Sentences with phrase «of bonds costs»

We'll assume that $ 1,000,000 worth of bonds costs $ 1,000,000 (it could be slightly more or slightly less), with a rate of 2.70 %.

and so the proportion of your bond cost to be allocated to your A warrants, for instance, would be 46/159 or about 28.9 % using these example figures.

Essentially you are looking for a trusty tenant to pay as much of the bond costs as possible that you have in place.

Not exact matches

The third - party certification and disclosure processes for these bonds are not cost free and create an added level of bureaucracy that does not exist with regular bond issues.

It is possible there is enough of a demand for «green» debt investments that the province can sell this debt for a higher price than it would get for non-green bonds, thereby reducing their borrowing costs.

These policies help to protect against payments as the result of bodily injury or property damage, medical expenses, the cost of de1fending lawsuits, and settlement bonds or judgments required during an appeal procedure.

Under its current asset - buying and lending tool, the BOJ limits the duration of government bonds it buys to three years because it wants to push down the cost of borrowing for companies, many of whom work in three - year investment cycles.

Cut in compensation of about 10 % came in a year when the bank's profit nearly halved due to higher legal costs and a slump in bond trading.

The cost of insuring Turkish debt spiked to a 4-1/2 month high, while dollar bonds fell across the curve.

The move is a novel way for the San Mateo, Calif., company to finance the enormous cost of installing panels on thousands of roofs — a typical residential system costs $ 25,000 — while appealing to retail investors who are on the hunt for better rates of return than they can find in savings accounts and government bonds.

New bond investors would probably demand a higher return to compensate for the added costs of investing in bond funds.

Their profit margins are roughly measured by the difference between mortgage rates and the banks» own costs of borrowing, which is approximated by the Bank of Canada's five - year benchmark bond rate — about 1.2 %.

April 26 - U.S. stock index futures pointed to a strong open for the tech - heavy Nasdaq on Thursday as a slew of upbeat earnings from Facebook and Qualcomm helped set aside worries over rising U.S. bond yields and corporate costs.

While getting employees out of the office on their annual day of service can cost between $ 150,000 to $ 200,000, Williams is quick to point out, «The passion this creates and the bond it instills in a company makes it one of the best ROI decisions you could possibly make.»

Policies protect against payments as the result of bodily injury, property damage (including if the property is damaged off - premise), medical expenses, libel, slander, the cost of defending lawsuits, and settlement bonds or judgments required during an appeal procedure.

The fifteen minutes of fame that you can offer with a single post costs you nothing but tells that customer how important she is to you and cements your bond even stronger.

First, he believes that an investor in a low - cost S&P index fund who reinvests all dividends will do better — very likely substantially better — than an investor who buys a 17 - year government bond and reinvests all of his coupons in the same instrument.

Furthermore, the 1 percent you pay to your money manager doesn't always cover the costs of buying and selling the stocks and bonds in your portfolio or the sales charges (also known as loads) and administrative fees charged by the mutual funds your manager puts you into.

They have also increased the cost of new fixed - rate mortgages as yields on the bond market have moved higher.

«Apple of course has huge amounts of cash, but... the cost of borrowing now is so unbelievably low that issuing long - term bonds... is actually a very smart thing,» Schwarzman said on CNBC.

All it has to say is that its printing press will be used to unreservedly buy up sufficient quantities of the bonds of peripheral EU members to keep their borrowing costs down.

That would make REITs less attractive to investors relative to bonds, while raising the cost of their debts — cutting into profits.

Launched three years ago to fight off the threat of deflation, the ECB's 2.55 trillion euro ($ 3.14 trillion) bond purchase programme has kept borrowing costs low to induce spending and investment, all with the ultimate aim of generating inflation.

Volcker, capital requirements, etc., drive up the cost of immediacy, but they don't increase the risk of a crash, because bond dealers were never in the business of buying all the bonds all the way down.

BlackRock, for instance, has endlessly pushed electronic trading of bonds, but at most that would reduce the costs of immediacy by bringing buyers and sellers together more efficiently.

Thriftiness is a virtue because costs are one of the few things that investors can control in their portfolios, particularly when stocks and bonds...

Think of a bond fund like something of a perpetual dollar cost averaging vehicle.

Indeed, the big banks currently have a much lower cost of capital than their smaller brethren precisely because the bond market doesn't believe they will ever be allowed to fail.

The basic premise of ETFs is powerful: An efficient, low - cost way to invest in a broad, diversified set of stocks or bonds.

Only with bonds it's even harder to create a diversified portfolio using individual bonds on your own unless you (a) have a large amount of capital (typically bonds are sold in lots of $ 10,000 or $ 100,000) and (b) know how to trade bonds on the open market (transaction costs can be larger for bonds than stocks because of the spreads and lack of liquidity).

Yes, you have a maturity date with an individual bond, but this ignores the opportunity cost of investing at higher future rates in the meantime.

As you suggest, I follow a strong dollar cost average approach, but I feel bonds will not make up a portion of my portfolio until my 50s.

Rising housing prices raise the cost of living, while rising stock and bond prices increase the cost of buying a retirement income — leaving pension funds unable to make good on their promises.

Bond funds work great for diversification purposes and for gaining exposure to a wide variety of markets, geographies and strategies at a low cost.

To receive the full benefit of a bond ladder, one needs not only to stay the course for a number of years (so that lower yield and higher yield purchases benefit from cost averaging), but also with a relatively stable amount of capital.

«Near - term relief of government bond deals may come at the cost of making the banks» balance sheets more toxic.»

And investors have a wide field to choose from, whether it's through actively managed bond mutual funds or low - cost exchange - traded funds (ETF), or a combination of both.

The option / opportunity cost for dry powder (bonds vs. cash) is extremely cheap — with that said, it has been cheap for quite some time, and could stay cheap for much longer, BUT, one who exercises that option has left very little on the table, certainly nothing material in terms of financial security / wealth.

The rates that have responded most significantly to lower borrowing costs are short - term loans for financial speculation, above all for derivatives and related buying or selling of stocks and bonds on margin — enormous gambles on which way the dollar, the stock market and interest rates may go.

I asked Wade Pfau, associate professor at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, to calculate the long - run opportunity cost of bond investment versus equity investment.

Bondholders can still recoup their original costs if the value of the interest income the bond has generated is greater than the lost principal value.

ETFs are generally low cost and tax efficient, and they can serve as the core of your portfolio for both stocks and bonds.

All else equal, unless it possesses some sort of major offsetting advantage that makes the risk of non-payment low, a company with a low - interest coverage ratio will almost assuredly have bad bond ratings, increasing the cost of capital; e.g., its bonds will be classified as junk bonds rather than investment grade bonds.

The cost of insuring Vivendi bonds using credit - default swaps increased as much as 4 basis points, or 2 percent, to 203 basis points today, according to Bloomberg prices.

If the situation deteriorates for a given issue, history has shown there is often a window of time when it is not particularly painful to switch out to a practically identical bond, with much better interest coverage, for nominal costs.

In addition, cities, states, and taxpayers have concerns about the costs of bonds and borrowing, how to get the best return on banked or invested public money, and an interest in finding innovative ways to fund public spending without surrendering public control, as is often the case with public - private partnerships.

Long story short, with 2009 under my belt as a bounded tentpole of a worse case real world experiment, I envisage a 1 - year bonded income equivalent tranche of emergency funds backed by a 2 - yr income equivalent tranche dividend fund (Vanguard's low - cost dividend growth, for ex.).

It's better to watch financial conditions instead of the VIX, because they incorporate financial stress in equities, bonds, money markets along with cost of credit.

Over recent years, more and more plans are offering a suite of low - cost index funds covering domestic equities, foreign equities, U.S. taxable bonds, and cash.

What is to stop U.S. banks and their customers from creating $ 1 trillion, $ 10 trillion or even $ 50 trillion on their computer keyboards to buy up all the bonds and stocks in the world, along with all the land and other assets for sale, in the hope of making capital gains and pocketing the arbitrage spreads by debt leveraging at less than 1 % interest cost?