Although scientific evidence increasingly shows that fossil fuel consumption has caused the climate to change rapidly, the issue has grown so politicized that skepticism
of the broad scientific consensus has seeped into classrooms.
Not exact matches
This is a familiar dodge - emphasizing uncertainty about the precise amount
of humanity's contribution while ignoring the
broad scientific consensus that human activities are largely responsible for dangerous warming
of our planet and that action is urgently needed before it is too late.
First, a caveat: without getting bogged down in the
scientific status
of the theory
of evolution, we should note that among scientists there is a
consensus on the
broad lines
of the theory
of evolution.
His favorable reference to «State
of Fear» is a dead giveaway, as is his
broad - brush scathing dismissal
of the
scientific consensus on human - caused climate disruption.
There is a
broad scientific consensus that human activity — including the burning
of fossil fuels for transportation, heating and industrial manufacturing — is driving recent climate change.
His favorable reference to «State
of Fear» is a dead giveaway, as is his
broad - brush scathing dismissal
of the
scientific consensus on human - caused climate disruption.
There is
broad scientific consensus on the reality
of anthropogenic climate change but there still a huge amount
of ongoing research into many
of the details.
Even if, for argument's sake, there were to emerge a
broad consensus that the impacts
of SRM could be accurately predicted (which seems highly unlikely and endlessly contestable), the social and political impacts
of such an intervention are essentially un-knowable, meaning that whatever level
of physical
scientific certainty or engineering know - how we might gain in this area, the whole enterprise will remain radically unpredictable and risky.
Lets abandon the
scientific consensus seeking approach in favor
of open debate and discussion
of a
broad range
of policy options that stimulate local and regional solutions to the multifaceted and interrelated issues surrounding climate change.
These uncertainties are exploited by those — such as Myron Ebell, head
of Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency transition team — who reject the
broad scientific consensus that humans are warming the Earth.
That sounds pretty progressive, and is certainly greener than the position
of EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, who has explicitly denied the «
broad scientific and policy
consensus» on climate change.
He will also look at the
broader issue
of scientific consensus and why it generates such intense opposition.
The drawback
of this approach is that uncertainty and minority interpretations are so much in the spotlight that we may forget the items that actually do enjoy
broad scientific consensus.
After all, the «
broad scientific consensus» could still be wrong, precisely because
of the high level
of «uncertainty» (even if there has been no «gaming
of the system»).
Plus, most professional American
scientific organizations, including the U.S. National Academy
of Sciences, the American Meteorological Society and the American Association for the Advancement
of Science, acknowledge that there is a
broad scientific consensus on climate change.
There once existed a
broad consensus that the Church must be the ultimate judge
of scientific truths.
The new target: Naomi Oreskes who last week found her research used as a foil by some lawmakers in the U.S. House
of Representatives to try and discredit the widely - accepted and growing view that there is a
broad scientific consensus on the evidence
of human - caused global warming caused by rising carbon dioxide emissions.
In a statement, Mr. Boehlert, who is retiring at the end
of the year, expressed satisfaction with the results, saying, «There is nothing in this report that should raise any doubts about the
broad scientific consensus on global climate change — which doesn't rest primarily on these temperature issues, in any event — or any doubts about whether any paper on the temperature records was legitimate
scientific work.»
There is a very
broad scientific consensus on the issue
of man - made global warming that is arrived at through evidence from a wide range
of research spanning the past century and more.
A strategy used by climate policy proponents to counter the strategies
of the merchants
of doubt (Oreskes and Conway, 2010; Schneider and Flannery, 2009) has been the establishment
of a
broad international
scientific consensus with high confidence levels, strong appeals to the authority
of the
consensus relative to opposing viewpoints, and exposure
of the motives
of skeptics.
One
of our main quibbles with the way the climate change debate is presented is precisely that the IPCC «
consensus» belies a
broad range
of nuanced positions and arguments — both
scientific and political — as does the so - called sceptic camp.
The «global cooling» myth is another favorite
of climate deniers, despite
broad scientific consensus that the planet is in fact warming.
Moreover, a
broader scientific consensus may make a stronger impression by showing how science works in terms
of finding the most credible explanation.
Toyota Motor Corp.'s North American President Jim Press, whose company has pushed fuel - efficient hybrid vehicles, noted that Toyota «has long been mindful
of and accepts the
broad scientific consensus that climate change is occurring and will continue unless there are significant and coordinated global efforts to slow the growth
of man - made greenhouse gas emissions.»