Also, many
of the biblical prophets come down pretty hard on greed and gluttony, and even Paul has some harsh words for those who overeat (1 Cor 11).
His call to a fresh «innocence of becoming» and «newness of life» is at least a faint echo
of the biblical prophets and St. Paul, only without the virtues of love and hope.
The role
of the biblical prophets was always to bring a strong and disruptive voice to their own communities.
Christian Zionists have traded the mantle
of the biblical prophets for an idolatry of militarism and the nation state.
Not exact matches
This interpretation is grounded in
biblical themes — the vision
of the Hebrew
prophets of a branch growing from the seemingly dead stump
of the Davidic royal line, and,
of course, the central Christian affirmation
of the death and resurrection
of Jesus.
For if the words
of the
prophets are not given a «spiritual» sense, there is no
biblical and theological basis for the confession that Jesus
of Nazareth is the Christ.
The
Biblical quote didn't specify to beware
of the false
prophet Joseph Smith.
Biblical prophets practice it which means God approves
of it.
The seeming correspondence between events in our own day and the language
of the
prophets has prompted Christians to look with fresh eyes on the
biblical promises about the Land and the prophetic oracles about return and restoration.
And to say that
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning
of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those
of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later
prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament
prophets and apostles.
Here's a
biblical quote where jesus says we should follow the OT: Jesus orders Christians to follow the Law
of Moses in the Old Testament: «Do not think that I [Jesus] have come to abolish the Law or the
Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
The
biblical prophets used some devices
of dystopian writing to drive home the message that the disastrous future was already breaking into the present; but within the Covenant framework they could locate hope.
As a leader there will be periods
of loneliness, as we see in the lives
of many
biblical leaders, and the
prophets.
So I am always delighted when I come across a
biblical passage like that in Isaiah 25:6 - 9 where the
prophet says: «On this mountain the Lord
of hosts will make for all people a feast
of fat things....
On some lips the multiplicity
of biblical citations, from the Hebrew
prophets and from Jesus, would have been wearying.
The
biblical evidence we have just surveyed points to a period
of coexistence
of seer and
prophet and a popular tendency to equate the two offices.
Estrangement and alienation are not
biblical terms, but they are implied in the
biblical description
of the human predicament; the expulsion from paradise, the hostility between humanity and nature, the hostility
of person against person,
of nation against nation, and
of the continuous complaint
of the
prophets against the rulers.
The very arrangement
of the
biblical books in the Hebrew canon
of scripture presupposes this definition
of prophetism.1 Between the first division
of the Law and the third division
of the Writings, the central category
of the
Prophets embraces not only the books of the prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve prophets from Hosea to Malachi (all together termed «Latter Prophets») but also the historical writings of Joshua, Judges, and the books of Samuel and Kings («Former Prophets») In this way the Hebrew Bible formally and appropriately acknowledges that prophetism is more than the prophet and his work, that it is also a way of looking at, understanding, and interpreting
Prophets embraces not only the books
of the
prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve prophets from Hosea to Malachi (all together termed «Latter Prophets») but also the historical writings of Joshua, Judges, and the books of Samuel and Kings («Former Prophets») In this way the Hebrew Bible formally and appropriately acknowledges that prophetism is more than the prophet and his work, that it is also a way of looking at, understanding, and interpreting
prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve
prophets from Hosea to Malachi (all together termed «Latter Prophets») but also the historical writings of Joshua, Judges, and the books of Samuel and Kings («Former Prophets») In this way the Hebrew Bible formally and appropriately acknowledges that prophetism is more than the prophet and his work, that it is also a way of looking at, understanding, and interpreting
prophets from Hosea to Malachi (all together termed «Latter
Prophets») but also the historical writings of Joshua, Judges, and the books of Samuel and Kings («Former Prophets») In this way the Hebrew Bible formally and appropriately acknowledges that prophetism is more than the prophet and his work, that it is also a way of looking at, understanding, and interpreting
Prophets») but also the historical writings
of Joshua, Judges, and the books
of Samuel and Kings («Former
Prophets») In this way the Hebrew Bible formally and appropriately acknowledges that prophetism is more than the prophet and his work, that it is also a way of looking at, understanding, and interpreting
Prophets») In this way the Hebrew Bible formally and appropriately acknowledges that prophetism is more than the
prophet and his work, that it is also a way
of looking at, understanding, and interpreting history.
Together with the opening line
of the Letter to the Hebrews («In ancient times God spoke to man through
prophets and in varied ways, but now he speaks through Christ, His Son...»), as well as many other
biblical texts, this passage reveals to us a startling truth.
It can also be referred to as the prophetic premise, since it was the
biblical prophets who first taught that «no work
of man's hand or brain should ever be regarded as absolute, as permanent, as definitive» (Garaudy, 1:68).
Scripture recognizes the danger that self - deception poses for the life
of faith, and no
biblical story illustrates the phenomenon
of self - deception better than that
of King David and Nathan the
prophet.
The
biblical prophets, who spoke out for peace and justice, are often cited as sources
of strength and hope.
It was very troubling for some
of the
Biblical authors to comprehend — especially the
prophets (cf. Jeremiah 12).
(Ibid., «
Biblical Leadership,» p. 133; cf. ibid., «The Man
of Today and the Jewish Bible,» p. 94 f., «False
Prophets,» p. 114.)
Isaiah 24 offers one
of the most eloquent statements
of this
biblical vision that is found particularly in the
prophets of the Hebrew Scriptures.
Hermann Gunkel, in a sense the unique father
of us all in modern
biblical scholarship, despite his insistence on saga's supervision
of the Elijah narratives as we receive them, nevertheless affirms on the one hand Elijah's kinship with the greatest
of all ministers
of ancient Israel, Moses, in their mutual contention with their own people; and, on the other hand, Elijah's legitimate and immediate relationship to the great
prophets who follow him and who, essentially, continue the work he began.
Yet, I believe that his was a genuine encounter with God and that his was a prophetic message, akin to that
of the great
Biblical prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah.
That's what
prophets and ministers in the
biblical faith - with all too uncommon exception - have been doing for thousands
of years.
In the
biblical account, John the Baptist was a
prophet and the cousin
of Jesus.
Then every pastor, priest, and
prophet begins to preach about Eve and Delilah,
biblical women culturally synonymous with the evils
of temptation and the fall
of men.
Drawing on
biblical and church tradition, he spoke
of the roles
of pastor, priest,
prophet and king as historically normative for the Christian ministry.
The revelations are introduced simply by the word Say, more or less the
Biblical equivalent
of the phrase so frequently found in the
prophets, «Thus saith the Lord.»
In the third part we will have recourse to the exegesis
of testimony in the
biblical prophets and in the New Testament.
Again and again they see in
Biblical passages a great foreshadowing
of the coming
of the
Prophet of Allah.19
The very last verse
of the
biblical books
of the
prophets reads, «Look, I will send you the
prophet Elijah before the great and terrible day
of the Lord comes.
The fall
of Adam and Eve, the covenants with Israel and its deliverance from bondage, its falling away and punishment through new sufferings, the speaking
of the divine word through the
prophets, the birth
of Christ in human flesh, the life and death
of Jesus, the experience
of the resurrection, and the history
of the Church, the expectation
of the final events and the established reign
of God in love and peace — all this is the
Biblical understanding
of what God has done, is doing, and will continue to do for the judgment and redemption
of the world.
with the exception
of some small bits out
of the books
of the
prophets — virtually none
of the other
biblical scribblings were contemporaneous with events described within them, and ALL
of the texts were subject to revision for a really long time from people who came along after they were originally written.
It is generally agreed among
biblical scholars that in these servant passages, the
prophet was not referring to a particular individual but was calling his people to become the suffering servant
of all mankind.
It is quite otherwise, however, with Elijah, the ninth century
prophet, who, according to the
Biblical tradition, had been carried up to heaven in a whirlwind riding in a chariot
of fire, drawn by horses
of fire.13 Elijah had made such an impression on the men
of his own generation as a man
of vitality and divine power that he continued to be a living legend.
My experiences
of God's love were very clear to me, and I simply assumed, as did most
biblical writers, that God's love had been made abundantly clear in the miracles
of the Exodus, the words
of the
prophets, the work
of Christ.
Religious proponents
of international law could draw on the
prophets for
biblical support: Amos, Hosea, Micah and others discerned Yahweh's law as both impartial and international, striking against the arrogant pretensions
of all people and nations who violate human rights in the belief that God is on their side.
Historical arguments between their faiths have rarely if ever been over what to call Abraham's God or who was invoked by that call, and Islamic salvation history is rooted in the conviction that there is a lasting continuity between the dispensations
of Muhammad, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and the
biblical and extrabiblical
prophets.
gave rise to the Hindu Upanishads and to Buddhism in India, to the religions
of Lao - Tzu and Confucius in China, to the eschatological ideas
of Zoroaster in Persia, to the classical
biblical prophets in Israel and Judah, and to the philosophy
of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle in the Greek world.
But the activists, such as the
biblical prophets, claim that the life
of social concern is thoroughly religious, and they make «doing justice» the very heart
of any authentic religious relation to the sacred mystery
of God.
13 Norman Perrin in his The Kingdom
of God in the Teaching
of Jesus dismisses it as being not authentically
biblical in a chapter entitled «The American View
of Jesus as a
Prophet.»
A
Biblical example
of one who has taken the red pill would be Ezekiel, who prophesies against something quite similar to the Matrix in Ezekiel 13:10 NLT, «evil
prophets deceive my people by saying, «All is peaceful» when there is no peace at all!
We venture the claim not only that Isaiah is central to prophecy hut that no
prophet stands more nearly in the center
of biblical theology nor anticipates in such comprehensive fashion many
of the affirmations
of the New Testament community.
(Jer 32:17).3 What is narrated at the very beginning
of the
biblical record, God's creating
of all that is, also pervades the subsequent literature down through the
prophets and the Wisdom tradition.4
The list
of biblical personages who fasted reads like a «Who's Who»
of scriptures: Moses the lawgiver, David the king, Elijah the
prophet, Esther the queen, Daniel the seer, Anna the prophetess, Paul the apostle, Jesus Christ the incarnate Son.
In my own case, it was not only Tillich plus Troeltsch with his sometime roommate Max Weber and Adams with his colleague George H. Williams who were influential, but also Walter Rauschenbusch's use
of the social analysis
of his day to restate
biblical themes; Reinhold Niebuhr's refutation in The Nature and Destiny
of Man
of Marx's, Kant's, Nietzsche's and Freud's understanding
of human nature; Talcott Parsons's systematic study
of the role
of religious values in The Structure
of Social Action; George Ernest Wright's exposition
of the
Prophets; and Masatoshi Nagatomi's gentle introduction to Asian modes
of thought.