Sentences with phrase «of brief sentences»

Ambiguous language should be avoided in favor of brief sentences that convey pertinent information.

Wouldn't you be turned off if someone you didn't know turned in a report or emailed you with a couple of brief sentences, rife with misspellings?

And to his credit before things got heated, he admitted that he served a couple (yes, a couple) of brief sentences in jail for drug dealing.

or reflecting on how ideas were shared in conversation, or sitting alone and imagining the preaching event itself, as the sermon unrolls, list by words, phrases of brief sentences the ideas in the order of their occurrence.

Not exact matches

«The development brief for the Chiron can be summarized in one sentence and is probably the shortest in the history of the automobile: We want to make the best significantly better,» said Wolfgang Durheimer, president of Bugatti Automobiles S.A.S. «The Chiron will set new standards in every respect.

While strictly true, the title was taken from one brief phrase within a long sentence deep in the piece that was (ironically) juxtaposed to a brief phrase about the promotion of growth.

There are two points in that brief sentence, and the failure of the medieval Church to observe them or to reform its practice in conformity with them, is highly typical of the general failure to reform itself, with which Luther was so radically concerned.

No need to delve into every single detail when they may just want a brief couple of sentence definition.

A second, briefer but more striking example: Anglicans have been consistently most in favour of the death penalty, 61 % agreeing or agreeing strongly that «for some crimes, the death penalty is the most appropriate sentence» in 2012, down from 68 % in 2005.

As he did in the wake of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's sentencing, Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued a brief statement in response to the five year sentence handed down by a federal judge in the corruption case of ex-Majority Leader Dean Skelos.

After the 12 - year sentence, Bharara issued a brief response: «Today's stiff sentence is a just and fitting end to Sheldon Silver's long career of corruption.»

They should start with some brief BACKGROUND information: a sentence giving a broad introduction to the field comprehensible to the general reader, and then a sentence of more detailed background specific to your study.

There are brief biographical sketches — ranging from a couple of sentences to half a page — of well over 2000 notable figures in science, from Michael Ashburner to Zeno, the Greek philosopher famous for showing that in a race Achilles can never overtake the tortoise.

For the study, they examined 44,000 brief samples of text collected over 25 years from the Washington University Sentence Completion Test (WUSCT), a measure of the stages of ego development.

At the end of the article, please include a brief professional biography of the author (s), two or three sentences long and not more than 40 words, plus contact information.

Still, this brief court appearance enabled him to re-establish contact with Wuornos, which led to a series of interviews that depict nothing so much as a suicidal woman using a high - profile filmmaker to expedite her death sentence.

Here's another a helpful tip: Let's say you give a five - question multiple - choice quiz or a brief journal - like response of a few sentences.

(+ examples)- What punctuation works with them (+ examples)- Where can conjunctions be placed in a sentence (+ examples)- A brief recap of what was learned in the lesson

For each, there is a brief explanation of the use, followed by a sentence prompt to complete with a full sentence.

The title of Lesson / Description: One sentence is usually enough, but a well - crafted title on a lesson plan can explain a lesson well enough so that even a brief description is unnecessary.

• before getting down to writing try to concentrate and imagine the entire picture of your essay; • write down key words and make a plan; • think over some phrases that can convey your thoughts; • write down a rough copy of your essay; • proofread it several times and reimagine some parts; • think what can be omitted, added and at the same time what is needless (there are always some sentences that can be rephrased in briefer way).

A good paragraph should contain a topic sentence and a brief summary of the paragraph at its end.

By Debbie Burke A log line or logline is a brief (usually one - sentence) summary of a television program, film, or book that states the central conflict of the story, often providing both a synopsis of the story's plot, and an... Continue reading →

Typically, UK agents just want a brief covering letter, with title, word count, and genre, a short, straightforward description of your book (as in a couple of sentences), your contact info, and a description of your writing credits, if you have any.

It is essential for students to utilize clear and brief language so as to make the sentences of the essay flow smoothly.

Include a brief bio, just one or two sentences of your previous writing experience.

After a brief introduction of your essay topic, you need to write your point of view on the topic in one sentence.

A brief about the investment objective (in a single line sentence) followed by kind of producin which investor is investing (Equity / Debt).

Although this period of Judd's writing is notable for the categorical utterances housed within brief reviews that occasionally ran no more than five sentences long, it is also during -LSB-...]

Anecdotes as brief as a sentence to compressed essays of intimacy and eloquence are presented alongside a career - spanning selection of paintings, drawings, photographs and pastels.

I realize it's kind of late for making suggestions, but here goes anyway: Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.It looks like you have addressed T&G's main arguments (eg, about the 2nd law), but I wonder if it might be appropriate to put in a brief description of what it means to «falsify» something in the scientific sense — ie, essentially what T&G must show (and failed to show) to make their case that there is no greenhouse effect: namely, 1) experimental evidence that shows the opposite of what an atmospheric greenhouse effect would necessarily produce and / or 2) evidence that the greenhouse effect would actually violate some physical law (eg, 2nd law of thermo) The pot on the stove example is obviously an attempt to show that you get a colder temp with the water than without, but I think it's worthwhile explicitly stating that «because T&G failed to demonstrate that the pot on the stove example is a valid analogy for the earth, they failed to falsify the atmospheric greenhouse effect» And you could also add a sentence stating that «because T&G failed to show that the greenhouse effect would require a violation of the 2nd law [because their arguments were incorrect], they also failed to falsify»

GWPF BRIEFING PAPER No2 - SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SUBJECT Mueller explains what this Briefing Paper No2 is about in the first three seBRIEFING PAPER No2 - SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SUBJECT Mueller explains what this Briefing Paper No2 is about in the first three seBriefing Paper No2 is about in the first three sentences.

Unfortunately for those looking for evidence that the planet is about to cool off, the only support for this in the article is a single sentence: «This may offer a brief respite from the persistent rise of global temperatures, but in the coupled system we describe, there are compensating effects.»

What are such briefings for: to get a first - hand impression of current thinking of scientists, or for scientists to read out sentences from their papers?

Second, you ask exactly the right question when you write, «What are such briefings for: to get a first - hand impression of current thinking of scientists, or for scientists to read out sentences from their papers?»

Young Legal Aid Lawyers co-chairs Oliver Carter and Rachel Francis presented an introduction to YLAL and a brief history of legal aid, from the Poor Prisoners Defence Act 1903, which introduced criminal legal aid for defendants in the higher criminal courts, to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 («LASPO»), which wholly or partially removed a number of areas of law from the scope of legal aid.

Consider this sentence, which sports four avoidable ofs: «The lawyer of the company filed the brief of the company with the office of the clerk of the district court» (21 words).

By articulating reasons, even if brief, the sentencing judge not only assures reviewing courts (and the public) that the sentencing process is a reasoned process but also helps that process evolve... [H] is reasoned sentencing judgment... can provide relevant information to both the court of appeals and ultimately the Sentencing Csentencing judge not only assures reviewing courts (and the public) that the sentencing process is a reasoned process but also helps that process evolve... [H] is reasoned sentencing judgment... can provide relevant information to both the court of appeals and ultimately the Sentencing Csentencing process is a reasoned process but also helps that process evolve... [H] is reasoned sentencing judgment... can provide relevant information to both the court of appeals and ultimately the Sentencing Csentencing judgment... can provide relevant information to both the court of appeals and ultimately the Sentencing CSentencing Commission.

Because this phrasing sounded strangely familiar, I went back to the amicus brief I primarily authored and found this sentence describing my vision of post-Booker sentencing realities:

In brief, Congress could make it financially impossible to handle appeals of death sentences for states, while providing funds for the defendants sentenced to death.

Give a very brief summary of what you are asking for and what your case is about (a couple of sentences).

Beyond the attempted extortion of University of Louisville men's basketball coach Rick Pitino, which led to a seven - year sentence for Sypher, the case provides the LBW practice tip of the day: When briefing a legal issue in federal court, do not simply copy your statement of the law from a page on Wikipedia.

Even when I was practicing law, I was better off getting out a spoken version with dictation first on a brief or whatever I was writing because I could get the thoughts out of my head as opposed to sitting there starring at the screen saying all right what's my first sentence.

This post's sentences were easy to read and provided a clear, reader - friendly brief of the case.

But will using one space after a sentence - ending period raise the ire of the judge who notices it in a brief (you can convince those you work for or with by pointing out Butterick's authorities)?

With regard to any nuances of guideline - centrism — including discussions of guideline filtering to which the Court referred in apparent homage to your brief — I think the principal point of the opinion controls: that the district court operates under no presumption that the guideline sentence satisifies 3553 (a).

First, as noted before here, the SG brief completely ducks the question of whether, if Blakely applies to the federal guidelines, the guidelines can and should still apply in federal sentencing cases that do not raise any «Blakely factors.»

That quote will cover off all court appearances from first appearance to the trial or sentencing; it covers all letters and communications with you, the Crown, experts; it covers all communications with parties including witness preparation, and trial preparation; it covers the drafting of legal applications and arguments and the time spent researching relevant case law; it also covers all costs associated with the presenting your case in a brief to the Crown as part of the plea bargaining process and / or the costs associated with a trial if the matter proceeds that way.

On page 67 of the SG's brief, the government seems not only to concede, but also to contend, that the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (SRA) is severable.

After many brief - related posts on the applicability of Blakely to the federal sentencing guidelines (see, e.g., posts here and here and here; see also Hammoud post here), this weekend I am starting to focus on the Booker and Fanfan briefs» approach to the even tougher issue of severability.