Land has a strong control on the vertical distribution
of atmospheric heating.
Due to the huge volume of sea water and the density differentials between air and ocean that would be impossible or would require such huge amounts
of atmospheric heating and such huge lengths of time that for practical purposes it should be ignored.
In terms of magnitude
of atmospheric heating effect, aborbed solar seems to rank a close second behind latent heating, in terms of net heating.
That said, the efficiency
of the atmospheric heat engine is rather low; from time to time, inefficiency causes the disparity between the warm source and the cold sink to increase.
Scientists at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory showed that global climate models are not accurately depicting the true depth and strength of tropical clouds that have a strong hold on the general circulation
of atmospheric heat and the global water balance.
But your papers claim of a «bias» in the surface temperature record * if * it is used as a linear predictor
of atmospheric heat content only makes sense * if * indeed people had used it in that sense.
In 1896 Swedish chemist and Nobel laureate Svante Arrhenius used Langley's bolometer to measure the heat from the Moon at various altitudes above the horizon in order to estimate the dependence
of atmospheric heat trapping on amount of water vapor and CO2 along the line of sight to the Moon, a much longer path near the horizon than at 45 degrees.
14), addresses the mechanisms
of atmospheric heat transfer not only via radiation but also by convection, which is not mentioned once in the IPCC's scientific reports (Ref.
Keystone would boost that total to 2.2 million barrels per day, enrich the pit owners, and lay the groundwork for an ever - more - rapid exploitation of this dangerous pile
of atmospheric heat - venom.
Magnusdottir, G., and R. Saravanan, 1999: The response
of atmospheric heat transport to zonally - averaged SST trends.
This work established the standard radiative - convective model
of atmospheric heat transfer.
Perhaps the negative feedback of cloud cover has kicked in, dampening global warming, or the ocean absorption
of atmospheric heat is playing a new and more decisive role.
These models predicted that the Northern Hemisphere Polar region would warm fastest and first, that the Southern Ocean would draw a greater portion
of atmospheric heat into the ocean system, and that land ice melt near Greenland and West Antarctica would generate cold, fresh water flows into the nearby ocean zones and set off localized cooling.
Are they stating that much
of the atmospheric heat is due to absorption of insolation from the sun and conducted energy from the surface, vs absorption of LWIR from the surface?
While there is some influence of differences in forcing patterns among the scenarios, and of effects of oceanic uptake and heat transport in modifying the patterns over time, there is also support for the role
of atmospheric heat transport in offsetting such influences (e.g., Boer and Yu, 2003b; Watterson and Dix, 2005).
All that is needed is to add heat carried upwards past the denser atmosphere (and most CO2) by convection and the latent heat from water changing state (the majority of heat transport to the tropopause), the albedo effects of clouds, the inability of long wave «downwelling» (the blue balls) to warm water that makes up 2 / 3rds of the Earth's surface, and that due to huge differences in enthalpy dry air takes far less energy to warm than humid air so temperature is not a measure
of atmospheric heat content.
Atmospheric temperature is not a measure
of atmospheric heat content.
Furthermore the concept
of atmospheric heat engine is not ofter used directly in actual science as far as know, it's rather a way used to help understanding one important aspect of the Earth system.
My point was that Willis used the concept
of atmospheric heat engine erroneously.
Not exact matches
Darin Toohey, a professor at the University
of Colorado's
atmospheric and oceanic sciences department and one
of the paper's authors, says black carbon absorbs shortwave radiation from the sun, causing the atmosphere to
heat up.
The first is that our planet's oceans act as a massive watery
heat - sink, and currently absorb more than 90 percent
of increased
atmospheric heat that are associated with human activity.
Sweltering summertime
heat waves are on the rise across the Northern Hemisphere because
of atmospheric changes brought on by Arctic warming, new research shows.
«Clouds are one
of the major feedbacks in cooling and
heating the surface»
of the ice, said Nate Miller, an
atmospheric science graduate student at the University
of Wisconsin, Madison.
This will reveal both the signatures
of atmospheric ingredients such as water, methane, and carbon dioxide, and also how
heat flows from the planet's dayside to its nightside.
On a global scale, the
heating of atmospheric molecules causes the lower atmosphere, or troposphere, to expand and stretch higher during the day; it then settles back down as it cools at night.
The complex interactions
of atmospheric turbulence and
heat transport affect global climate.
James McCarthy, professor
of biological oceanography at Harvard, says this summer's record
heat and dryness could have occurred with lower
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations — but it would have been highly unlikely.
«I knew just from basic physics that there would be a point at which
heat and humidity would become intolerable, and it didn't seem that anyone had looked at that from a climate change perspective,» says Steven Sherwood, an
atmospheric scientist at the University
of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.
To survive 50 millennia and return its payload to Earth intact, KEO must have many layers
of shielding — aluminum to protect against oxidation, tungsten and titanium to protect against meteors and cosmic rays, ceramic to protect against the
heat of atmospheric reentry.
Computer model finds historical patterns In order to learn that this
atmospheric pattern exists in advance
of heat waves, Teng and her co-authors had to look far back in the history
of heat waves — from before weather records were kept.
Of course, the extra
heat trapped by human greenhouse gas emissions is likely to play a bigger role than raindrop friction in any
atmospheric changes.
Yet despite the importance
of these «
atmospheric rivers» for the global water and
heat cycles, the mechanism behind their formation is still a mystery.
That
heated surface air then rose into the
atmospheric boundary layer — the lowest level
of the troposphere — doubling its height to more than 4 kilometers, and creating a thick blanket
of heat.
Instead
of dissipating into space, the infrared radiation that is absorbed by
atmospheric water vapor or carbon dioxide produces
heating, which in turn makes the earths surface warmer.
«But on top
of that, changes in
atmospheric circulation can favor particular weather conditions associated with
heat waves.»
Coumou has examined the waviness
of the jet stream in previous work and has suggested that its large twists and turns, slow - moving undulations called Rossby waves, promote
atmospheric «blocking» — a kind
of stagnation
of weather patterns that he says can exacerbate
heat waves.
Francesco Panerai
of Analytical Mechanical Associates Inc., a materials scientist leading a series
of X-ray experiments at Berkeley Lab for NASA Ames Research Center, discusses a 3 - D visualization (shown on screens)
of a
heat shield material's microscopic structure in simulated spacecraft
atmospheric entry conditions.
Scientists at the Department
of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and NASA are using X-rays to explore, via 3 - D visualizations, how the microscopic structures
of spacecraft
heat shield and parachute materials survive extreme temperatures and pressures, including simulated
atmospheric entry conditions on Mars.
Scientists finally confirmed this hypothesis in the 1960s when it became possible to develop adequate models
of solar
atmospheric heating.
Using 19 climate models, a team
of researchers led by Professor Minghua Zhang
of the School
of Marine and
Atmospheric Sciences at Stony Brook University, discovered persistent dry and warm biases
of simulated climate over the region
of the Southern Great Plain in the central U.S. that was caused by poor modeling
of atmospheric convective systems — the vertical transport
of heat and moisture in the atmosphere.
The continuation
of current trends in shrub and tree expansion could further amplify this
atmospheric heating by two to seven times.
Another principal investigator for the project, Laura Pan, senior scientist at the National Center for
Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., believes storm clusters over this area
of the Pacific are likely to influence climate in new ways, especially as the warm ocean temperatures (which feed the storms and chimney) continue to
heat up and
atmospheric patterns continue to evolve.
Sulphur particles in the stratosphere reflect sunlight and therefore act antagonistically to
atmospheric greenhouse gases like CO2, which capture the
heat of the sun on Earth.
Our understanding
of how certain
atmospheric gases trap
heat dates back almost 200 years to 1824 when Joseph Fourier described what we know as the greenhouse effect.
As long as the Sun warms the surface
of the earth non-uniformly, the
atmospheric heat engine will continue to drive the general circulation.
But it is a complicated picture: the effect that extra
atmospheric CO2 has in these kind
of experimental setups might not reflect its effects in the real world, where other factors — such as elevated
heat, or changes in precipitation — come into play.
The temperature gradient creates
atmospheric circulation, which transports
heat from areas
of equatorial excess to the cold polar regions.
In the North Atlantic, more
heat has been retained at deep levels as a result
of changes to both the ocean and
atmospheric circulations, which have led to the winter atmosphere extracting less
heat from the ocean.
[NASA's OCO - 2 Mission in Pictures (Gallery)-RSB- The concentration
of atmospheric carbon dioxide — a
heat - trapping «greenhouse gas» — has risen from 280 parts per million (ppm) before the Industrial Revolution to about 400 ppm today.
Turning up the
heat seems to increase the rate at which the plants produce methane, Keppler says, which could explain why
atmospheric levels
of methane were high hundreds
of thousands
of years ago when global temperatures were balmy.