Sentences with phrase «of atheism in»

I would throw away the useless god of atheism in a heartbeat for this priceless treasure!!

The climax of this development was reached in the establishment of the Soviet regime in Russia, which has now become the most powerful political exponent of atheism in the world.

He said he was and he promoted his communist style of atheism in order to hold on to power.

Go ahead and be uncomfortable; in 20 years, people are going to perceive your intolerance of atheism in the same light that discrimination against black is today.

can you not see that there are different strands of atheism in nihilism & naturalism?

In the face of these facts, there can be little doubt that Christianity itself has been one of the major causes of atheism in the modern world.

I was told, again and again, that there was now a movement of atheism in Egypt.

I think all you have to do is to reduce the amount of atheism in your system.

«The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today is Christians: who acknowledge Jesus with their lips, walk out the door, and deny Him by their lifestyle.

EvolvedDNA, Yes Atheists do have a terrible record of killing in the name of Atheism in the 20th Century.

The only distinction is that atheists are not so diverse in their premises of atheism in itself; there are really only two flavors.

Historian Paul Johnson commented on the advance of atheism in modern history:» Nietzsche wrote in 1886:» The greatest event of recent times — that God is dead, that the belief in the Christian God is no longer tenable — is beginning to cast its first shadows over Europe.»

Not exact matches

«In the day - to day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such thing as atheism.

In doing so, Hitchens summed up the mantras of the new atheism: that «faith is a fairy tale», that it is possible to be «good without God» and that religion is not just false, but evil.

A central work in the canon of popular atheism, it was a masterclass in polemical writing, cementing his self - description as an «anti-theist».

A million times more people have been kiIIed by religious zealots in the name of their relgion than an atheist in the name of atheism.

If the idea that our beliefs are determined by our upbringing or geographical location then why the rise in atheism in America, a so - called Christian nation (according to the rest of the world and confirmed in polls... yet quickly denied by the U.S. media when addressed this way), taking off?

The Logical conclusion of Atheism is a comparably short life ending in a nothing death.

Atheism: Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

I have always felt that science is at the core of Atheism, and used that core principal in judging the merits of a position

The loudest factions of Christianity and atheism aren't the largest, which presents the occasion for mutual understanding: open, honest, introspective and rational discussion between groups of people who share more in common than not.

Signs about God fly directly in the face of atheism.

But you do continue to prove my point, that the only reason your religion of Atheism exist is to because my religious belief in God.

I pray that followers of Christ would face the reality of the growing atheism in this country.

So a Christian wakes up one morning, in his 19th year of Christianity, and comes up with a bright idea... i want to TRY out atheism, and this is considered normal!

«There is in this country at the moment a great revival of atheism, and the number of atheists in the country is much larger than people realize.»

It does not bother me that you might not believe, but it seems strange to me when someone throws insults at me for my having faith in God when your atheism is just you having faith that there is no god of any kind.

Dawkins, who is widely regarded as the most respected figure in atheism, is lending his voice to this event because he says freedom for atheists is «constantly under threat from people who would like to turn this country into some sort of a theocracy.»

Stalin did nothing in the name of atheism.

As Pastor Wurmbramd said, Atheism doesn't give peace in the heart of atheists.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Atheism, in it's least severe definition, denotes the lack of the belief «theism» (or, in simpler terms, the lack of a belief in God or Gods).

Such accounts of the previous generation's struggle to defend and advance authentic religious faith against the scientism, atheism, materialism, hedonism, and despair of the surrounding culture can do much to prepare and strengthen us for our struggles against similar forces in our time.

Both atheism and theism become caught in an endless circular loop of reasoning that goes nowhere.

Atheism only defines my lack of belief in gods, I will stand up against people pushing their religion in my face or the public square, instead of keeping it in their homes and churches - the only two places it belongs.

Even during this experiment with atheism, won't there still be a nagging suspicion in the back of Bell's mind that God exists?]

Atheism isn't a system of ethics, it is just a lack of belief in gods.

He also attributes his atheism to his scientific training: «My study of science, trying to find a non-theistic answer to the questions of how the universe is and our place in it, did probably push me away from religious faith.»

That said, Atheism has become a new religion in it's own right, stating with as much certainty as people of «faith», THERE IS NO GOD.

In these constant religion versus atheism debates, that has got to be one of the funniest statements I have ever read.

Theists are so pathetic, since they can't compete against the logic and reason of atheism, they try to drag in down to the level of religion

Atheism makes no distinction on which god or gods do not exist, it is the lack of belief in any of them.

This isn't about that though, this is more a lesson in how both religion and atheism together can be equally guilty of scamming people out of donations and book sales over trivial and distorted teachings.

He compared it to a form of atheism — pro tem atheism, wherein one believes God's existence is real in the beginning and even the end, but suggests that He is absent in - between.

Atheism is a lack of belief in any gods, not a belief there are none.

It is not exactly «atheism» that is the default position so much as that there is no need to appeal to divine agency in a scientific account of nature.

Agnosticism is just a step in the direction of Atheism, it does not have the high ground since it gives equal credibility to belief and no belief in religion... they are not equal.

Stalin killed far more people in the name of atheism than anyone everyone else combined who killed in the name of a religion during the 20th century.

And all those who believe in separation of church and state... Atheism is a belief and therefore, should not be taught, recognized or given a special preference over other beliefs.

@Chad «sorry to burst your bubble of pure speculation, however I grew up in an atheist family, I was taught atheism.