... and this is why this country is so backwards and falling behind the rest of the post-industrial countries... and why is it that these... nuts... will use rules of evidence and «science» to back claims
of biblical proof... but reject the same critria when it is used against them?
Ironically, then, Israel's prime minister is being harmed rather than helped by this employing
of biblical proof - texts on the part of Christian evangelicals to answer political questions in the Middle East.
Not exact matches
Almost all the stories surrounding Jesus (if he did exist, some scholars say their is no
proof of a historical Jesus) were borrowed from earlier myths and used word for word... as well as the rampant literary corruption and forgeries
of Biblical Texts... It is also impossible for God to exist in the Christian version or form they created.
Great book on physical
proofs of Biblical claims.
(And rendering only a partial quote is much like
biblical proof texting in my opinion) I am kind
of a stickler on such details, as a sloppy portrayal
of another's words often leads to inaccurate representation
of their intent.
To be deep in history is certainly, for instance, to cease to be an evangelical
of the kind who allows experience to trump doctrine, who believes doctrine can be read off the surface
of the
biblical text, and who sees no theological or existential problem that can not be solved with a
proof text or two.
He also could have easily placed the fake bones on dinosaurs under the ground to test those lacking in faith... as well as removed any evidence
of the global flood after the fact because leaving definitive
proof of biblical events is unnecessary when all you should really need is faith...
creationism is far from an adult theory, its a child like story with fantasy elements based on myth and NO science, we always hear about these crazy people trying to outlaw evolution.But has you stated we have billions
of years
of evidence, thanks for helping us evolutionists out, unfortunately you have none, just a book, no science, no artifacts, no garden
of eden, no bones
of adam or eve or even the snake for that matter, no ark, no
proof of a
biblical flood, no
proof of a created world by a higher power, no nothing..
A certain historical movement once tended to visualize the
biblical revelation, in order to restore sight to its former position, and searched on the intellectual level for
proofs of the existence
of God.
Perhaps, though, the
biblical character
of Jesus, rather than being entirely mythical, was based on one
of many Jewish messiah claimants who had followers who euhemerized his life to a greater extent than those
of other such claimants, so that in time the stories were so embellished that he became a god in them, but the Tesimonium Flavianum is hardly
proof of his existence.
But since the New Testament itself contains various kinds
of social witness — as its use both for and against slavery and patriarchy, for example, shows — debate can degenerate into mere thrust and parry
of proof - texts with no possibility
of resolution, or
of even honest concession that both sides can claim
biblical warrant.
Sometimes known as the history «
of «salvation school and sometimes as the
biblical theology movement, this school
of thought» like Barth's theology» roundly dismissed natural theology and philosophical
proofs for the existence
of God.
There is simply no
biblical support for
proof obviating faith, or the faith that God desires requires a lack
of proof as to His reality.
The
biblical text seems to serve as a source
of proof texts to manipulate the laity into accomplishing the churches agenda, some
of which is good (fellowship, salvation, prayer, etc.), some
of it is not.
Proof texts from Proverbs are not sufficient to make a view
of private property
biblical.
If so, that would be extra
Biblical historical
proof of Christ.
I will not engage in a contest
of pitting «experts» opinions against each other as such an exercise is as pointless as
biblical proof texting.
The Bible is a storehouse
of proof texts into which the believer may dip when seeking «
biblical warrant» for his or her own views on current issues.
You say It's really disappointing to see someone who rides on the notion
of unity and truth
of scripture to use little to no logical,
biblical or historical
proof to make a sound case against what many do see as overly harsh.
These passages served as fundamental
proof texts to those who were arguing that slavery was God's will and accusing abolitionists
of failing to obey
biblical mandates.
The reference to the misuse
of scripture in ATIA is to remind both teachers and students not to engage in ill - judged
proof - texting in line with «The Interpretation
of the Bible and the Church» (The Pontifical
Biblical Commission).
«The much - touted «
biblical argument» in support
of corporal punishment is founded upon
proof - texting a few isolated passages from Proverbs.
In the horrific days and weeks which followed, this uninteresting comment would take on the role
of Biblical scripture, repeated throughout the legal process as
proof that she was coming to the UK to work.
Out
of place artifacts (OOPART) are
proof that mankind has been here for millions
of years, contrary to the
biblical story that The first and the best free dating site for Expats in Germany.
Many accept radiometric dating methods as
proof that the earth is millions
of years old, in contrast to the
biblical timeline.
The Coming End - Time Awakening:
Biblical Proof that there is a Great Move
of God during the Great Tribulation
The tactic
of the anti-green faction is to demand a
biblical standard
of proof..