Sentences with phrase «of big bang theory»

it is interesting to see that the overwhelming orthodoxy of the CO2 theory is starting to be correlated with the overwhelming orthodoxy of the big bang theory.

Big Bang Theory - Concise synopsis of the big bang theory's background, historical foundations, major problems.

The Big Bang Theory is an American television sitcom created by Chuck Lorre and Bill Prady, both of whom serve as executive producers on the series, along Big Bang Theory - Concise synopsis of the big bang theory's background, historical foundations, major problems.

I am a big fan of the big bang theory tv show.

Hubble's Law is a major piece of evidence that the universe is expanding — his work formed the basis of the big bang theory of the origin of the universe.

«The horizon problem» has perplexed advocates of the big bang theory for decades, because they see no way that opposite sides of the universe, which are so far apart today, could ever have interacted with each other — even at the speed of light.

Due to how orderly and precise creation is, the chance of the big bang theory or coincidence happening is statistically 0.

There are calls for a bishop, who it's said came up with an early version of the big bang theory, to... More

There is no real proof of the big bang theory, but there is definite proof that humans and apes evolved from the same ancestor.

It doesn't even require a modification of big bang theory.

On the atheist side, undeniable scientific proof of the big bang theory and evolution do not disprove the existence of God.

where is the proof of the big bang theory?

Due to how orderly and precise creation is, the chance of the big bang theory or creation being a coincidence is statistically 0.

However not many know that it was the Catholic priest who gave it to us = Father Georges Lemaître = Father of big bang theory.

Your understanding of the big bang theory is laughable.

Science is scrutinized as will the recent evidence of the big bang theory.

Not exact matches

The big bang theory, though not proven, DOES have a mountain of scientific FACTS that support it!

Science theories satisfy my fundamental answers, for me such event of unimaginably scale and precision such as the big bang that brought everything into existence 14.7 billions of years ago simply can not just happen, by chance, or without intent.

but not taught as fact and right after science class where they learn Darwin's theory of evolution, watch videos on the big bang theory, have a field trip where they meet up with an archeologist to uncover one of our ancestors remains that weren't as evolved, learn how old the earth truely is etc.....

As for numerologists, scientists, and non-believers in general... to explain anything within our universe completely and fully (even the big bang theory or evolution), one must eventually take a leap of faith and believe in something that equations or definitions can't quantify.

[radicalmoderat] It was a Catholic priest / astronomer who 1st developed the big bang theory for the creation of the Universe.

If there's another theory re where the big bang came from and what caused it [and of course what caused the cause, ad infinitum] then I would be happy to hear you explain it.

You do of course realize that it is reasonable to believe in God and accept the big bang theory, evolution and a 4.5 billion year old earth?

And CMB, like Nonimus has pointed out, the reason why the theory of the big bang (which there was no explosion by the way) is the way it is.

I do agree that all members of the Senate and House committees on Science should be asked whether they accept the big bang theory, evolution and a 4.5 billion year - old earth — or be disqualified.

@Chad «Of course you are free to not know whatever you do nt want to know, however the prevailing cosmological theory (big bang) on the origin of the universe says that it is 13.75 billion years old.&raquOf course you are free to not know whatever you do nt want to know, however the prevailing cosmological theory (big bang) on the origin of the universe says that it is 13.75 billion years old.&raquof the universe says that it is 13.75 billion years old.»

I'm well versed in the scientific method and that has led me to believe that «big bang theory» is about as supportable as the «flat earth theory» of the 16th century.

During this short time, we don't have the apparatus to fully understand God, but many of us see the fallacy of believing in things like the «big bang» theory where ordered things come from nothingness.

This full view of God lifts up a God who is more than a Creator who made the world out of nothing, more than the God of the big - bang theory who began the universe and then left it to run on its own -

Proponents of this line of argument hold to the big bang theory of the universe evolving from nothing.

how the hell does the big bang theory lend support of a «creator»???? Yes creation occurred in it's literal definition, but how / whom / is unknown.

In fact, quite the opposite, it shows that natural forces coalesced to create the condition for the big bang and bolsters the theory of multiverses (multiple universes).

In explaining the scientific theory that the universe originated in a big bang, Paul Davies remarked: «The conditions at the big bang imply an infinite distortion of time, so that the very concept of time (and space) can not be extended back beyond the big bang» (24).

You haven't thought out any of the flawed arguments of evolution or the big bang theory to it's conclusion.

While the old testament and the bible (as in the new testament) refer to the creation of the heavens and earth (as well as the Quran for Muslims), I find it humbling that the Quran went even further to attest to the WAY this creation took place (in other words the Big bang theory is a testament to this verse).

... So all this author was pointing out is that the theory of the big bang in no way refutes or is in conflict with a theological belief of creation, as in, «In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth» or for that matter a Buddhist belief of constant recreation.

The big bang is not part of the theory of evolution.

Like the theory of evolution or the big bang theory.

Scientists are quite aware of the weaknesses of the evidence supporting various theories, including evolution and the big bang.

How would a person living in a desert know these things without actually someone telling him this?!!! And who is that someone?!!! No one at that time knew anything about big bang theory?!! The actual translation of the arabic word رتقا is it was like a fabric that got torn apart?!!! Isn't that big bang?!! And the other part that was proven too is that everything alive needs water to live?!!! How did they know that then?!!! Islam and science support each other and science only getting to prove things now which was mentioned 1500 years ago in the Quran!!!

The big bang theory is part of physics and cosmology, and only explains why the galaxies appear to all be moving away from the same central point.

Of course nothing you said in that paragraph coincides with anything in the theory of evolution, or with the big banOf course nothing you said in that paragraph coincides with anything in the theory of evolution, or with the big banof evolution, or with the big bang.

However, if there are groups of atheists, and I am not saying there are, with organizing principles like, elevating humanity, belief in evolution, belief in the big bang theory absent God, or other such beliefs consistent with atheism as a belief, AND they organize to promote those beliefs and theories, or educate people regarding their belief that there is no God, then those groups consti tute a religious organization.

Some atheists think that the «big bang theory» and «theory of evolution» is what started it all.

You and I both agree that a very large number of religious people accept the big bang theory as a reasonable description of the early formation of our observable universe.

After all It was the Catholic priest who gave us the best explanation as of today how the universe started = big bang theory.

Science continues to compile more and more experimental data to support evolution, genetic modification, and the big bang theory of the universe.

I do not see anyone other than you even talk about big bang theory and now you accuse someone else of not knowing it from evolution.

Are you saying that you no longer have any problem with evolution, the big bang theory, radio carbon dating, the age of the Earth, the scientific unlikelihood of the great flood, and the archeological evidence against the chronology of the bible story?

that we do nt settle with a simplistic explanation due to our lazyness to find out... example of lazyness thinkin... the big bang theory is back by string theory..