Sentences with phrase «of chances on goal»

As we have seen on the game with lesister a lot of balls not precise and being given away cheaply, we created a lot of chances on the goal and most of them being missed because they were not a killer and on target, but the opponents team gets few chances and converted to goal most of them.

Not exact matches

To counter these things, your chances of hitting a specific goal increase greatly if you're getting frequent feedback that will keep you on track and help you to adjust accordingly.

If it can follow through on its goal to break down the barrier between live and on - demand TV, though, it has a chance of legitimately appealing to cord cutters.

And, of course, if you're on an «all or nothing» crowdfunding website, you have a bigger chance of not reaching your goal and therefore losing all the funding you do attract.

Cruz and Kasich are both incapable of securing the GOP nomination on the first ballot from a mathematical perspective, and so their collaboration is aimed at blocking Trump from reaching 1,237 delegates — a goal they must attain if they hope to stand a chance at a contested convention.

Perhaps a good place to start is by focusing on 10 students in your local high school, with the goal of increasing their chances of graduating.

This powerful calculator showed that I have a 78 % chance of meeting my goal of $ 40,000 per year in retirement based on my current savings, spending habits, and projects retirement contributions.

Despite missing the mark on your figures, other calculators and tools such as Personal Capital and Financial Engines give me a «very likely» chance of hitting my goal retirement date and income.

Diversifying your retirement assets among a variety of vehicles — both through insurance products and investments, depending on what is appropriate for your situation — may offer you the best chance of meeting your retirement income goals throughout your lifespan.

referring decisions also go in our favour, for instance that dortmund goal sanogo scored was clearly offside, these things are apart of football, GREAT teams overcome these obstacles, GREAT teams do not crumble with 3 or 4 goal leads, GREAT teams do not concede 3 + goals in 40 mins REGULARLY, GREAT teams average more than one tackle every 90 mins, GREAT teams don't need more 7 clear cut chances to score, united have academy players in defence, in fact our defensive players are 15x better but VAN GAAL will get a result, united have had an injury list just as long if not longer than ours but VAN GAAL will get a result, united have just gone through a managerial shift but VAN GAAL will get a result, so why on earth are united in the title race and not arsenal?

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

So all you need to do to have a chance of winning this superb stocking filler is to predict the correct score of the game against QPR on Boxing day, the time of the first goal by any player from either side and the first player to score a goal for the Gunners.

Top managers in modern football don't gamble and rely on other teams mistakes, they make sure they have every chance of reaching their goal by building an unstoppable squad even if it costs an extra 60m.

Somentimes I feel the likes of Ozil tend to overplay and look for the perfect goal, while I think that they should be more intent on getting the ball to the Frenchman and giving him chances to do his thing.

The fact that arsenal had 74 % possession but only 8 shots on goal illustrates part of the problem that we currently have, creating real chances.

This is exactly the type of versatile player that Arsenal need right now, as he can play as a winger or a striker, and anyone who can score 8 La Liga goals in 10 games (while not playing for Madrid or Barcelona) is definitely worth taking a chance on, especially for a price that works out at just over 14m GBP without any haggling.

Sanogo may be fortunate in his arsenal stay, because of injury, no team will be looking to take on an injured player (only arsenal), which may be a blessing in disguise, because his recovery more than likely will be after the window closes, so if i was him i would try get some goals in the under 23 games and hopeful that will get him into the cup games or even the chance at the Giroud role again.

The Gunners are now withing touching distance of Man City and just one result could see us overtake them at the top, which is why Wenger and his comments on the Arsenal website sounded thankful to our local rivals for giving Arsenal the chance to close that gap to the leaders and why he feels the late goal against Burnley was so vital.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

then Get a strong CDM that can tackle, Intercept, BLock, Clearence on ball, Pass, Create chances, Win Ariel duel and Score goals in the mould of Fabinho....

Grizman is on 4 goals and he has a better chance of adding to his tally than OG.

Sanchez has been more of the creative player with eyes for goal, Ozil on the other hand needs his Santi since he's not interested in scoring, rather he prefers creating the chances.

To simply blame our attack on our defeat to Manchester United would be a bit rich considering the errors which saw us trailing by two goals inside 11 minutes, and West Ham also had chances gifted to them which could easily have seen us lose that match, and I personally find it rich that the underperforming defender is blaming other areas of the team for their displays.

If it wasn't for that moment of madness from Mustafi it could easily have been equal at half time, and the goal was actually City's only shot on target before the break although De Bruyne and Aguero had pretty clear chances go astray.

although Ozil wears number 11, he plays a number 10 role and for me a number 10 is not only a creator of chances but a finisher of chances, Ozil is not a goal threat in any major way, he gets himself in lovely positions but refuse to shoot or take on the one defender in his path.

Unfortunately the City players wasted a number of great chances both before and after their only goal and that allowed Chelsea to first get back on level terms after De Bruyne had missed an open goal from a few yards out, and then to punich them further with a second and a late third.

He was a major outlet for Ozil and Cazorla especially... if he wasn't at the end of those chances, his diagonal runs to the left side of the pitch was creating space for others and Sanchez to come in on goal.

In all honesty Arsenal played well we had very good position with loads of chances and 13 corner kicks how come we are so crappy at scoring corners???? We need to start scoring the chances we get from corners we could have easily beat southhampton by 4 goals but forster was good he got the 3 points off us MR wenger should go back to the drawing board as he has some options one of witch could the calling of welington silva or a reshuffle bring iwobi in elneny or new methods in tactics as in picking players and rehearse attacks strategy As for the referee I to felt done by him there was on particular foul on sanches that was not giving at the end we need to register our efforts and be clinical

Our football is so much nicer to watch, but think it's a probably about right at the end of the first half, as far as chances on goal go.

Given another chance following his interception, Aikman, on third - and - goal, lofted a pass to Bjornson in the back right corner of the end zone.

Sakho is expected to get chances on set pieces, but the scorer of Liverpool's first half goal was an unlikely one: Joe Allen.

On top of that, the goal Mason scored was «scrappy» and the type of goal we wouldn't have scored in years past — look at Niki Jackson's opportunity in the second half where the poor dude dribbled a good chance away as a prime example of what we used to do — but a savvy player with a nose for goal, Mason, puts it away.

I liked how on one of his goals, even though it was an easy chance, how he made sure the ball went between the two players nearest him.

Even when United went down to ten men, following the dismissal of Marouane Fellaini for this stamp on McShane, Hull couldn't even find the goal that would have at least given them a chance of remaining in the top flight.

Only time will tell if this means that we will finish on top of the table come May, but if we have the best goal difference, the chances are pretty good.

Giroud is just not that type of winner in fact he didn't even get his chances on goal, no save forced.

As we thought would happen after his goal scoring Premier League starting debut against Swnasea at the weekend, Joel Campbell gets the chance on the right side of our front three once more, with Olivier Giroud leading the line and Alexis Sanchez on the left.

Wolcott lots of fans say he was on fire with Opportunity goals not creating chance for other.

Looking closely we do not really give up too many clear cut chances (Man Utd have 0 shots on goal out of total 7 shots in the first half), and we have been top of the league in number of shot on goal conceded.

At least you 2 know who I'm talking about 3 points what you got to say about that nothing cause we got the maximum points we can and we played quite well if you do watch football you should know every team with a 1 goal lead will be on the back foot to try see out the game especially wen we had plenty of chances to finish them off COYG

Chances were forthcoming, as a poor touch for Wijnaldum allowed West Ham to get back and clear when he was through on goal, and Moussa Sissoko could of added a third but fluffed his finish.

People will then be excited about the beginning of the following season thinking we going to pick up from where we left off, then on the 3rd game we will realise that nothing has changed.We will still have Wenger as our manager, mediocre players, shambolic defence, a striker that scores 1 of the 5 chances he gets, no DM, BFG as vice captain, Arteta leading the team as our DM, Sczerny in goal and a medical room filled with half our squad.

Lewandowski over benzema every day of the week offer 45 mill and go from there this guy would score 25 - 30 goals with the amount of chances that would be created for him he could fire us to prem league tittle add a dm to compete with coq and we have a squad to challenge on all fronts come on wenger break the bank for this guy and the proper glory days will return!

Coquelin was only stopped from scoring his first Gunners goal by the post in the first half and there were a few more chances scattered through the match, especially as we pushed for a late equaliser, but our control of the ball did not lead to enough real chances on a frustrating night.

Thirdly, please acknowledge the fact that he spent 3 1/2 MONTHS on the sidelines last year, and he managed one goal off your supposed maximum goal - scoring evaluation of his capabilities this season, despite him converting an extremely difficult chance yesterday.

I anticipate greatly the continuance of platitudes and adulation for Lord Theo — and even more so for the endless Theo for Centre - Forward, Theo should be playing down the middle, Theo is our best chance of goals if he plays as striker and so on.....

The report shows on a graph the difference between the conversion rates of our five main goal threats Giroid, Alexis, Ramsey, Ozil and Walcott compared to their expected goal rate, worked out by the likelihood of all of their chances resulting in a goal.

It was hardly the sort of thing to increase the pressure on our London rivals Chelsea who sit one place above us in the league table and for some time it looked as though the Blues would stroll to victory themselves, but despite and early goal and plenty more chances, they allowed West Ham to gain a foothold and then claim a point through a Javier Hernandez strike.

As you'd expect, City dominated the play (attempting 262 passes to United's 183) and created plenty of chances (15 attempts, six on target, of which five went in), but it's interesting to note that United also created more after Evans had been dismissed (seven shots, two on target, including Fletcher's goal).

I think the crowd noise at the Emirates is largely reflective of what we see on the pitch; you rarely see an Arsenal side at home dominate from start to finish, plenty of chances, plenty of goals.