Dr. Mohler: «Osteen's statements, verbally cushioned in every way he could imagine, fell far short of the full wealth
of biblical conviction.
verbally cushioned in every way he could imagine, fell far short of the full wealth
of biblical conviction.
This, I think, is what the g.ay lobby most fears: that loving, biblical Christians will continue to grow in «loving their neighbors» without abandoning the rest
of their biblical convictions — that what the Bible clearly defines as a sin can only be called that.
Not exact matches
For Gilkey, the «neo»
of his orthodoxy is precisely where he remained most liberal» not just his penchant for talking about
biblical symbols and myths but also his
conviction that the problem
of historical consciousness is the context for all modern theology.
It is one thing for Christians to understand and appreciate Jewish
convictions about the Messianic Age, and hence
of the restoration
of the Land
of Israel, and therefore to acknowledge that one strand
of biblical religion did not «spiritualize» the
biblical promises.
That
biblical vision helped form the bedrock
convictions of the American idea: that government stood under the judgment
of divine and natural law; that government was limited in its reach into human affairs, especially the realm
of conscience; that national greatness was measured by fidelity to the moral truths taught by revelation and inscribed in the world by a demanding yet merciful God; that only a virtuous people could be truly free.
R.R. Reno, general editor
of the Brazos Theological Commentary, writes: «This series
of biblical commentaries was born out
of the
conviction that dogma clarifies rather than obscures.
Many
of the earliest and most effective advocates
of women's rights and dignity were women
of faith whose
convictions were rooted in
biblical truth.
Today's evangelicals rightly identify the loss
of conviction about
Biblical authority as a major source
of the decline
of evangelical fervor in the United Methodist Church.
For myself, certain early formative influences in the early «60s (
biblical criticism, Bernard Lonergan's reflections on method and historical consciousness, and the splendid ambience
of student days in Rome during the Second Vatican Council) solidified my own sharing in the common
conviction that there can be no return to a pre-ecumenical, prepluralistic, ahistorical theology.
It is also evident that they will be, in one way or another, parables
of democratic faith, carrying forward the prophetic
convictions of our
biblical and religious heritage through the story
of our shared secular struggle toward «liberty and justice for all.»
Accordingly, although at some points it will be necessary to state wherein contemporary theologians differ in their interpretations
of the Bible and
of biblical faith, we shall for the most part keep to the main stream
of Christian
conviction.
Though the most Deistic
of the Founding Fathers, even Jefferson was not a full - fledged Deist if we accept that philosophy as having had two fundamental tenets: a rejection
of biblical revelation and a
conviction that God, having created the laws
of the universe, had receded from day - to - day control....
Third
conviction:
biblical teaching, like the law
of the land, must be applied to the living
of our lives.
It is fashionable these days for Scripture scholars to look for substantive differences
of conviction between
biblical writers, but this is in my view an inquiry as shallow and stultifying as it is unfruitful.
They believed the Law was given to them, and they dramatized this
conviction through the
biblical narrative about Moses receiving the tablets from the very hand
of God on Mount Sinai.
And even though I continued to search for a more traditionally orthodox basis for my political commitments, I drew much inspiration and solace from the witness
of Christian people
of more liberal theological
convictions who modeled for me a courageous commitment to the
biblical vision
of justice and peace.
(In my Understanding the Christian Faith, which is intended primarily for laymen, I have given a survey
of the basic
convictions of Christian faith, with a chapter on principles
of biblical interpretation.
In The Spirit and the Forms
of Love Williams analyzes the meaning
of love and indicates what this implies about the nature
of God.104 The classical
conviction that the immutable is the superior is shown to devalue human love and to conflict with the
biblical conception
of God's love.
Decisions about
biblical meanings are not made on the spot, but result from the growth
of habits and
convictions.
The clearest example
of how little
biblical criticism has been value - free is provided by Morton Smith in a statement which is exceptional only for its candor, not its
convictions.
There were frequent comparisons
of the best in «evangelicalism» with what seems to them the worst in «ecumenism»... The most frequent charges against us were theological liberalism, loss
of evangelical
conviction, universalism in theology, substitution
of social action for evangelism, and the search for unity at the expense
of biblical truth.
Historical arguments between their faiths have rarely if ever been over what to call Abraham's God or who was invoked by that call, and Islamic salvation history is rooted in the
conviction that there is a lasting continuity between the dispensations
of Muhammad, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and the
biblical and extrabiblical prophets.
What we shall attempt in this chapter is to discover the
biblical basis for our Christian faith in God, and then suggest the bearing
of this faith on certain other great
convictions of our Christian heritage.
When a Lutheran and a Catholic each talk
of faith, does each define the word by some comprehensive abstract system, or by the complex associations the word has in a great range
of shared
biblical texts, such as Romans 1 with its talk
of faith as that by which we live, I Corinthians 13 with its association
of faith with hope and love, and Hebrews 11 with its definition
of faith as assurance and
conviction?
Applying the
biblical truth will never be easy; trade - offs may even be necessary, but at least all parties involved should become aware
of the pitfalls and rationalizing processes that dilute our commitments and
convictions as believers.
Is a fully developed contextualization the opportunity to hear Scripture speak again with clarity and
conviction, or is it the abdication
of a commitment to
biblical authority?
One takes historical stands (J is a woman; she is
of the royal house and not a scribe
of Rehoboam; she makes this or that wordplay) but then describes these as personal fictions and states with
conviction, «I am not a
biblical scholar.»
The literalism was dictated by their firm
conviction as Christians that every word
of the
biblical text was literally inspired by God.
Biblical monotheism is not speculation about the numerical character
of God but the
conviction that only he is God.
Because
of the liberal agenda
of the writers and our own spiritual
convictions to
biblical Scripture, we are no longer watching the show.