Thanks to rolling unrest over government corruption, unemployment and food prices, the
stability of authoritarian regimes (not to mention a few democratic ones) is being tested around the world, but especially in the world's oil - soaked heartland.
As the world looked on in awe at the protests in Egypt that led to the
ouster of the authoritarian regime, a far more profound revolution took place away from television cameras.
Six years after the impressive civil uprising that demanded «the overthrow of the regime,» Egypt under President Abdel Fattah el - Sisi allegedly reflects the complete
return of the authoritarian regime.
I believe you're describing some
sort of authoritarian regime that restricts land ownership based upon square footage or utilization capability?
Post-Tsar Russia, post-colonial Africa, South America - you find numerous examples, where the
overthrowing of authoritarian regime has resulted in a short period of quasi-democracy, quickly replaced by dictatorships.
Their embellishments — such as the
rise of authoritarian regimes more willing than democratic societies to impose drastic measures — give the book a heightened sense of reality.
A tyranny, a society in which only one person holds most of the power and rules with self - interest, requires that people think, feel, and act in ways
supportive of an authoritarian regime.
Psychologising dissent, and refusing to recognise, much less engage with, the substance of people's disagreements — their political objections, their rational criticisms, their desire to do things differently — is the
hallmark of authoritarian regimes.
You go on about how human rights are abused «by atheists,» where you live, but ironically most Western atheists strongly disapprove of the kinds
of authoritarian regimes that do that.