Sentences with phrase «of assets priced»

In other words it manufactures inflation of assets priced in dollars.

In particular, are there macro prudential tools that the Federal Reserve and other regulators can use to limit leverage and speculation and thus prevent the type of asset price booms and busts that have proved so troublesome?

A bubble is an economic cycle characterized by the rapid escalation of asset prices followed by a contraction.

Some observers have suggested that what we need is better models of asset price bubbles (Allen and Carletti 2013).

Thus, the long - running debate on the role of asset prices has come to the fore again.

An increase in selling volume results in a decline of the asset price.

For inflation targeting countries, it would certainly be a retrograde step in my view to be perceived as walking away from a framework which has for a decade delivered good results, in favour of some explicit pursuit of asset prices per se.

The longer the Fed leaves its target rate at zero, the greater the chance of asset price bubbles — and eventual crashes.

An increase in buying volume results in an increase of the assets price.

The test should be the size and circumstances of the asset price moves and their impact on the forecast relative to the central banks» objectives, not the direction of the asset price move.

Unlike normal charts, this seasonal chart illustrates the average performance of an asset price in the course of a year.

Still, the volatility of asset prices, to some extent, is taking a bit more of a back seat now to the real economic story, where growth continues to look stable and steady.

Now, a growing number of institutional investors are watching cryptocurrencies as the frontier of risk - taking to evaluate the sustainability of asset prices.»

These risks are playing out against a backdrop of asset prices propped up by years of plentiful liquidity.

Japan's infamous «Lost Decade» was supposed to refer to the stagnant economic period from 1991 until 2000, after the collapse of the asset price bubble in Japanese housing and stocks.

It is a strategy that seeks to predict the movement of asset prices regardless of what is happening in the wider market.

Why, then, exert emotional energy of fluctuations of asset prices?

Monetary policy has been a key driver of asset prices — but its effectiveness looks to be waning.

If this would've happened if they were a significant and fast fall in asset values of asset pricing, could there be a reverse in course by central banks from tightening back to quantitative easing?

In this new age of fiat money, credit growth drives economic growth, liquidity determines the direction of asset prices and the government controls both through aggressive policy intervention.

Two decades of asset price inflation enabled speculators, homeowners and commercial investors to borrow the interest falling due and still make a capital gain.

Saving parts of the economy from the popping of each asset price bubble can leave, and make, the entire economy more prone to larger and potentially more - damaging price bubbles - such as the housing price bubble.

Nor have we yet deployed a comprehensive set of policies to support the rebalancing of the U.S. economy toward a growth path based more on business investment, trade and broad - based income gains than the type of asset price gains and credit - fuelled consumption, which dominated the last business cycle.

He is currently the Sterling Professor of Economics at Yale University and is a Nobel Laureate as well, having been awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his work on data - based analysis of asset prices and valuations.

Views the fall of asset prices as evidence of tight monetary policy.

Rapid money supply growth with no consumer price inflation can only really occur within the confines of an asset price bubble, or else, where does the money go?

This past Sunday (December 8th), Eugene Fama (along with Robert Shiller and Lars Peter Hansen) delivered his Nobel Prize lecture titled «Two Pillars of Asset Pricing.»

Fama was referring to the joint hypothesis problem in which any statistical test of market efficiency is simultaneously a test of the asset pricing model that is used to measure efficiency and vice versa, meaning that neither market efficiency nor a given asset pricing model can be definitively established (or rejected) via statistical testing.

We assume that the drift in the returns of asset prices consists of an idiosyncratic component and a common component given by a co-integration factor.

Therefore, the higher the binary option price, the greater the perceived probability of the asset price rising above the strike.

Debt Bubbles A (debt) bubble is an economic cycle characterized by rapid escalation of asset prices followed by a contraction.

Greenspan was unwilling to consider the effect of asset prices on monetary policy in any major way until the end of his term.

In financial services, too much time and energy is spent trying to predict the future movements of asset prices.

The excessive risky lending of these institutions created inflation - not of goods but of asset prices.

They are high risk speculative investments which are really just bets or gambles on the movement of asset prices.

Lost in the bull market euphoria is the reality that economists have been dead wrong about the direction of asset prices, particularly bond prices.

For those who are not familiar with Shiller, he is a Nobel Prize winner in economics who won the award in 2013 for his work on the «empirical analysis of asset prices.»

I very much doubt that in September 2008, had financial assets been funded predominately by equity instead of debt, that the deflation of asset prices would have fostered a default contagion much beyond that of the dotcom boom.

To explain why rising private market valuations might be justified, we needed to explore why the market today may be different than ever before (there are a number of good articles testing out the rationality of public market valuations in technology these days — this analysis is much more directly focused on teasing out the rationality of asset prices for those companies that aren't valued and revalued on a daily basis).

Not only does Muraki observe that the «correlation between Bitcoin and VIX has increased dramatically» in 2018, but he goes on to note «a growing number of institutional investors are watching cryptocurrencies as the frontier of risk - taking to evaluate the sustainability of asset prices».

But, what if the rise in bitcoin prices after the fork isn't a simple case of an asset price rising because risk has been reduced?

Not exact matches

- Taxes on depreciation and amortization related to the revaluation of assets as part of the allocation of the purchase price of businesses

* In the consolidated income statement, «Depreciation and amortization related to the revaluation of tangible and intangible assets as part of the purchase price allocation process» is now recognized in «Operating expenses».

The minutes of the Fed's June meeting noted that «some participants suggested that increased risk tolerance among investors might be contributing to elevated asset prices more broadly; a few participants expressed concern that subdued market volatility, coupled with a low equity premium, could lead to a build - up of risks to financial stability.»

Depreciation and amortization related to the revaluation of tangible and intangible assets as part of the allocation of the purchase price of businesses

Before the financial crisis, most every economy was doing well, albeit on a bubble of debt and inflated asset prices.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

The firstquarter 2018 figure included $ 4 million in net other expenses, mainly corresponding to restructuring expenses and $ 8 million in depreciation and amortization related to the revaluation of assets carried out as part of the Bostik and Den Braven purchase price allocation processes.

- Depreciation and amortization related to the revaluation of tangible and intangible assets as part of the allocation of the purchase price of businesses

Of which: Depreciation and amortization related to the revaluation of assets as part of the allocation of the purchase price of businessOf which: Depreciation and amortization related to the revaluation of assets as part of the allocation of the purchase price of businessof assets as part of the allocation of the purchase price of businessof the allocation of the purchase price of businessof the purchase price of businessof businesses