shareholder disputes, and adversarial actions in bankruptcy court.

Jonathan Lippman, who was chief judge of the state Court of Appeals from 2009 through last year, has joined the New York office of Latham & Watkins LLP, where he will provide expertise on state law and appellate matters while remaining a high - profile advocate on the public policy issues.

Consequently, in his her short ruling, Justice Olatoregun said: «As a result of the appeal notice that has been entered, coupled with the hearing notice slated for July 5, I am inclined to grant an adjournment in this matter for parties to ventilate their views in the appellate court.»

Before joining DOT, Mr. Bradbury was a litigation partner at Dechert LLP in Washington, D.C., where his practice focused on regulatory enforcement and investigations, rulemaking and judicial review of agency actions, appellate cases, and antitrust matters.

A victory on «no - malice - on - this - theory» grounds... if it's won as a matter of law before the appellate court... says to Mann, «You can't make people do anything (except laugh at you) by suing them.

In one province (not Alberta), there are so many appellate decisions condemning the practice, but not ordering a new trial, that one wonders whether the prosecutors there think that it is a matter of «Do as I say, not as I do.»

[M] aybe divisions of appellate courts think that if they ignore their own precedents they won't get called on this by their colleagues, especially if a judge on the appellate panel was part of the panel deciding the precedents; or there's nobody outside the court (who might matter) to to complain because it's an appellate court of final resort; or it's an inferior appellate court but the panel has good reason to believe the final appellate court won't grant leave to appeal.Whatever the reason, such judicial conduct unacceptable.

Taking into consideration the lack of evidence in the record of this case with regard to the landlord's knowledge of the vicious propensities of the dog, the conflicting studies about how best to control the dog bite «epidemic» mentioned herein, and the problems inherent in defining what constitutes a «mixed - breed» pit bull, the matter of creating a new standard of liability is fraught with problems and is beyond the sphere of resolution by any appellate court.

His practice focuses on Supreme Court and wider appellate matters, with experience acting for universities, governmental entities and corporations in a broad spectrum of disputes work.

Acted as appellate counsel in cases where the firm was not trial counsel, including matters involving complex commercial litigation and novel issues of law.

We have appeared in hundreds of matters in various appellate courts resulting in hundreds of published opinions.

Our lawyers provide integrated counsel for plaintiffs and defendants in a broad spectrum of matters, with particular focus on contract and business torts, appellate, intellectual property, and antitrust and securities litigation for clients involved in the energy, technology and finance industries.

Firm partner Bradley C. Nahrstadt concentrates on the defense of Chicago product liability claims in both state and federal courts, as well as handling matters at the appellate level.

Prior to her tenure at Campbell Law, Ms. Webb - Shackleford practiced for nearly nine years as a corporate attorney at the Raleigh office of McGuireWoods LLP, representing commercial entities in a variety of business litigation, employment, and appellate matters.

Areas of expertise include arbitration, construction law, employment contracts, government contracts, agency, U.C.C. matters, arbitration issues, corporate formation, franchises, unfair trade practices, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and motion and appellate practice.

Nicole also counsels clients on appellate matters utilizing her previous experience as lead law clerk to the Honorable Frank J. Williams during his tenure as Chief Justice of the Rhode Island Supreme Court.

David is Senior Research Scholar in Law and Floyd Abrams Clinical Lecturer in Law at Yale Law School, Co-Director of the Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic there, is also a Partner in the law firm Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, a national trial and appellate practice representing news and entertainment media in defamation, privacy, newsgathering, access, intellectual property and related First Amendment matters.

Mr. Carter's practice involves representation of clients in appellate matters.

He has written briefs and handled oral arguments in 15 appellate matters in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the Maryland Court of Appeals and Court of Special Appeals, and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

We've represented clients before mediators, arbitrators, trial courts, and appellate courts for matters of every shape and size.

Mr. Scott practice centers upon civil litigation at the trial and appellate levels in a broad range of commercial matters including oil and gas litigation, and financial and real estate litigation.

But know that no matter what, appellate writing is not really creative writing — it's almost a mathematical logic proof — so there are limits to the amount of irrelevant babble you can insert in your brief without pissing off the judges.

I would typically spend 4 - 8 hours preparing for a half day hearing, and sometimes more depending on the subject matter, and would spend a similar or greater amount of time preparing for an oral argument of half an hour in an appellate court plus time in court waiting for my client's turn.

By way of example, she noted that 85 % of family law matters in Connecticut currently involve a pro se litigant, as do one in every four civil matters generally, and two in every five appellate cases.

Representative matters include civil jury trials and bench trials in both state and federal court; complex civil litigation involving the energy industry, including defense of class actions; condemnations and surface damage disputes; and appellate work.

Mr. Cacace has represented clients in a wide range of matters in state and federal trial and appellate courts, including business litigation, intellectual property disputes, product liability actions, consumer class actions, and real estate disputes.

He has handled a wide range of matters in state and federal trial and appellate courts, including white collar criminal defense, business disputes, and commercial real estate cases.

The appellate court determined that attorney was entitled to routine trial costs of $ 12,983.99 as a matter of right under an unopposed costs memorandum.

Chris provides business and corporate advice, including advice related to sales and acquisitions, commercial leasing, contracts, real estate conveyance and financing; broad commercial litigation representation including contracts and other business disputes, commercial and residential construction defect claims, religious entity law, advice regarding employment disputes and compliance, including ADA, ADEA, Title VII, Colorado Wage Act, FLSA compliance, and administrative proceedings before EEOC and DORA - Colorado Civil Rights Division; representation in administrative proceedings, C.R.C.P. 106 (a)(4) appeals and interlocutory appeals regarding governmental immunity, defense and pursuit of 42 USC § 1983 actions in federal and state court; representation of public pension funds in litigation and administrative matters; and appellate practice before the Colorado Court of Appeals, Colorado Supreme Court, and the 10th Circuit.

Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.'s team of reputable Phoenix appellate practice lawyers carefully analyze appellate practice disputes to form sound case strategies to resolve the client's legal matter.

Ryan Teschner is a member of Heenan Blaikie's Litigation group in Toronto with a litigation and advocacy practice that emphasizes administrative, regulatory and constitutional law matters, including appellate litigation and judicial review.

He has 35 years» experience in the litigation of complex criminal and civil matters, with particular emphasis and success in appellate matters.

Michael S. Lieberman is a founding partner whose many years of practice include the successful litigation of numerous complex civil and criminal matters with a particular emphasis in the federal and state appellate court system.

Anthony J. Scaffidi represents a wide variety of clients across numerous legal fields, including medical malpractice, personal injury, negligence, labor law, real estate, corporate, and commercial law, as well as other complex litigation and transactional matters, at both the trial and appellate court levels.

«In short, the plaintiffs have failed — both as a matter of statutory interpretation and as a matter of facts alleged — to state a claim that the [FHFA] acted outside its authority as a conservator and thereby lost the protection of section 4617 (f),» according to the appellate panel.

We recognize that the majority of IP litigation involves trial and appellate work in the patent area, but it also includes trademark, trade secret, antitrust and unfair competition matters, as well as multi-country patent litigation.

She has experience handling all phases of litigation, including pretrial, mediation, motion practice, trial, post-judgment, and appellate matters.

His practice covers a full range of IP matters and he is involved in most of Brooks Kushman «s appellate work;

The group also includes John Duffy, a highly distinguished Professor of torts and patent law at the University of Virginia School of Law, who brings his considerable legal and appellate expertise to the group's wide range of challenging, complex matters.

In her appellate practice, she has prepared briefs in courts for the Eighth and Eleventh Circuits, the Missouri Supreme Court and the Missouri Court of Appeals on matters involving product liability, insurance coverage, ERISA and the False Claims Act.

Lauren represents public and private companies and individuals in a broad range of matters, including business, real estate, property development, construction and employment litigation in state and federal trial and appellate courts.

He frequently litigates business disputes and issues relating to supply network and distribution matters, as well as disputes involving contracts, business torts, trade secrets, trade dress, covenants not to compete, and enforcement of intellectual property rights before state and federal trial and appellate courts, including arbitration panels.

In his almost three decades of appellate experience, Jim has represented parties and amici on appeal in matters involving constitutional and civil rights claims, defamation cases, environmental / CEQA, probate disputes, securities fraud, and consumer rights, just to name a few.

Much of the firm's appellate work is referred by other lawyers and law firms seeking our assessment of the matter.

He handles a wide range of litigation, trial, and appellate matters, including national and international case coordination, product liability, professional malpractice, business, real estate, and insurance law.

He spends most of his time on post trial and appellate matters and focuses on patent cases and other disputes involving complex technology or complicated statutes.

When answering that question, we consider the five Florida appellate court decisions below that ruled, as a matter of law, on the issue of whether or not a jury's award of pain and suffering damages were inadequate.

The court's straightforward application of the statutory bar to appellate review of remand orders based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction rejects the notion that the AIA somehow creates an exception to that longstanding bar to appellate review.