In the early going, my own lizard brain resisted with a couple
of clever arguments (noted in this blog post) to Seth's exhortation, which will come as no surprise to him.
Not exact matches
But, by the test
of the special thread, Jean Porter's sophisticated historical
argument in Natural and Divine Law resembles the
clever machinations
of modern counterfeiters.
The medieval poltergeist is virtually harmless in comparison with this adversary, who, armed with fire and sword, spiritual temptations and
clever arguments, has now risen up against God to prevent the preaching
of the gospel.
«I think people thought that if by chance the two cardinals were provably equal, the proof would maybe be surprising, but it would be some short,
clever argument that doesn't involve building any real machinery,» said Justin Moore, a mathematician at Cornell University who has published a brief overview
of Malliaris and Shelah's proof.
Yes, people * did * lose weight and the logic
of Atkins»
argument sounded
clever, but the science later showed that high fat / low carb diets were horrible for triglycerides, lipoproteins (the really bad cholsterol that inflammes arteries) and overall cardiovascular health.
In this elegant
argument for oversight, the use
of «enhanced persons» as a PC euphemism for mutants or human lab experiments is particularly
clever.
The most frustrating thing about Diane Ravitch's new book, Reign
of Error, isn't the way she twists the evidence on school choice or testing, or her condescending tone toward leaders trying to improve educational outcomes, or her
clever but disingenuous rhetorical
arguments.
Of course, there is also the
argument that this is just a
clever photoshop.
The art
of persuasion is
of course necessary to winning any
argument, but make sure you have real, physical, incontrovertible evidence on your side, not just
clever words.
I have a history with Andy Revkin's DotEarth, which is prone to provide fuel for sloppy thinking about weather and climate, as well as a hangout for the worst kind
of clever - looking phony skeptic
arguments.
It is not
clever to reject all
arguments of your opponent by an emotional appeal regarding his intentions.
It seems to me the guys I used to interact with at judithcurry.com, well, the brighter ones appreciate a
clever argument, and some
of them even have their own elaborate theories, though they don't compare or criticize each other's theories - it is enough that any one
of them «disproves» CAGW - but these theories don't have to stand up to the next group
of junior scientists who, to get beyond their current low paid adjunct position must prove something unexpected.
Given that Plimer doesn't seem to know what a valid or a sound
argument is, or what facts are, and too many
of the typical audience don't seem to know either, you can only expect to win these types
of encounters by being quick on your feet and
cleverer in finding ways to humiliate him.
Your
clever and ingenious semantic
arguments are logically flawed and require amazing leaps
of faith to accept, but you claim your critics are the ones being semantic!
It's a truism that societal changes, science, and
clever lawyers finding good
arguments in different fields, jurisdictions, or legal systems, can influence the evolution and application
of legal concepts.
On the face
of it, having a vulnerable network is not covered by such whistle - blower protections, although you never know how the courts will react to a
clever argument.