The earlier ones already showed the relation of Scripture to theology in Pentecostal practice: such works were simple, uncritical explanations
of biblical teaching for recent converts and for new but untrained ministers.
But that kind of clarification of my understanding
of biblical teaching for evangelical groups has usually been a preface to a plea for sexual humility.
Not exact matches
I'm impressed by the ability
of some
of these so - called Christian leaders» attempts to rationalize their support
for Obama and / or his positions despite
Biblical teachings.
Investment
for return (as Rodney Stark relates in The Victory
of Reason) largely occurred against the grain
of Church
teaching, the Spanish Scholastics being largely ignored, and it was Calvin's application
of biblical law to trade and commerce that created the competitive tension under which a millennium
of misapplication and resultant economic suppression could begin to be corrected.
And to say that
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that
for certain
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning
of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those
of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.
The Catholic Church is and has been the
Biblical teaching authority
for ALL Christians
for 2000 + years and will continue to be because Jesus said all the powers
of hell (including propserity organizations operating under the pretext
of Christianity) would NOT prevail against it.
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part
of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence
of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence
of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure
for husbands and wives, but not
for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women
teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line
of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry
of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy
of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws
of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading
of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic
for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse
of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
Obama went on to frame decisions as disparate as ending tax breaks
for the wealthy and defending foreign aid as examples
of biblical principles in action, quoting Jesus»
teaching that «
for unto whom much is given, much shall be required» and invoking the «
biblical call to care
for the least
of these.»
To the God
of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, thanks
for the rhythm
of exile and return,
for teaching us how to argue and
for the
biblical book
of Ecclesiastes (Oh, and Bob Dylan and Woody Allen,
of course).
I'm looking to eventually
teach theology, but in between my personal studies, an obsessive reading habit, and spending far too much money on coffee, I started a blog called New Ways Forward as an outlet
for some
of my random thoughts and a way to interact with others who share a passion
for theology,
Biblical studies, and social justice.
Obviously, I'm a big advocate
for mutual submission in marriage, as that is what I believe those
biblical passages ultimately
teach and this is what works best in our marriage, but more important than adopting a single household model — either patriarchal or egalitarian — is adopting the posture
of Jesus Christ, who emptied himself
of power and took the role
of servant.
Egalitarians and Christian feminists both share a common denominator — that justice and equality
for females is a
biblical ideal that can and should be part
of the moral
teachings and practices
of Christians.
The presence
of biblical support was not the reason
for the
teaching.
Christmas, Easter... all others have no
Biblical basis
for celebrating, and as practiced today, are a travesty
of the principles Jesus lived by and
taught.
It is sort
of the «Give a man a fish, feed him
for a day;
Teach a man to fish, feed him
for a lifetime» approach to
biblical prophecy.
These all are quite accurate translations
of the
Biblical text, and so are good
for preaching and
teaching.
But to claim some
biblical justification
for something so directly contrary to the
teaching of Christ is (I think I have said this before) a perversion
of the text.
Therefore, ANY Church that stands upon and
teaches biblical morals and ethics become «impossible»
for those folks to be a part
of.
Instead
of settling
for the minimum in
biblical languages, I try to
teach that minimum and introduce an electronic product that will make translation almost nice.
A wise interpreter would set this verse aside as too vague and unclear on this particular issue and seek
Biblical truth on this subject in the clear passages throughout the Bible that
teach that God does not hold children to account
for the sins
of their parents!
We are called to be light and salt, and one way to do this is to stand up and speak out
FOR BIBLICAL VALUES and against sin... yes,
of course we should be preaching /
teaching / living God's «theology
of marriage» in our own marriages...... but God has clearly defined marriage as between one man and one woman, and therefore, when our government says it's otherwise, we should be light and salt and speak up, and vote accordingly.
While I appreciate the approach that DTS
teaches, it can really only be followed by expert scholars and theologians, and is not feasible
for the average student
of Scripture, which indicates to me that it is not the only oven the best way
of reading and interpreting the
biblical text.
(1)
Biblical teaching is coherent and self - consistent:
for, as I said above, with whatever variety
of literary form and personal style from writer to writer and with whatever additions and amendments as redemptive history progressed, it all proceeds from one source; namely, the mind
of God the Holy Spirit.
I wanted to learn and to
teach a method
of publically reading scripture,
for example, that respected the intrinsic value
of studying
biblical texts while enhancing their communicative value in worship.
The main
biblical evidence is (1) the stories
of the creation (Gen.I: 26 - 27 with 5:1 - 2; 2:18 - 25) and the fall (3:16 - 20); (2) Jesus» respect
for women, whom he consistently treated as men's equals (Luke 8:1 - 3; 10:38 - 42; 11:28 - 28; 13:10 - 17; 21:1 - 4; Mark 5:22 - 42; John 4:7 - 38; 8:3 - 11; 12:1 - 8; (3) references to women ministering in the apostolic church by prophesying, leading in prayer,
teaching, practicing Samaritanship both informally and as widows and deacons, and laboring in the gospel with Apostles (Acts 2:17 - 21; 9:36 - 42; 18:24 - 26; 21:9 Rom.
A few years ago, Swedish pastor Ake Green was sentenced to one month in prison
for preaching on the
biblical teaching against sexual immorality from the pulpit
of his small church in Borgholm.
For him this doctrine is not only the fundamental discriminator whereby one discerns the «true Christian» but also the universal
teaching of the Christian church — at least prior to the rise
of biblical criticism.
I discovered that Yoder
taught not at Goshen College but rather in Elkhart at the Associated Mennonite
Biblical Seminary, but in my exploration
of Goshen I discovered that Yoder had written numerous pamphlets that could be bought off a rack in College Church
for a dime a piece.
Pastoring conservative churches
for 20 + years has
taught me that too many professed Christians don't know what they might believe because
of self induced
Biblical illiteracy.
I differ in that I find in Christ a basis
for critical liberation from many aspects
of Biblical teaching.
On
Biblical grounds, we note,
for example, that Jesus» ministry is summarized in the Gospels in ways like the following: «And he went about all Galilee,
teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel
of the kingdom and healing every disease and every infirmity among the people.»
A more sophisticated screening
of Scripture is carried out by others who claim that we must look in Scripture
for the «locus classicus»
of a
Biblical doctrine and concentrate on its
teaching, interpreting all else in light
of its truth.
All these scriptures /
Biblical teachings created a problem
for me as over the years when I would experience psychotic symptoms and psychic phenomena as a result
of intense / deep prayer and meditation, I actually thought that God was trying to show me a sign or tell me something or he was leading me in a particular direction.
Thus the gospel was concentrated in the person
of Jesus; the hope
of the Kingdom receded and became eventually only another name
for «heaven,» the other world, the state
of bliss beyond death, or, as in Thomas Aquinas, a term
for the divine theodicy in general — though in truth this interpretation really emphasized a fundamental element in the whole
biblical conception, in Jesus»
teaching as elsewhere — and thus an intellectual concept
of the person
of Jesus tended to become central
for Christian doctrine, theology, and devotion, rather than the person
of God, his sovereignty and his redemptive will, his wisdom and his love.
Luckily, I also group up in a Christian home and was
taught the importance
of caring
for the earth as a
biblical mandate (Genesis 2:15).
James Dobson
taught, in no uncertain terms, that the
biblical ideal was
for women with young children to stay home instead
of work.
Let me say
for the record that I do not believe that there are any
biblical grounds
for women being elders or
teaching pastors
of a church.
In essence
for many years as a result
of all the complex
biblical teaching I have been immersed with and confused by, I find Jeremy that the clear way you put it helps a great deal.
In his book Overcoming Shame: Let Go
of Others» Expectations and Embrace God's Acceptance, he combines psychological research,
biblical teachings, and clinical experience to provide a valuable resource
for readers.
The solution is to get back to solid
Biblical teaching, servant leadership, and taking spiritual warfare seriously — giving the men something real to fight
for: the Gospel
of Jesus Christ.
The
Biblical pattern and Christ's pattern
for teaching in the gathering
of the congregation is simply
teaching the Bible simply.
It is on the basis
of «
biblical teaching» that we would challenge The Prayer
of Jabez,
for it seriously distorts that
teaching.
Rigorous use
of biblical criticism prevents psychologizing and allegorizing, insofar as the attempt is made to recover what Jesus actually
taught and how the church in fact interpreted his
teaching, and only then to inquire into its psycho - social and symbolic meaning, both
for Jesus and the church, and
for us today.
Their reading
of biblical teachings about particular kinds
of sexual activity often fails to account
for the cultural setting and circumstances in which each book
of the Bible was written.
Your article, post, whatever it is (I'm new to this kind
of thing) gave me some
of the answers I was looking
for and helped me find the problems with the
biblical logic I was
taught.
One can point to the emergence
of a variety
of critical approaches to religion in general, and to Christianity in particular, which have contributed to the breakdown
of certainties: These include historical - critical and other new methods
for the study
of biblical texts, feminist criticism
of Christian history and theology, Marxist analysis
of the function
of religious communities, black studies pointing to long - obscured realities, sociological and anthropological research in regard to cross-cultural religious life, and examinations
of traditional
teachings by non-Western scholars.
In my next post I will turn to Ahab and Jezebel
for another
biblical example
of a man and his wife failing together in the task
of teaching and learning the word
of the LORD.
It is not difficult to imagine a catechism
for children
teaching them the
biblical narrative and helping them construct a sense
of the whole that goes beyond the bits and pieces
of scripture which they typically are
taught.
«That said, if the churches do not take the opportunity now to «advocate» and «
teach» why same - sex marriage is wrong
for everyone (i.e., harmful to children, to the couple, and undermining
of a culture
of marriage), religious people should not expect to find a lot
of sympathy
for their right to exercise their religious freedom to dissent from same - sex marriage,» Esbeck told CT. «In other words, church leaders no longer enjoy the luxury
of not
teaching biblical marriage, as much as large numbers
of the laity don't want to hear it.
Hence with His own statements, so far as they are His own, such a «proportionate interpretation», in a fine phrase from Bishop Westcott, is required quite as much as it is required
for other pieces
of biblical teaching.