Sentences with phrase «of bodies of both animals»

After Josiah's reforms and his pollution of the accursed spot, it became an object of horror to the Jews and was used for the incineration of refuse and of the bodies of animals and criminals, and in general for the disposal of anything noisome and unclean.

Vogels explains: «We showed the monkeys images of bodies of both animals and human beings, while covering up specific body parts.

liver An organ of the body of animals with backbones that performs a number of important functions.

Not exact matches

None other than Charles Darwin wrote the first academic investigation into body language, his «The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals,» published back in 1872.

In a similar fashion, the Body Shop got skewered when a magazine article questioned its claims about animal testing, alleged that the company used petrochemicals in some of its «natural» products, and charged that its Trade Not Aid program accounted for less of its supplies than it had claimed.

Animal studies of the chemical have found it has no health effects on reproduction or development at doses up to at least 100 mg per kg of body - weight per day.

Ashley now shares her story, tips, and easy vegan recipes in hopes of encouraging others to live a life that is not only kind their own bodies, but to the animals and planet as well!

The B.C. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (BC SPCA) is the body which conducts cruelty investigations of pet and wild animals in British CoAnimals (BC SPCA) is the body which conducts cruelty investigations of pet and wild animals in British Coanimals in British Columbia.

Much of the effect can likely be explained by researchers unconsciously giving hints or suggestions to their human or animal subjects, perhaps in something as subtle as body language or tone of voice.

«Everything that has been done for the aged, the sick, the weak in body and in mind, the animal, the child, the woman has been done under the inspiration of Christianity.»

The physical universe is not a mere shadow, it is a drama of billions of actors, some minute, blindly moving atoms, some living plants and moving animals, and some intelligent body - persons enacting an evolutionary history whose scenario still remains open to the future.

The human body alone is to complex to be a random act of any set of molecules; and that's not counting the billions of other species of animals, plants, and insects.

The «crocoduck» was an animal with the head of a crocodile and the body of a duck» — Kirk Cameron

The atheists will never be able to withstand what God has planned for them, when they enter hell, they will be dragged on their faces, they will be chained like animals, hot boiling water will be poured on all their bodies, every time their skin gets burned, God replaces their skin with new skin so they can get burned again, they will drink hot boiling water and the puss that comes out of their burning skin and body, they will eat from a tree that when eaten causes their stomach to burn in flame, their will be tough strong huge angles that will have no mercy and they will torrcher them without feeling sorry for them, i ask you, do you want to go to a place like this that the atheist will end up in

The theory of societies, like modern general systems theory, pictures a world made up of societies within societies (systems within systems) That is, societies do not just line up side by side like mosaics — they form «nested hierarchies» that go from subatomic particles through cells to animal bodies, or through stars to galaxies.

The human body comes about from the seed and egg of parents in common with other animals, but the soul is created immediately by God's loving command and wise, eternal will.

i do nt understand what religous people really believe is waiting for them in an afterlife when we know for a fact that the body doesn't go there and the fact that animals apparently cant go to heaven because they have no soul is well thats just good old conceited man made rubbish that is everywhere in the bible and before i get attacked i was raised religious and got very religious for a few years till i actually thought about it and applyed logic to it after that the whole concept of religion made me feel sick

Other animals may be said to be bodies that have spirits; we may be said to be spirits that possess bodies.24 This is not to introduce a new dualism but only to recognize that, although our bodies are expressions of us both unconsciously and consciously, we can reflect about them and distance ourselves from them.

Even the passage from without to within the animal body is the enhancement of the mental pole in the occasions.

If we view the soul as an effective social system for the procurement of intense experience, we can legitimately apply to it Whitehead's statement in «Immortality» that «the more effective social systems involve a large infusion of various soils of personalities as subordinate elements in their make - up — for example, an animal body, or a society of animals, such as human beings» (IMM 690).

For the animal it is the bare protection of the body; for a human being it has to be a suitable accommodation which would allow him to grow in every aspect - physical, mental and intellectual.

If, for example, our reflection on other animals takes place in the context of the conviction that Christ is in them and they are in Christ, that we and they are members one of the other, and that together we build up the body of Christ, it would no longer be possible to turn our backs upon their suffering with indifference.

Also human beings are made in the image and likeness of God, we can know and love, through the power of our spiritual soul - we are very different from animals, not in our physical bodies but in our souls.

It was the body which linked him with the animals; it was made of similar flesh and bone, and lived only for the limited period between birth and death, at which point the body fell into decay.

In 1555 an early French zoologist, called Belon, showed from the comparison of the skeletons of a bird and a man that there was such a remarkable similarity, that man carried about in his own body the proof of his connection with the animals.

«In order that primeval men, or the ape - like progenitors of man, should have become social,» Darwin reasoned, «they must have acquired the same instinctive feelings which impel other animals to live in a body.»

Any scientist on earth knows that the overwhelming body of evidence points towards h om os exu ality, hete ros exuality, and bis exu ality as normally occurring phenomenon within the spectrum of innate human (and hundreds of other animals) se x ual development.

To think of the self relationally is to think of its very existence as affected or constituted by the world external to the body, that is, by other humans, by plants and other animals, by the earth, and by the sky.

Note that the Dalai Lama does not say that we ought to respect animals because they are useful to us, or because they are concoctions of our egos, or because they are extensions of our bodies.

Yeah, axolotls and starfish and some other animals spontaneously regrow missing body parts - and they don't even pray (that I know of)!

Mays observes that the concept of causal efficacy concerns sense - reception, that process whereby an animal body receives and transmits forms of energy through itself.

But in the present situation, where the meat that comes to our table usually represents extended suffering on the part of the animal whose body we eat, we recognize that withdrawal of support from the whole system through vegetarianism is a fully appropriate, if not morally mandated, position.

In the history of a living society, its more vivid manifestations wander to whatever quarter is receiving from the animal body an enormous variety of physical experience.

The stream of conscious experience and synthetic activity is the dominant society of actual occasions in human (and animal) bodies, being influenced by subordinate organic processes in those bodies, then influencing them in turn in an ongoing dialectic of causality and creativity.

(An animal body, it is true, discloses a singular entity, but it is a collective one, a society of cells.)

Evidence of the fact that union differentiates is to be seen all round us — in the bodies of all higher forms of life, in which the cells become almost infinitely complicated according to the variety of tasks they have to perform; in animal associations, where the individual «polymerises» itself, one might say, according to the function it is called upon to fulfil; in human societies, where the growth of specialization becomes ever more intense; and in the field of personal relationships, where friends and lovers can only discover all that is in their minds and hearts by communicating them to one another.

But in the past fifty years, Christianity has been blamed, with some justification, for the Holocaust, for participating in colonial oppression, for arrogance in dealing with other communities of faith, for ecological destruction, for cruelty to animals, for oppression of women, for repression of the body and its sexuality, for suppressing the voices of minority groups and thus participating in their oppression, for the persecution of gays and Lesbians, and many other crimes.

This depends upon there being a brain, an arrangement of cells in a particular part of the body which by reason of its peculiar coordination makes the given routing able to «know» in a distinctively human manner — quite different from, although certainly continuous with, the sort of «knowing» that is possible for the higher grades of animal life.

If I ask you give me examples of substantial things, I suspect you will point to rocks and sticks, plants and animal bodies, perhaps also atoms and heavenly bodies.

The lesson of the transmutation of causal efficacy into presentational immediacy is that great ends are reached by life in the present; life novel and immediate, but deriving its richness by its full inheritance from the rightly organized animal body.

Nevertheless, we can say that at that point at which the surplus psychic energy became sufficient in quantity to enable the psychic life to become its own end rather than primarily a means to the survival and health of the body, the threshold was crossed dividing man from the animal.

@Bradleyford Animals do not have control of their bodies at the cellular level.

Religion is a paranoid fantasy that speaks to the animals terrified of the dark and being alone within one's body.

If our bodies were meant to be made purely for progeny, women would go into heat like others in the animal world... instead, we are blessed with bodies that are capable of giving, and recieving, pleasure.

In general it seems that we can be sure there are souls only where there are central nervous systems providing sufficient stimulus in some locus in an animal body for a unified experience to emerge far more complex than that of individual molecules or cells.

It is vicious to (knowingly or unknowingly) damage the gifts God has given us — gifts of land, animals, our bodies, and those of our families and neighbors.

It may be doubted, however, that such alms would embrace even the relevant aims of the cell to which the DNA molecules belong, let alone the aims of the total animal body.

In the society of a live animal body there are such occasions, together called an «entirely living nexus,» (PR 103) that may assume dominance over the body.

A more viable option may lie in the emergence of dynamic human societies more nearly analogous to animals possessing minds coordinating the activities of the body.

He speaks of animal bodies as corpuscular societies, whereas he speaks of molecules, quite directly, as enduring objects.