Not exact matches
He's since
pointed out that the popular understanding
of this maxim is generally oversimplified, but that doesn't undermine the essence
of the
argument — sustained effort over time is a hallmark
of greatness.
The
arguments for deleting your account as your 2017 New Year's resolution are strong indeed, as Jake Swearingen
points out in Select / All: Facebook was the chief venue for the spread
of misleading fake news and pro-Russian propaganda that confused voters and may have helped tip the presidential election to Donald Trump.
The twins»
argument is that people are missing the
point when they try to think
of cryptocurrencies in terms
of person - to - person transactions.
Now, you may or may not find that to be a persuasive
argument about the state
of income inequality in Canada — as our own Chris MacDonald has
pointed out, determining the fairness
of CEO pay is more complicated than it seems.
«Retailers should brace for a backlash... The more people rely on these
points and closer they are to value, the more an
argument for lots
of notice and some rules about convertibility sound sensible.»
The worry is that businesses exposed to such
arguments will come to think
of ethics from a purely instrumental
point of view: we'll act ethically only because, and only to the extent, that it's good for profits.
Rush casts its net wide; there's a macroeconomic
argument woven through the book that makes the case against taxation structures that are redistributive to the
point of dampening the urge to succeed.
Perhaps Facebook simply sees China's side
of this
argument, and has adopted their
point of view in the hopes
of one day finding big profits in Asia's largest market.
For me, though I learned a lot in college, the skill I continue to use on a daily basis in my consulting business is the ability to look at my own
argument or
point of view and examine why someone else might have a different perspective.
The
point of the ad is to make the
argument that some
of the big game's festivities should carry over into the day after the Super Bowl.
Some conservatives tried to fight back against Trump, pleading with their audiences to see what they contended to be the rational
point of view, but their
arguments seemed to go unheard.
from the Bitcoin world (which had a monumental impact on the community and signaled the «blowing up»
point of this
argument), he initiated the Bitcoin XT hard fork for the following reasons:
My
argument is that a significant part
of the strong productivity performance in the two decades before the crisis was due to globalization, and that the globalization process may have brought trade in the global economy to a new balancing
point.
The one major
point in favor
of your
argument that you didn't highlight is that most people using a Roth IRA assume that they'll make more money in the future than they do today, thus realizing a lower tax rate by paying taxes now than they would have in the future (even assuming tax rates stay constant).
«I think it is usually when you have a
point of maximum fear that you have got the greatest opportunities, so the Chinese market is so large and so deep that you can't just make an
argument out
of a few market movements and out
of a few stocks,» he told CNBC.
You could also make the
argument that, at some
point, there is a significant increase in the per barrel cost
of transportation and that the cancellation
of Keystone XL would shift more barrels onto that more expensive, marginal means.
The
argument a tech company lawyer might offer, namely that consent has been given through a pop - up form filled with paragraph after paragraph
of 6 -
point - size legalese is, frankly, bullshit.
The
point being if you have other sources
of support you don't «need» to rely on SS so much, or at least I suspect that will be the
argument put forward.
The cost
of being a fiduciary will be passed on to investors: This
argument might have been true at one
point..
In the last two years as the bull
argument has been pummeled into reality by the surge in debt, the persistent failure
of consumption growth to close the gap with GDP growth, and the sharp slowdown in overall growth, the mood abroad has turned increasingly bearish, to the
point that many people are speaking about a China collapse and the horrible implications this will have for the rest
of the world.
The government counters this
argument by
pointing out that businesses with an annual income
of $ 150,000 CAD would be impacted the most.
In support
of this second
point, the President has
pointed to overall declines in total Post Office revenue (an
argument analysts are quick to counter — revenue in the Post Office's shipping and packages segment continues to grow).
The
argument is that individuals could opt out
of Ripple at some
point when they do not want anything to do with financial institutions and banks and instead turn towards one on one dealings without the need for intermediaries.
«Part
of our Sector Weight thesis longer term has been the view that at some
point, investors might start to care that a significant portion...
of the company's gross profit pool was no longer growing, and so while investors largely care about Model 3 for the moment, that S / X continue to
point toward these trends makes multiple expansion
arguments more challenging,» analysts Elliot Arnson and Brad Erickson said in a Wednesday note.
As my colleague Dylan Matthews
points out, it's a bit
of a strange
argument, because even if a new NAFTA boosted US economic growth, funds for the wall would still come from US taxpayers.
The main
argument for evergreen funding for new ventures are the cautionary tales
of startups that grew too fast and quickly outpaced their business model to the
point that a profitable business on one scale becomes a ruined venture on the larger scale.
Khan's
arguments make the
point that the public interest is missing from traditional consideration
of antitrust.
The problem, for Aristophanes, is that there's no
argument against incest from the
point of view
of pure reason that works on the individual level.
While the book has weak
points — most notably regarding Isaac Backus, the 18th - century baptist minister and author
of the important treatise Government and Liberty Described and Ecclesiastical Tyranny Exposed (1778)-- who appears and then disappears without much clarity on how he fits the
argument — it is generally an incisive interpretation.
I'll give the main
points of her
argument:
------- Trey, I am very aware
of you
arguments, and capable
of counter
points.
but in attempting to make that large number seem problematic, you actually both defeated your other
argument (about its irrelevance and lack
of pervasiveness) while also unintentionally
pointing out the very opposite
of the
point you were attempting to make — the primary unity underlying a vast & varied swath
of people.
Ginger A., All 3
of your
points are irrelevant to the
argument.
I became one
of those aggressive seven
point Calvinists that argued for
argument's sake.
When some asshat like you, just sayin, HeavenSent, Bob, etc. make blanket statements and refuse to respond to corrections, criticisms, or valid
points refuting those statements, then there is no
point in bringing up any kind
of argument.
That is because the
argument I'm making at his
point in time is not for Christianity, but rather for the existence
of the supernatural and the existence
of God.
She does not address or refute the underlying
arguments of her opposition at any
point in this whole article!
I also don't think I need to
point out to you that using only part
of a definition fundamentally changes the word and definition itself, so to take only parts out to prove what atheism does do as «religious» is flawed and destroys your
argument.
During the pontificates
of John Paul II and Benedict XVI, we non-Catholics arguing moral theology could
point to learned and compelling
arguments coming out
of Rome and say, in effect, «The oldest and largest part
of the Body
of Christ agrees with us, and it does so with remarkable sophistication.»
Over the years, Derr has demonstrated an almost heroic patience in attending to the literature
of radical environmentalism, and responding to
arguments point by
point.
Lincoln exploded this as preposterous, demonstrating their behavior's incompatibility with the Constitution,
pointing out that if they really wanted to claim revolutionary grounds for action, they should have the courage to make that
argument instead, and resting his own
argument on the principles
of the Declaration.
I would like to
point out that those from both sides
of the
argument on belief have one similarity... the lack
of tolerance.
Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these
arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific evidence that
points very clearly to the validity and truth
of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.
You're
points are invalid; Gar marriage is not won, it's a waste
of time in our political system but it's not a battle or
argument that has been won or lost.
You raise a very good
point that escapes most theists and that is while they argue against atheists for not believing in their god, they forget that most
of those
arguments could be applied to them by somebody
of another religion.
Your
argument is the same as
pointing out any one person didn't believe in Christ as the son
of God.
«Perhaps the most powerful
of the pro-choice
arguments,» Ms. Crandall
points out, was that illegality
of abortion would leave America in «the dark ages when thousands
of women died because
of unsafe, back - alley abortions — between five thousand and ten thousand a year was the figure usually given» in the 1970s.
for lack
of good talking
points, you concoct 2 straw men
arguments.
What is the
point of your
argument?
A computer no more remembers the files stored in it than the paper and print
of this book remember my
argument to this
point.»