We shouldn't fall trap or victim of logic interpretation of defintion
of bible teaching and what the truth in it really intended to convey to people like you and me!
Not exact matches
Graham's philosophy
of «value investing» — which shields investors from substantial error and
teaches them to develop long - term strategies — has made The Intelligent Investor the stock market
bible ever since its original publication in 1949.»
Jason; so sorry you were so misled but the
Bible refers to the earth as a circle (Isa.40: 22) some 700 years before Jesus ever came here and many other descriptions
of what goes on here are so accurate as to make one wonder how man would know and if you are sincerely interested in finding what the
bible really
teaches (and having those misconceptions corrected) just ask and I will be glad to help or go to jw.org for all the free help you will ever need.
Use the
bible for what it was intended, moral stories
of how people should act, although current societal norms would certainly preclude stoning and other current justice and civil rights departures from the rigid
teachings / interpretations
of the
bible.
As long as the mythical language
of the
BIble is left as myth and not
taught as fact, there's no problem.
belonging to a sect that goes as far as to write it's own version
of the ten commandments (yes the catholic ten commandments are different to those in the
bible) means you are not in line with the
teaching of the
bible.
In 325AD, a bunch
of churchmen came together and decided what should be in the
bible, while tossing anything that contradicted what they wanted
taught.
if anyone wants to learn what the
bible really
teaches go to jw.org or watchtower.org or have a serious discussion with one
of Jehovah's Witnesses the next time they visit.
You said, «Go to jw.org to learn what the
bible really
teaches or just ask the next time one comes to your door and Oh did I say Free
of charge?»
One realizes that the first five books
of the «
bible» are «The
teachings of G - d» and not «the law»?
Most religious organizations have their own rules that go directly against the
teaching of the
bible.
It is very like, as with 99.9 %
of religious people, believe what's in the
bible for a single reason — you were
taught to.
Will be interesting when you pass and find you have missed the point
of he
teachings in the
bible.
In a similar fashion we are
taught to treat the
bible as the ultimate source
of truth and not rely on our insights or understanding.
His words did indeed overrule many
of the
teachings of the
bible.
Muslims read the
bible and the torah, and are
taught to respect all people
of the books (
bible, torah).
Humane Vitae came out in 1968 but it reaffirmed what was in the Didache or
teachings of the apostles and also in the
bible.
so glad YOU know what god means... why don't you enlighten the rest
of us becuase the
bible is full
of contradictions... I am going to come here everyday now to see if you can fill me in... but unless you can clear it up for me post haste, I am going to continue to view belief in god as silly and childish which it is and that is how I
teach it... I don't say «all
of you listen: god doesn't exist.»
God's reason for this Testament is to fix the problem
of one
bible, yet hundreds
of Christian churches on earth
teaching their own version
of that one
bible.
If you think the
bible is enough, just look at the hundreds
of traditional - Christian churches that read from one
bible, yet
teach hundreds
of different doctrines, which confuses us as to which interpretation is the truth.
I am for them based on the [belief](can't bold)
of what the
bible teaches, regardless
of what you may have been told in your sunday school.
As far as drawings
of Mohammad, the
bible teaches that one shouldn't worship idols.
I've personally spoken to several people from both aisles and usually found that christians could not step past the
teachings of the
bible.
It is the
teaching of the quran, the the
bible and other religious treatise that is the cause
of all the violence.
Christians have voted to put their God's name on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to
teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws on the fronts
of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people from living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their
bible beliefs.
New testament didn't replace the
teachings of the old, even though they often completely contradict each other, they were an addition to, just like the mormons believe that the book
of mormon is an addition to the
bible not a replacement.
THE
BIBLE DOES NT
TEACH THE OBSERVANCE
OF THOSE PAGAN HOLIDAYS PERIOD!
The
bible does not
teach enforced celibacy, nor were all
of Jesus» followers celibate.
The
bible is then viewed through the lens
of these creeds causing certain interpretations to be favored and other biblical
teachings to be minimized or ignored.
This photo and message put to mind the many preachers I have seen who hold their huge, cross-reference, page - tabbed
Bibles out in front
of them and wave it around, claiming this scripture says this and that scripture says that, either taking things too literally or
teaching incorrectly due to mistranslations.
This is due to the mere fact, that if Roman Catholics were to start reading the
bible themselves, they would see that the man made
teachings within the Vatican through the catholic priests are mostly just man made religious laws, If catholics read the
bible, they would see the truth in the
teachings of GOD and His Son Jesus Christ.
The writers
of the
bible wanted to maintain belief in deities, so added those elements to the
teachings of the Bhudda and voila... the NT.
I'm not much different from you; so thanks again for the inspiration to find a pastor
of a
bible -
teaching church....
I did see, however, the author simply stating that the different denominations have their own language, and sometimes that language may be misguided compared to the
teachings of the
bible and Christ.
The
bible teaches we are to be
of the world not in the world.
Don't you just love how the Christian's «authority» on morality, their «
bible», is so clear on its
teachings that there are now thousands
of Christian denominations each interpreting it differently?
portafolio shower curtain rods american
bible society royal yacht rejuvenation lighting Franklin Marshall dio rca recovery room nursing cannon ink jet printers verian pairing wine and cheese セリーヌ 販売 verbatim flash drives webhosting with php canon zr45 netgear wg511 slk3000 perfekt marketing lg5200 cannon bubble jet printers フランクリン & マーシャル セットアップ science
of getting rich ebook professor
teaches office xp guest chargers raygun magazine micro wireless spy camera sen sen samsung cell phone corn dogs
(A notion simply not
taught in the
bible) But if we place sex in the context
of Jesus definition we discover marriage has nothing to do with it... only love.
I will not give specific school names but they are in the
bible belt region in Alabama and Georgia and one
of the youth I
taught before God showed me that I needed to be in a different church she takes her
bible to school anyway at the risk
of getting in trouble
The majority
of christians have no idea about their faith or what it is to be christian, you see them spout nonsense from a
bible they have never read and judge or even hate others who do not believe their beliefs, all the while not knowing they are going against its
teachings.
To me it is obvious that Jesus, as the character in the
bible, was basically modelled after the Buddha, mcuh
of his
teaching is in the
bible, so «christians» are actually pseudo-buddhists wth a god element thrown in so they can still use god to frighten people with.
Please don't confuse fundamentalism — the literal
teaching of the
bible with modern Christianity.
He has stated that he does not want anyone that does not believe the
bible is 100 % the inerrant word
of god anywhere
teaching his children.
God is Uncategorized
Bible & Theology Topics:
bible reading,
Bible study,
bible translation, Preaching,
teaching, Theology
of the
Bible
Contrary to popular religious
teaching, there is no sex only in marriage mandate given in the
bible... only the protection
of property and lineage rights
of the man who OWNED his wife / wives.
I was always
taught that the
bible was the «word»
of God and that Jesus was the «Logos» living word.
If the church focused on
teaching people to be moral by upholding
bible principles instead
of their own traditions, they wouldn't have to be concerned.
I believe what the
bible teaches and man... if when I hit 80 and die, there is nothing... I would like to order a GUINNESS and 6 shots
of jack... Everything is always only about Jesus... whether you believe it or not.
The sad thing is that many
of us Christians don't really follow the
bible or the
teachings of true christianity especially when we SAY we follow Jesus but in reality truely ARE N't.
Words written in
bible represent mind set
of a hindu, secular, crook self centered writer hundreds
of years after Easu, anointed one, corresponding not to essence
of teachings, but plot to justify hindu Mithra ism, pagan savior ism, in violation
of spirit
of true
teachings.