Sentences with phrase «of atheism for»

Several of the governments mentioned in the comments, like North Korea and China, do not wave a banner of atheism for the populace to rally around — they are cults of personality (Kim Jong Il and Mao Tse Tung, respectively).

This was the ground of atheism for me.

They did not wave a flag of atheism for the populace to rally around.

The thought of atheism for many would make them lean towards thinking that they would be more likely to lean towards conception not being the start of life.

Not exact matches

Reddit is known for many things, including, but certainly not limited to, its uncanny ability to spark viral content, the passion of its commenters, and the thousands of subreddits ranging on topics from health and fitness to atheism.

No, what poisons everything is atheism / secular humanism as evidenced by the fact that 93 % of all of humanity's wars were started for non-religious purposes.

Things are askew, there are reasons people leave the church, and there are reasons for atheism, for distrust of «christians».

The loudest factions of Christianity and atheism aren't the largest, which presents the occasion for mutual understanding: open, honest, introspective and rational discussion between groups of people who share more in common than not.

It apparently is very difficult for those people to even grasp the concept of Atheism.

The name is stolen but the message of Truth Atheism is not healthy for children and other living things is being proclaimed even by atheists themselves.

It does not bother me that you might not believe, but it seems strange to me when someone throws insults at me for my having faith in God when your atheism is just you having faith that there is no god of any kind.

Dawkins, who is widely regarded as the most respected figure in atheism, is lending his voice to this event because he says freedom for atheists is «constantly under threat from people who would like to turn this country into some sort of a theocracy.»

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Such accounts of the previous generation's struggle to defend and advance authentic religious faith against the scientism, atheism, materialism, hedonism, and despair of the surrounding culture can do much to prepare and strengthen us for our struggles against similar forces in our time.

Atheism has no logical answer for this or for the creation of life, but desparately scratches for one.

If you require atheists to explain something physics directly tells you we can't talk about right now, your burden of proof for atheism is oddly far more extreme than your burden of proof for «god».

He is eager to declare the Bible inaccurate, and that is equivalent to saying God is a liar, and saying that God can not be trusted, and saying that man has better answers, which is the same as deniers do, except for the ones who are afraid to admit their hate of God, and instead try to hide their hate behind ignorance and the atheism label.

As a concert promoter my circle of friends is in the thousands and its really not uncommon... Everyones looking for answers and atheism does nt offer anything but negatives or denials.

Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, and Hitchens (Speaking of which, our prayers goes out to Christopher Hitchens in hopes of a speedy recovery for his cancer, we need more time with him Lord) are NOT out to ask that atheism be given respect.

@edgelbraith — i assume you are talking about your religion of atheism and I have to agree that some of you are very childish (in addition to being hateful, petty & devoid of compassion for others) but I don't think it's fair to lump all of you in a group like that.

It is what has lead me to my veiw that Atheism as a religion, the passion most Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and start forcing their view on others, I see that as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?

Atheism, self center ism is way of animals and hindrance negativity to truth absolute GOD, foundation of consti tution of USA and universe and source for existence of everything in existence, otherwise known as constant.

I admit to a certain amount of hypocrisy where I sometimes favor a more loose definition for some things (like atheism) and a more narrow definition for other things (like religion).

I was raised a Muslim, then went thru a period of atheism due my utter dislike for religion and then became a Catholic due to my personal experiences and my Dad's side of the family who are Catholics.

It's not legal to fire someone for being a member of a religion but atheism is not a protected religion according to the supreme court.

Atheism makes claim that in our darkest hours we are the ones with the ability to move forward, that we can make those paths and not wait for a deity to come upon us and clear the land of its evils.

If they are being jerks, it's not because of atheism, so I am not going to answer for them.

people really need to study the bible — not for Christianity sake but for theirs - the athiest would like everyone to understand them and used this phrase — But when I explain that atheism is central to my worldview — that I am in awe of the natural world and that I believe it is up to human beings, instead of a divine force, to strive to address our problems — they often better understand my views, even if we don't agree.

You can't kill millions in the name of atheism though because atheism doesn't stand for anything, it is nothing more than the lack of theism.

In fact one of my strongest arguments for atheism is that I can find no evidence of god.

atheism is for people who don't have a need for having the mysteries of life be explained by whatever religion is the fashion of the day.

THerefore to believe in atheism, is to believe in nothing, with not hope and no possibility for the sustainability of the African peoples.

Well, Christians would have melted her flesh on a stake for converting to Atheism if we still lived in the era of Church rule.

For many, Atheism IS a belief, and they are guilty of preaching it to others.

Mormons and Mormonism provides a beautiful argument for atheism, in giving a great example showing the nature of religious belief: Based on unreal fabrications, sprinkled with bizarre claims.

«It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity.»

Justin, as much as this would be a completely black & white, rational decision for you on the subject, the majority of humanity floats in a gray area on this, drifting back and forth between atheism and strong spiritual beliefs (usually rooted in the culture they were raised in).

I prophecy that sometime in the next 3 pages of comments on this blog, someone going by the handle «Atheism is Not Healthy for Children and Other Living Things» will post a message that comprises, in its entirety, the words «Prayer changes things.»

Dalahäst You have claimed that Christianity «works» for you more than your former atheism, so I thought I detected a judgment of it's superiority there.

have you been in prison for the crime of atheism?

He persecuted those in the hierarchy of several churches, but his actual agenda was for communism, to which «atheism» is very nearly required for complete «equality».

Atheism is for people that want to be right about everything and can't admit there might be more to life than their limited perception of the world.

Since atheism per se takes no stand on the killing of innocent people, when an sociopathic atheist is responsible for the deaths of people, be it one person or a million, it does not represent any kind of inconsistency with his status as an atheist.

Atheism, for me, is the logical conclusion of rational evaluation of the available evidence.

We don't say there are six types of Theists, we focus on the Religions, and that is what is missing — a modern Religion / Belief system for Atheists — as Atheism does not mean without rules, just about whether God exists or not.

The novels and other writings of this Portuguese writer have for years been noted for their strident atheism and attacks on the Catholic Church.

I post about atheism, not to change the minds of Christians, but to voice alternatives to religion, for the «undecided voters» who may be reading these comments.

atheism tells us to do good for the sake of doing good - not because of the reward of heaven or the threat of hell.

You must have either read my mind, or my post (a few lines down) wherein I responded to «Atheism's» «Prayer changes things» by saying: «Yep, I'm sure those 9 -1-1 terrorists (if you believe they were terrorists, and not government operatives... but that's another post for another blog...) were doing a lot of praying... and, boy, did they change things!»

There is a plethora of evidentiary support for atheism.