Sentences with phrase «of blatant fraud»

The lack of any monitoring by the KC on their basic registration scheme is really disturbing to me, especially after cases of blatant fraud like the Lisa Walsh case.

Not exact matches

A possible snag right now is that the Securities and Exchange Commission has put the kibosh on ICOs of all sorts following a wave of speculative mania and blatant fraud involving tokens.

The fraud and corruption at all levels of Government and Corporate America has become glaringly blatant.

People stopped using them to try to buy stuff, hoarded them for speculative gains instead, and then grumbled when exchanges were hacked, their windfalls stolen or frozen and many of the altcoin offerings turned out to be blatant frauds.

And now investors know why: «blatant fraud at the very top level of Akorn's executive team, stunning evidence of blatant and pervasive data integrity violations,» according to a Reuters report on the court filing.

That means more than a third of the surveyed bitcoin investors are planning to commit blatant tax fraud.

«All facts available indicates that the loan is blatant fraud, and gross man's inhumanity to man; we therefore call on the Central Bank of Nigeria and Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to stop the government from accessing the loan facility.

Over the span of Trump's business career, project after project has produced allegations of bad faith, broken promises, blatant lies or outright fraud.

How can we take seriously the daily hand - wringing about fraud, non-replication, and biased statistics when in so blatant a case of data manipulation (where flawed predictors were the basis for surgery and chemotherapy regimens) we read: «Respondent neither admits nor denies ORI's findings of research misconduct»?

Predatory Lending: A type of lending that falls between appropriate risk - based pricing and blatant fraud and combines certain products, terms, prices and practices.

Many of the courses were blatant scams and frauds from unscrupulous vendors.

Labor and the Greens have united to bury any effort to call the wind industry to account — and run a constant smoke - screen of blatant lies and half - truths designed to deflect attention from the greatest environmental and economic fraud of all time.

This recent post via Real Climate Science on NASA tampering of Sea - level rise highlights the blatant malfeasance that these government funded institutions will undertake in order to push the man - made global warming climate change agenda, and keep the «Greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud in history» rolling and the billions upon billions of taxpayer funds flowing...

A beleaguered federal agency appears to be implicated in the most blatant and extreme case of climate data fraud yet seen.

The criminal aspect is not only the failure of the alarmsits to observe these basic facts bu the Hockeystick fraud giving hundreds of times the weighting to faulty Bristlecone pine proxy data as to other sets in order to give a desired result, the blatant tampering of Data to warm the past with extremely dubious reasons, the NZ NWA scandal where they demonstrably altered data to fit the alarmist agenda, the Darwin Australia tampering, the crude attempt to prove a «hotspot» by making the base temperature representation red and thus appear hot in a now debunked graph etc Then there's the Nazi / Stalin / Lenin / Maoesque attempts to silence debate.

I'm not sure I follow you... If I read a paper and hypothesise that «their result isn't correct because they screwed up their data», then this would be a blatant accusation of incompetence or fraud.

If it is notarized, the third - party notary as well as one of the parties has to be engaged in blatant fraud, and it is likely that an arbitrator or court would not believe that this happened.

Of course there is a chance that the company as a whole is doing fraud, but I think that would be way too blatant move.