Sentences with phrase «of certain opinion»

Not exact matches

Ingratiation is defined as the use of certain positive behaviors such as flattery, doing favors or conforming to another's opinions to get someone else to like you.

«We appear to be seeing a coalescing of opinion by international regulators on the securities implications for certain digital token issuers and the intermediaries for token offerings.

One opinion out there says that content of a certain age doesn't matter, that Google (and Panda) knows that older content is often ignored by readers and is more or less irrelevant.

The opinion, issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, strikes down a legislative provision, first enacted in 1986 and renewed numerous times since, which sets a goal that 5 percent of federal defense contracting dollars each fiscal year must be awarded to certain entities, including small disadvantaged companies.

Ann Handley: «Influencer marketing describes the process of tapping into «influencers» — people who have large followings in certain niches and can affect opinion — to increase the visibility of your own products or services.

Not sure why certain individuals are getting upset at the viewpoint of the author, at the end of the day it is just that, the opinions of a stranger so why let it bother you.

It is a condition to the distribution that HP Co. receive (i) a private letter ruling from the IRS and / or one or more opinions from its external tax advisors, in each case, satisfactory to HP Co.'s board of directors, regarding certain U.S. federal income tax matters relating to the separation and related transactions, and (ii) an opinion of each of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, satisfactory to HP Co.'s board of directors, regarding the qualification of the distribution, together with certain related transactions,

The separation is subject to certain conditions, including, among others, obtaining final approval from HP Co.'s board of directors, receipt of a private letter ruling from the IRS and one or more opinions with respect to certain U.S. federal income tax matters relating to the separation and the SEC declaring the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this information statement forms a part.

Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by HP Co. of the IRS private letter ruling and the tax opinions referred to above, the IRS could assert that the distribution and / or certain related transactions do not qualify for tax - free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by HP Co. of the IRS private letter ruling and the tax opinions referred to above, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the distribution and / or certain related transactions do not qualify for tax - free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge.

It is a condition to the distribution that HP Co. receive (i) a private letter ruling from the IRS and / or one or more opinions from its external tax advisors, in each case, satisfactory to HP Co.'s board of directors, regarding certain U.S. federal income tax matters relating to the separation and related transactions, and (ii) an opinion of each of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, satisfactory to HP Co.'s board of directors, regarding the qualification of the distribution, together with certain related transactions, as a transaction that is generally tax - free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Sections 355 and 368 (a)(1)(D) of the Code.

Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt of the IRS private letter ruling and / or opinions of counsel or other external tax advisors, the IRS could determine that the distribution and certain related transactions should be treated as taxable transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes if it determines that any of the facts, assumptions, representations, statements or undertakings that were included in the request for the IRS private letter ruling or on which any opinion was based are false or have been violated.

The separation is subject to certain conditions, including, among others, obtaining final approval from Parent's board of directors, receipt of a private letter ruling from the IRS and one or more opinions with respect to certain U.S. federal income tax matters relating to the separation and the SEC declaring the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this information statement forms a part.

Under the tax indemnity and sharing agreement, we will have the ability to engage in certain otherwise prohibited transactions, such as additional stock issuances or stock repurchases during the restricted period, provided we first deliver to EHI a tax opinion acceptable to EHI that doing so will not adversely affect the tax - free treatment of the separation.

Any opinions of outside counsel or other external tax advisors and any IRS private letter ruling will be based, among other things, on various facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of HP Co. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (including those relating to the past and future conduct of HP Co. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise).

Any opinions of outside counsel or any other external tax advisor and any IRS private letter ruling will be based, among other things, on various facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of HP Co. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (including those relating to the past and future conduct of HP Co. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise).

Users who have attained a certain rating can be - come Arbiters to participate in disputes, and also participate in the platform's development by conveying the opinions of the masses.

Delivering a legal opinion requires a certain level of work by company counsel, which increases legal fees.

In addition to «flat - fee - only» and «fee - offset» models, the SunAmerica Advisory Opinion provides that asset allocation services offered to participants (involving advice and even discretionary management) that are the product of a computer model developed and overseen by an independent financial expert, and subject to certain additional conditions, would allow a service provider (the broker - dealer, in this case) to avoid PTs when receiving variable / indirect compensation from its platform of investment offerings.

He becomes «competent» in certain areas and, though he doesn't mention this much, leverages the opinion of key people he knows in each area.

The spinoff will remain subject to certain other conditions, including the receipt of a legal opinion on the tax - free treatment of the deal under U.S. federal tax laws, Yahoo said in a regulatory filing.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases about religion, but the judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious beliefs and practices.

While that opinion may be supported by a literal reading of certain portions of the ancient writings which are revered as scripture, I find that attitude to be both deplorable and shortsighted.

The evil I want to inflict on the other (who is bad, either because of his personal qualities or because he belongs to a certain race, class, or nation or holds certain opinions)-- is the evil I inflict justified by the evil he has done?

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation — We hold these truths to be self - evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Whatever you «identify» or don't «identify» with, does not mean that people form a certain view or opinion of yourself, or the facts, as they are.

I am so inclined due to Tocqueville's teaching on common opinion, and in the light of certain 20th - century articulations of Christianity found in theologically liberal Protestant denominations or Catholic factions.

You know that God's Word is of the utmost importance, and by it we know of Him and know His opinions on certain matters, not least being the nature of humanity.

This, however, does not mean that there can not be serious differences of theologi - cal opinion within the Church, nor that a Christian could never refuse to obey a certain particular order of a minister of the Church because his conscience considers it as incompatible with justice or charity, despite the minister's good faith.

Not to mention most people who beleive in a certain religion shove their opinions down the throats of others, i've seen it time and time again.

Heck, for me to dare question the bible or parts of it or to question certain areas in many denominations or mainstream teachings is bad enough let alone my honesty and forthright opinions when asked or cornered, or told to believe something that I flat - out refuse to.

Note the following quotations from Hartshorne's various writings from 1952 through 1984: God is that one in whom prehensions are «wholly concrete... without eliminations of any kind» (ReM 7:109); «what we once were to God, less than that we can never be» (JR 32:101; also LP 252);»... if we can never be less than we have been to God, we can in reality never be less than we have been... That there can be no subtraction is, in my opinion, more certain than that there can be no addition» (JR 32:102, LP 253); «What in us is extremely partial, feeble retention of the past may in God be complete, ideally vivid and adequate retention» (OOTM 34).

It also served to show me that I will anger almost every Whovian for leaving out a lot of what they deem as «vital» for a primer (I'm sorry but in my humble opinion, a thorough knowledge of the Rani and the Valeyard isn't required to begin) or for recommending a certain path to beginning.

A matter so strenuously debated is not to be settled by a few casual comments; yet certain facts and agreed opinions have in the heat of controversy received less than their proper attention.

It is not enough for him that somebody has a certain opinion, or performs a certain rite, which might be produced also without freedom by means of training, brainwashing, social pressures and so forth.

(Sure, there are individual opinions about certain matters, but there are individual opinions about the alien heritage of the British monarchy.)

His view is that Paul basically gave himself free reign here at the start of his teachings to the gentiles (see also 1:1 a: «Paulos, apostolos ouk ap anthroopoon, oude di anthroopon, alla dia Iesou Christou, kia Theou patros...») and then started preaching his own theology heavily influenced by his own biases and preferences — not that any of the writers were ever completely exempt from it of course, but still the writer felt Paul was quite fundamentalistic at times about certain things he had some clear opinions about, e.g. about relationships and women's position in the church etc, which he then propagated as part of the gospel.

We also commonly speak of someone being an authority on a certain subject, meaning that he or she is recognized as an accepted source of expert opinion in that area.

It involves, not belief in the sense of personal opinions, but rather a set of actions (saying certain things, going to services, doing good works, etc.) that can be done in the absence of belief — indeed the nature of a wager makes it such that you fully admit you don't know, which is actually an agnostic atti.tude toward the idea of God's existence.

For the faithful can not embrace that opinion which maintains that either after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parent of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents.

To a certain extent, much of what Hart has to say is captured in his opinions on art.

There were then and have been until the present differences of opinion as to identification by documents of certain passages, sentences, phrases, and even words; and the precise lines of the hypothesis are still with some scholars a point of energetic debate.

In the Old Testament, however, the actual practice of worshiping ancestors had been so far overpassed that while one first rate scholar says, «There is a growing consensus of opinion that the Hebrews, like all other peoples at a certain stage of thought, worshipped these spirits,» (Henry Preserved Smith: The Religion of Israel, p. 25) another first - rate scholar says, «The alleged indications of Ancestor Worship are all exposed to more or less serious objections.»

The New York Times (which although not an «official» Jewish publication certainly reflects and indeed influences a certain type of American Jewish opinion) editorially branded the Vatican statement a whitewash, a rationalization of the conduct of the Church during the Holocaust.

And when reason, which works with equal truth, whether she be in the circle of the diverse or of the same — in voiceless silence holding her onward course in the sphere of the self - moved — when reason, I say, is hovering around the sensible world and when the circle of the diverse also moving tnily imparts the intimations of sense to the whole soul, then arise opinions and beliefs sure and certain.

He was a reminder that while everyone is certainly entitled to their opinion, voicing that opinion requires a certain amount of thought, kindness and humility.

We must exist forever, and if we didn't follow some certain set of beliefs in this life (which there are thousands of opinions on exactly what that should be), we'll be tortured in the flames forever and ever.

Although ghetto and other poor people are being served by many centers (one condition is that they must give help to anyone within a certain geographic area), minority groups in particular have often viewed such services as being offered by an alien «university whitey» who, in their opinion, fails to consult them about the kinds of services they need.

Pick any person, religious or not, and you can be about 99 % certain that person's opinion of how Jesus would feel about the healthcare debate matches their own.