Sentences with phrase «of arguments i had»

Even the best business partners have disagreements (you should hear some of the arguments I've had with mine).

However, each of these arguments has a weakness.

And most of your argument would be in favor of deism, but it starts to fall apart if you apply Abrahamic god.

The equality half of this argument has two serious defects.

Perhaps if atheists change the verbiage, it wouldn't be offensive to Christians and many of these arguments wouldn't start.

Every single one of those arguments have been throughly dismantled.

If two millennia of argument have not finished off Gnosticism, that most protean of heresies, it seems unlikely that contemporary arguments, no matter how persuasive orthodox believers may find them, will do the job with the unconverted, the skeptical, or the hostile.

And finally... you've addressed 1 % of the argument I've presented... and 0.001 % of the overall argument that there is to present.

Ironically enough you followed that declaration with some silly mumbo jumbo about what type of argument you would be willing to take into consideration.

Once he runs out of argument he has to make personal attacks.

But in the eyes of many middle - of - the - roaders, both sets of arguments have lost plausibility by virtue of being too much disputed.

The greatest of arguments have come about with the disagreements over how it should be approached.

Which of my arguments have been disproven.

In the years ahead, much will hang on which side of that argument has a greater portion of the truth.

The conclusion of the argument would be that the self can not survive apart from its structured society; hence the immortality of the self must include the immortality of that structured society.

I think everyone on either side of the argument would admit that there are people who are simply unwilling to pull their own weight.

To attempt a positivistic attack on the views of my friends using the Aristotelian laws of argument would destroy those relationships.

Simply laying out these sorts of arguments has the effect of making their facile nature plain.

But there is a stronger reason for rejecting the argument — one that has to do with the way in which supporter of that argument would have us treat persons.

One final charge by Hasker is that the kind of argument I have made reveals me to be a «disappointed Calvinist.»

And, as Hartshorne has pointed out, many of the «refutations» of the argument have been based on faulty apprehensions of its meaning or upon dogmatic assumptions such as the thesis that no existence can be derived from mere ideas or that existence is not a predicate.

On one side of the argument we have public health associations, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and consumer groups looking for effective solutions to address the growth of lifestyle diseases, including obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

What utter drivel you two talk, the crux of your argument has always been that we don't need to improve the squad, well if that's true why did we not win the PL last season or the CL?

She sent a voice file attached to an email telling me that she was leaving me because of an argument we had in October 2013.

For several decades, critical educators, mostly in philosophy of education, have been questioning the concept of celebrity role model and all that it implies, but none of their arguments have diminished the popularity of the idea.

I have lost count of the number of arguments I had with my own mother about why it was so important for me to take breastfeeding into my daughter's second year.

As a result most of the arguments have been about their right to protest there and not their criticisms of capitalism.

Both sides of the argument have heralded the referendum as a «unique event».

«One of the arguments I've heard from people is: «Why don't you criticise Assad?»

It seems for every constitutional question at least one side uses a framers» intent argument, with a few more more words in the constitution each of those arguments would be silly or unnecessary.

As Larry Summers has pointed out, and to those of us on the Keynesian side of the argument have suggested all along, there is just no defence for ploughing on with the present policies except Tory dogma.

On the other side of the argument has been business organizations who are pushing to keep the cap as it is.

«The Leave campaign is going heavily on migration because most of the arguments they've been putting forward have been shot down by anybody with any knowledge or experience,» he says, adding that the recent rhetoric on migration bears «a very loose relationship with the truth».

This kind of argument has never been present in Andrew Cuomo's remarks.

But as the research in Yaniv's lab progressed, it became clear that scientists on both sides of the argument had been right: Lymphatic cells do indeed grow from veins, but they originate from a niche within the vein that harbors angioblasts.

Wilson is so good that his assessment of the arguments would have been extremely valuable.

This is why he says that his book, written for a lay audience, inevitably contains «only a shadow of the argument I would like to make».

In between, they continue to refine their alternative theory to the Big Bang, but in recent years the emphasis of their argument has shifted.

This reminds me of the argument I had with a nutritionist friend last night.

A particularly ambitious version of this argument would be to suggest that one of the core functions of opposition is to become better able to lift heavy objects.

(3) Yet it needs to be mentioned, as variations on this kind of argument have shaped views of both Spielberg's place in film history, and his artistic merit, from early in his career.

However, the reason these kinds of questions are tricky is because the questioner, from his / her point of view tells me the critical information (critical from his or her point of view)-- and the folks on the other side of the argument would have provided me with other information that they think matters.

Some of these arguments have merit in certain contexts, but none of them stand alone.

By the end of the novel, which side of the argument has «won» — Nature or Nurture?

One of the arguments I've seen against allowing this is that those resellers aren't paying royalties on the sales.

Basic lines of argument have not changed, although the rhetoric now has gone from a frenzied accusation fest to kind of exhausted yammer.

All of those arguments have some degree of merit.

I'm sure you're on the edge of your seat wondering which side of this argument he'd be on.

So let's say for the sake of argument you have a $ 1,500 a year auto insurance policy.

a dumbed down version of this argument would be like saying «counting to 1002 is harder than counting to 1000 because of the extra 2».