Sentences with phrase «of atheism as»

[10] State promotion of atheism as a public norm was first practised during a brief period in Revolutionary France.

Perhaps one day a Church will arise that will fight against this indoctrination of our children and establishment of Atheism as the national faith.

Yes David religion of atheism as some have used the legal definition of religion in law suits in favour of an atheist position.

After years of some respectful discussion and some not so respectful discussion she's come to what she also calls the inescapable conclusion of atheism as well.

[3] State promotion of atheism as a public norm was first practiced during a brief period in Revolutionary France.

and now — for the THIRD time — I point out to you that I gave multiple categories for atheistic belief (which I NEVER claimed were exhaustive, but you are rightly deducing that I am pressing out many other forms of atheism as illogical or a form of cognitive dissonance).

When something can be created out of nothing I will accept the religion of Atheism as being true.

I like that, and I would include sneering at the «religion» of atheism as being juvenile and stunted too.

So, I suspect the atheists you encounter are not representative of atheism as a whole.

With this being my personal perspective, I have a problem with thinking of atheism as the default position.

Not exact matches

«In the day - to day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such thing as atheism.

@Yakobi try again,... how about 1/3 fallen angels (now called demons) making up religions / as well as belief of atheism to be worshiped directly / indirectly as God?

Can't be too intelligent, as you seem to misunderstand that atheism, like any form of theism, is strictly a belief, and what a person believes has ZERO BEARING on how intelligent they can BECOME.

No, what poisons everything is atheism / secular humanism as evidenced by the fact that 93 % of all of humanity's wars were started for non-religious purposes.

A central work in the canon of popular atheism, it was a masterclass in polemical writing, cementing his self - description as an «anti-theist».

Dawkins argues that while there appear to be plenty of individuals that would place themselves as «1» due to the strictness of religious doctrine against doubt, most atheists do not consider themselves «7» because atheism arises from a lack of evidence and evidence can always change a thinking person's mind.

this is ultra-hilarious coming from someone who posts as: Greatest Flaw of Atheism - they have no evidence backing up their claims

Many believe that atheism should be defined as a belief that no gods exist because they want to make it seem like a position of faith.

Dawkins, who is widely regarded as the most respected figure in atheism, is lending his voice to this event because he says freedom for atheists is «constantly under threat from people who would like to turn this country into some sort of a theocracy.»

As Pastor Wurmbramd said, Atheism doesn't give peace in the heart of atheists.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

I know a lot of anti-Christian atheists who are unreasonable and irrational and treat atheism as though it were a religion.

One might characterize New Atheism as a largely polemical movement that attacks a particular type of Christianity — the religious and political practices of the «far right» — and conflates the part with the whole of Christendom.

@nothing... Atheism, as far as I'm concerned, is just the absence of a religious belief.

Since it apparently needs clarification, my intent was not to include atheism as a religious group, but to speak to the vast number of atheists that treat it as such.

That said, Atheism has become a new religion in it's own right, stating with as much certainty as people of «faith», THERE IS NO GOD.

It is not exactly «atheism» that is the default position so much as that there is no need to appeal to divine agency in a scientific account of nature.

When they combine that awareness with atheism, they become existentialists or governed by the thought that there's no escape but death from the miserable absurdity of who we are as ephemeral specks caught between two abysses.

YOU are afraid of atheism, as you are likely one yourself, and can't admit it.

He is eager to declare the Bible inaccurate, and that is equivalent to saying God is a liar, and saying that God can not be trusted, and saying that man has better answers, which is the same as deniers do, except for the ones who are afraid to admit their hate of God, and instead try to hide their hate behind ignorance and the atheism label.

As a concert promoter my circle of friends is in the thousands and its really not uncommon... Everyones looking for answers and atheism does nt offer anything but negatives or denials.

Viewing religion as how one deals with the meaning of life means atheism and agnosticism can be viewed as a religion.

I also don't think I need to point out to you that using only part of a definition fundamentally changes the word and definition itself, so to take only parts out to prove what atheism does do as «religious» is flawed and destroys your argument.

one of the definitions of religion: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith» As noted above Atheism is none of these things.

This doesn't go into the realm of atheism vs. theism as much as it does go into the realm of science vs. nonsense.

If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».

As more and more children get removed from the old ways of indoctrinating them all with religious belief from an early age, then atheism will become the norm, and religion the refuge of the minorities of the mentally ill and the lame seekers of cargo cults.

Just like any religion there are different types of atheists, some simply don't believe in a «creator» or higher authority, but others use atheism as a shield of intellectuality, safely keeping them from feeling anything.

It is what has lead me to my veiw that Atheism as a religion, the passion most Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and start forcing their view on others, I see that as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

See Hitler and jewish extermiation as an example of what happens when atheism reigns supreme and religion is totally eradicated from society.

Atheism, self center ism is way of animals and hindrance negativity to truth absolute GOD, foundation of consti tution of USA and universe and source for existence of everything in existence, otherwise known as constant.

As the burden of proof is on the claimant, then the natural state is atheism.

First I want to say that I'm not saying Atheist is a religion in a bad sence or to try and produce some sort of shame only that it falls under the definition of a religion and wondering how it would change your feelings \ view of Atheism even if everybody considered it a religous view, if it's something you believe to be true (that there is no god) what does it matter if someone labels it as your world view?

Atheism is as much of a faith as bald is a hair color.

In view of its inability to evade assuming self - existence somewhere, «even that which is commonly regarded as the negation of all religion — even positive Atheism comes within the definition» of religion

I wouldn't want to quote him as indicative of atheism.

UFOs, aliens, fairies, and such are NOT part of atheism, although these are often cited by xians as manifestations of the devil.

But understand that atheism qualifies as a belief also — a belief of «non-belief» if you will.

Instead of actually trying to justify your failed attempt at trying to label Atheism as a religion it is better to ignore it and focus on being a troll instead.