Similarly, Kilianski and Rudman (1998) asked the question «Do women approve
of benevolent sexism?»
The idea
of benevolent sexism is essentially that while trying to appear overly kind or generous, someone actually views the other person as incapable or incompetent because of their gender.
Not exact matches
Two components
of both hostile and
benevolent sexism — dehumanization and traditional gender roles — especially contribute to unhealthy attitudes surrounding rape and rape victims.
[
Benevolent sexism] did relate to rape myth acceptance in cases
of acquaintance rape (Abrams et al., 2003), which accounts for about two thirds
of all rapes committed (U.S. Department
of Justice, 2005; RAINN 2012).
They focused on two forms
of sexism (hostile, and
benevolent) and how feelings
of entitlement might predict those roles differently for men and women.
Study 3 (N = 79) demonstrates that
benevolent sexism has more pernicious effects when it is expressed by someone with whom women expect to collaborate than when no collaboration is expected with the source
of sexism.
Hart and his co-authors, Jacqueline Hung» 11, a former student
of Hart's, and psychology professors Peter Glick
of Lawrence University and Rachel Dinero
of Cazenovia College, surveyed more than 400 heterosexual men to gauge their responses to questions about their attachment style, hostile and
benevolent sexism, and views on romance.
(Extra credit: +2 points to anyone who caught the
benevolent sexism in the prior paragraph — and another +2 points to anyone who appreciated my use
of Style's «point system.»)
Benevolent but not hostile
sexism uniquely predicted more negative views
of women who engage in premarital sex once other variables were controlled.
They coined the phrase «
benevolent sexism» to describe a more subtle type
of interactions that reinforce the stereotype that men have power.
As mentioned earlier, although the association between hostile and
benevolent sexism and gender stereotypes in romantic relationships — specifically male dominance and male assertiveness factors — is demonstrated in some studies (e.g., Sakallı & Curun, 2001), no research has yet investigated the potential mediating effect
of ambivalent
sexism on sex role orientation and gender stereotypes.
and demonstrated that many women find
benevolent sexist males more favorable than neutral males in terms
of sexism.
Moreover, the present study offers empirical information about the association
of hostile and
benevolent sexism in close relationships.
Therefore, since our participants were mostly female, they might also agree with
benevolent sexism without being aware
of its hostile component and relationship with male dominance.
The present study examined the mediating effects
of ambivalent
sexism (hostile and
benevolent) in the relationship between sex role orientation (masculinity and femininity) and gender stereotypes (dominance and assertiveness) in college students.
Despite these limitations, this study is the first to investigate the mediating effect
of ambivalent
sexism (hostile and
benevolent) between sex role orientation (masculine and feminine) and gender stereotypes (dominance and assertiveness) in romantic relationships.
Common beliefs, such as viewing women as incompetent, are the underpinnings
of both hostile and
benevolent sexism.
Controlling for the effects
of age, relationship experience predicted increased hostile
sexism in girls and increased
benevolent sexism in boys.
In contrast,
benevolent sexism predicted more positive views
of a primary caregiving mother (Gaunt 2013b).
Specifically, hostile
sexism predicted respondents» negative judgments
of a married mother who was the main breadwinner for her family, and
benevolent attitudes toward men predicted respondents» negative judgments
of a primary caregiving father.