Sentences with phrase «of appellees»

Michael is quoted and identified as counsel for many of the appellees.

Each of appellees» possible theories of wealth discrimination is founded on the assumption that the quality of education varies directly with the amount of funds expended on it, and that, therefore, the difference in quality between two schools can be determined simplistically by looking at the difference in per - pupil expenditures.

As it relates to this case, Dr. Curry has been critical of Appellee Michael Mann's methodological approach to climate science and the conclusions he has reached.

The representative of the appellant argues that the judgment of the original court which acknowledged the jurisdiction of the Japanese court in an action of the appellee who is a Japanese national claiming divorce in the present case against the appellant who has a nationality of the German Democratic Republic is against the law.

Oral Argument presented by Neil Popović, on behalf of appellee Alan Wofsy.

filed Jan. 23, 2017); Reply Brief of Appellants to Brief of Appellee Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2017 WL 2211289 (3d Cir.

Not exact matches

Upon the Petition of Robert L. Burham, Appellant, and concerning Carla M. Burham, Appellee.

CONCERNED CITIZENS OF SOUTHEAST POLK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and SOUTHEAST POLK COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Intervenor - Appellant, vs. CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, and CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, Defendants - AppelleeOF SOUTHEAST POLK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and SOUTHEAST POLK COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Intervenor - Appellant, vs. CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, and CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, Defendants - AppelleeOF EDUCATION, Intervenor - Appellant, vs. CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, and CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, Defendants - AppelleeOF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, and CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, Defendants - Appelleeof the CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, Defendants - AppelleeOF PLEASANT HILL, IOWA, Defendants - Appellees.

The Court added, in failing to create the recall list, the appellees lost the opportunity for employment for a minimum of two years.»

Alex Smith, Gurda, Gurda & Smith, Middletown, NY (Robert N. Isseks, Middletown, NY, of counsel), for Plaintiff - Appellee - Cross-Appellant Santina Polera.

The debt in question originated shortly after appellee's graduation from chiropractic college with the disbursement of a $ 35,322.81 consolidated student loan.5 Appellee made approximately ten years» of payments towards this debt, but defaulted after she becappellee's graduation from chiropractic college with the disbursement of a $ 35,322.81 consolidated student loan.5 Appellee made approximately ten years» of payments towards this debt, but defaulted after she becAppellee made approximately ten years» of payments towards this debt, but defaulted after she became ill.

Appellee matriculated through Northwestern College of Chiropractic.

1987).9 Whether declining to discharge appellee's student loans would impose on her «undue hardship» under 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(8)(B) is a question of law.

Lastly, appellee covers her tuition costs — related to her pursuit of a four - year degree — which vary depending on the particular course, credits, and college.4

It reasoned that requiring appellee's ECMC loan repayment would essentially impose a «sentence of [twenty - five] years in payments on an obligation that she could never realistically expect to retire or reduce.»

Appellee's monthly wage covers all of her existing expenses.

At some point in 1993, appellee began to experience extreme fatigue, depression, and diminution of her mental faculties.

ECMC argues that the Bankruptcy Court erred in its determination that repayment of the debt would impose an «undue hardship» on appellee.

Under the ICRP, the Department of Education will cancel any balance the appellee owed on her total student loan obligation — HEAL or ECMC — after twenty - five years of repayment has occurred.

Conversely, the Bankruptcy Court also noted that «there is some good reason to believe that [appellee] will ultimately get herself substantially out of this unfortunate situation and circumstance.»

RICHARD J. BAKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, UBISOFT, INC., NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., ELECTRONIC ARTS INC, HARMONIX MUSIC SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants - Appellees, MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT, Defendant.

The Court of Appeals of Arizona granted review of Anthony Toth, Petitioner - Appellee, v. Gloria Snyder Toth, Respondent - Appellant to consider whether an equitable distribution of marital assets would require that -LSB-...]

If you are the appellee, your brief should contain the same elements as the appellant's brief but does not need a statement of the case (see V.R.A.P. 28 (b) at Lexis Nexis).

If the opposing party in your case appeals a final ruling of a trial court or agency or board, that party is the «appellant» and you are the «appellee.»

In this slip and fall action, the trial court granted Appellee Wal - Mart's motion for summary judgment based on the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact that Wal - Mart had actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition.In this slip and fall action, the trial court granted Appellee Wal - Mart's motion for summary judgment based on the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact that Wal - Mart had actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition.

the appellee here «was put to a Hobson's choice»: decline to testify and lose the opportunity of conveying his version of the facts to the jury, or take the stand and forego his fundamental right to be assisted by counsel.

The chancellor found that appellee's interest in Wal - Mart stock options that could not yet be exercised were not marital property but compensated appellant with an award of alimony.

The [appellees] have requested this court take judicial notice of the unpublished opinion of the California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three (Augustson v. Texaco (Sept. 9, 2008, B202633)[nonpub.

Represented the plaintiff - appellee at the U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals in obtaining affirmance of substantially all of the district court judgment in excess of $ 4 million in an employment retaliation case.

The first question which arises in this cause, is an objection to the jurisdiction of the court below, made by the appellees, on the ground of the want of proper parties; and that the state of Massachusetts, being now the owners of the bridge, pursuant to the terms of the charter to the defendants, no suit could be sustained which can affect their interest in it.

In regards to the marriage of Roger E. Thompson (Petitioner / Appellant) and Tanya F. Thompson (Respondent / Appellee), under Arizona Revised Statute 25 - 408, a parent granted joint custody and legal decision making or parenting time is granted the right to a minimum of 60 days of advanced notice prior to a relocation of the minor child by the other parent «more than 100 miles within the state.»

Appellees, Playtime Theatres, Inc., and Sea - First Properties, Inc., filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington seeking a declaratory judgment that the Renton ordinance violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and a permanent injunction against its enforcement.

After calculating the average number of intensifiers per page (the «intensifier rate»), Long and Christensen found no statistically significant relationship between intensifier rate and case outcome in appellee's briefs.

The Court of Appeals was «willing to assume for purposes of this appeal that appellees have shown that Test 21 is predictive of further progress in Recruit School.»

What if the appellee has caught you in some mistake, perhaps even a conclusive mistake, on one of the arguments in your initial brief?

Also contains more than 350,000 case documents, including appellant's and appellee's briefs, oral transcripts, and petitions for writ of certiorari.

Appellants win only 8 % of the time, while appellees win 32 % of the time; only about 20 % of bankruptcy appeals settle.

The next two top appellees are Wells Fargo and Bank of America; The U.S. Government / IRS is ranked fifth.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party, or neither party from counsel for the appellees received.

ROBERT JENEVEIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SEANA WILLING, Acting Executive Director of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; R.C. ALLEN, III, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; ELIZABETH COATES, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; JOSEPH B. MORRIS, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; KATHLEEN H. OLIVARES, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; MONICA GONZALEZ, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; JAMES A. HALL, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; RONALD D. KRIST, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; FAYE BARKSDALE, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct; HONORABLE REX G. BAKER, III; HONORABLE MICHAEL FIELDS; W.A. «BUCK» PREWITT, Commissioner of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Defendants - Appellees.

Geoffrey Hoffman was among a group of legal scholars who submitted an amici curiae brief in support of the plaintiff - appellee in the case of City of Chicago v. Sessions.

Furthermore, appellant seemed to have little understanding of the effect his feelings towards appellee might have on the girls» feelings about their mother.

The psychologist agreed and recommended that Appellee have sole parental control and that psychological therapy continue with a single therapist with the ultimate goal of bettering the relationship between the children and Appellant.»

108, 113, 953 S.W. 2d 596, 598 (1997)... With the interest of Maegan as our primary concern, we reverse the chancellor's order awarding the parties joint custody and remand the case to the chancellor to enter an award granting primary custody to appellant with liberal visitation rights to appellee.»

Dr. Fisher testified that appellee's behavior toward Heather exhibited symptoms of «parental alienation syndrome.

The court did not abuse its discretion in naming appellee the residential parent, as there was evidence of both parties engaging in alienation.»