Sentences with phrase «of change of temperature»

This rate of change of temperature with height (or altitude) is called the «environmental lapse rate».

... to say that the current rate of change of temperature did not occur in the past 11,000 years is in fact correct!

Dines, L H G, 1928 An analysis of the changes of temperature with height in the stratosphere over the British Isles, Memoirs of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2, (18), 137 - 151 Douglas, C.K.M., 1920.

1 is really saying is that the rate of change of the temperature depends on 1) how much water has to be heated by the incoming radiation (Cp), 2) what the forcing is, and 3) how the climate system responds to the forcing in terms of sending more or less radiation back into space.

For an analysis of how well the climate models do at computing the rate of change of temperature by latitude for the period from 1970 to 2001 see Polar versus Equatorial Warming.

Sure, combining all these is helpful and gives a picture of the past, but to say that the current rate of change of temperature did not occur in the past 11,000 years is laughable.

Do you deny that increasing the mass, by coupling to sub-surface material by conduction, or a (transparent) atmosphere by convection, would reduce the rate of change of temperature, both during the cooling phase, and in the warming phase when the illumination is switched on again?

«The climate has always changed and it always will — there is nothing unusual about the modern magnitudes or rates of change of temperature, of ice volume, of sea level or of extreme weather events,» Mr Carter added.

As near as I can make out, the rate of change of temperature with height is something between 0.5 to 1.0 Celsius per 100 meters, depending on whether the air is saturated or not and what the current temperature is; so let's call it 0.8 C / 100m for kicks.

You chose to use the rate of change of temperature to do your correlations.

Dr. Spencer's whole point seems to be about the rate of change of temperatures, and as discussed many times, the big event, or the big «shift» in that rate of change began during the «climate shift» of 76 - 77, of which much has been written, and not much resolved.

I reviewed Mann's method, and found that the statistical bias he applied was for temperatures proportional to the time rate of change of temperatures, which defines an exponential function of temperature independent of the initial data.