Sentences with phrase «of atmospheric gas»

Starting right about 12 μ both graphs deteriorate into what looks like a much colder thermalization induced BB radiator for the whole of the atmospheric gas milieux.
The atmosphere is a great absorber at those discrete frequencies corresponding to an energy transition of an atmospheric gas.
So something less than 1 m / s in velocity of atmospheric gas molecules may be occurring in tropical ocean area [and a lot of the earth's atmosphere is over the the tropical oceans].
And / or the average velocity of atmospheric gas could less than 300 m / s.
The reason for scientific concern over global warming rests on basic physics — infrared absorption — and robust measurements of atmospheric gas concentrations.
So, depending on which GCM you subscribe to, and depending on the extent to which you elevate arthropogenic modification of the atmospheric gas mixture as a causitive factor of specific long term dynamics, yes, La Nina may be a proxy, of sorts, of the AGW theory assuming it is true.
The team then used these data to calculate the difference between the speed of the atmospheric gas at different positions on the star and the average speed over the entire star.
This resulted in a map of the relative speed of the atmospheric gas across the entire disc of Antares — the first ever created for a star other than the Sun..
The goal of the mission is to determine the role that loss of atmospheric gas to space played in changing the Martian climate through time.
Trapped in these ice cores are bubbles of atmospheric gas.
We know that contained in these ice layers there are bubbles of atmospheric gases, particulate matter and other distince indicators of the climate at the time the layers were formed.
Remote sensing of atmospheric gases — from a satellite, for instance — can be performed with conventional instruments called spectrometers, but while satellite instruments have global coverage, they sample specific regions on Earth infrequently.
FACT: Oxygen makes up almost 21 percent of atmospheric gases.
However, this event could not reveal the identity of the atmospheric gases.
Online reader Robert Knox wondered how long it took for the solar wind to strip Mars of its atmospheric gases.
More research is needed to see if this novel use of atmospheric gases as an alternative energy source is more widespread in Antarctica and elsewhere, the scientists say.
Instead, it could be that the only thing they require is the right combination of atmospheric gases.
«This new understanding about how life can still exist in physically extreme and nutrient - starved environments like Antarctica opens up the possibility of atmospheric gases supporting life on other planets,» adds Ferrari.
They studied the planet when it crossed in front of its host star to observe the star's light as it was filtered through the planet's atmosphere, which provided clues on its mix of atmospheric gases.
If so, please explain what is wrong with our knowledge of quantum mechanics and the properties of atmospheric gases.
Re # 8, any changes in climate over glacial - interglacial timescales have to take into account an additional component: the biogeochemical cycling of atmospheric gases.
Briefly put, the process can be defined as a CO2 molecule absorbing a ~ 650 cm - 1 photon (equivalent to a thermal energy of about 900 K), and losing that energy to the surrounding bath of atmospheric gases.
For example: could different oceanic circulation rates change the oceanic CO2 sink / source behaviour, or could different atmospheric conditions change the mixing rates of atmospheric gases hence modify their affect on the solar forcing?
New Study Finds Most Of Earth's Oxygen Used For Complaining SEATTLE — Following a multiyear study of atmospheric gases and their role in organic processes on earth, a team of researchers at the University of Washington reported this week that the majority of the oxygen on the planet is used for complaining.
The majority (99.9 %) of atmospheric gases nitrogen, oxygen and argon do not absorb IR.
I think you are getting confused from a statement about there being less CO2 in total (because the air is «thinner»... i.e., there is less of all atmospheric gases there... due to a combination of elevation and the fact that the air thins out more as you go up in elevation near the poles than elsewhere).
WE DO NOT KNOW THE LONG TERM EFFECTS THESE HIGH LEVELS OF ATMOSPHERIC GASES WILL HAVE ON OURSELVES, OUR CHILDREN, our livestock & pets.
I would equally interested fo people who believe «global warming» affirming clearly that they don't believe that an excited CO2 molecule increases the kinetic energy of atmospheric gases in any significant degree.
«It is possible that an increase in concentration of atmospheric gases which absorb the outgoing infrared radiation could result in a rise in average global temperature,» William McCollam, Jr., then president of EEI, admitted to Congress in 1989.
Often the CO2 will strike one of the oxygen or nitrogen molecules which make up the great majority of atmospheric gases, setting them in motion, too — warming them.
The separative efficiency of the Earth's gravitational atmosphere is very good at one parametric scale, 100 % efficient at separating helium form the rest of the atmospheric gases; --RRB-
It is true that the greenhouse effect theory is based on experimental observations, e.g., a) the different infra - red properties of the atmospheric gases; b) the infra - red nature of the Earth's outgoing radiation and c) the observation that fossil fuel usage is increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Understanding the interactions of the atmosphere with the land and ocean is key to understanding the natural cycles of atmospheric gases and requires going beyond the earth's surface.
In other words, if the LTE assumption holds, the radiative properties of the atmospheric gases in a given «layer» can increase or decrease the average energy content of that layer relative to the others.
Climatologist David Legates explains why the influence of atmospheric gasses does not necessarily reflect their proportion in the atmosphere.
Twice a year they sink, carrying their load of atmospheric gases downward.
Carbon dioxide production by humans is less than 11 % of the world's production of CO2, which in turn is less than half of the less than 0.1 % of atmospheric gases that are not oxygen or nitrogen.
The radiative theory of atmospheric gases holds that the temperature of Earth's surface is higher than it should be according to the Stefan Boltzmann Constant:
The oceans are the main control of atmospheric CO2 as one of the atmospheric gases in constant flux between the water and the atmosphere.
In addition, they found that in scenarios where the ocean current slows down due to the addition of heat, the ocean absorbs less of both atmospheric gases and heat, though its ability to absorb heat is more greatly reduced.
As I have pointed out before, the difference for most of the atmospheric gases is insignificant but not for CO2, which has a kinetic diameter of 0,33 nm and a collision diameter of 0.39 nm.
26 Recent Findings The IPCC also reported that concentrations of atmospheric gases have continued to increase as a result of human activities.
As the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) slows down, the ocean absorbs less of both atmospheric gases and heat, though its ability to absorb heat is more greatly reduced.
«The Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) experiments measure naturally - occurring microwave thermal emission from the limb (edge) of Earth's atmosphere to remotely sense vertical profiles of atmospheric gases, temperature, pressure, and cloud ice.
... where the effects of atmospheric gases is shown on both incomeing and outgoing radiation.
It is ignored in most assessments of atmospheric gases; they record only dry air at sea level.
-- It seems perfectly reasonable to me that if we imagine the surface never emits that energy in the first place, - energy that is stored in the surface and just below, i.e. oceans, lakes, rivers, ground, and air, — just to mention a few, then any surface temperature change would be completely reliant on variations in Solar irradiation and advection mainly by Water Vapor (WV) but also by other GHGs that have the ability to contain more heat than the rest of the atmospheric gases.
A change in the LW radiative forcing of atmospheric gases will, if applied to the same climate, result in some disequilibrium.
It seems perfectly reasonable to me that if we imagine the surface never emits that energy in the first place, - energy that is stored in the surface and just below, i.e. oceans, lakes, rivers, ground, and air, — just to mention a few, then any surface temperature change would be completely reliant on variations in Solar irradiation and advection mainly by Water Vapor (WV) but also by other GHGs that have the ability to contain more heat than the rest of the atmospheric gases.
Still more important was another study, co-authored with the eminent spectroscopist G.B.B.M. Sutherland, advancing quantitative knowledge of atmospheric gases other than water vapor.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z