Sentences with phrase «of cognitive thinking»

A. Consistently integrates the use of cognitive thinking skills such as critical thinking, problem - solving, divergent thinking, inquiry, and decision - making into instruction.

A. Instructs students in the use of cognitive thinking skills such as critical thinking, problem - solving, divergent thinking, inquiry, and decision — making.

I used Bloom's Taxonomy of questions which ranges from lower to higher levels of cognitive thinking.

Not exact matches

Cognitive bias are misleading quirks of thought — mental tendencies that are part of human nature.

For several hours each day, unbeknownst to those employees, the researchers raised and lowered the amount of carbon dioxide in the air, and then tested everyone on nine different kinds of cognitive ability, like responding to a crisis, strategic thinking and applying their knowledge to a practical task.

«I think [ADP has] always had a bit of cognitive dissonance about Zenefits.

«We think this may be due to the fact that it takes a lot of cognitive energy to lie,» Van Swol says.

«We're starting to see the effects of technology automating cognitive work — things we used to think only people could do,» Schatsky says.

He or she takes the Watson - Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, a popular and well - validated cognitive - ability test, and the Devine Inventory, which measures the applicant's traits and tendencies against those of existing Capital H consultants.

Try a few sample questions from the Watson - Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, a highly regarded test of cognitive ability.

«Everything you think is influenced by years of experience and cultural upbringing,» says Art Markman, a cognitive psychologist at University of Texas at Austin and author of Smart Thinking (Perigee Trade, 2012).

Although you can access gamma brain waves during periods of extremely high functioning, it's the beta waves that scientists associate with everyday alertness, critical thinking, socialization, learning and cognitive processing.

I think of culture as a collective set of cognitive and emotional algorithms or «routines» that our brains access automatically.

The constant change of scenery makes it harder to think, because «the detection of changes in the visual stimulation results in distraction of cognitive processing,» according to the journal NeuroReport.

To win in the age of cognitive computing and cybersecurity, IBM is betting big on design thinking.

«What your memory is really for is giving you information about what to expect in the world and how to solve problems in those situations,» says Art Markman, a cognitive psychologist and author of Smart Thinking (Perigee Trade, 2012).

Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory.

These biases can be cognitive, illustrated by a tendency to think and act in a certain way or follow a rule of thumb.

MADISON, Wis. (AP)-- A Republican Senate candidate in Wisconsin said Wednesday that he questions the «cognitive thought process» of military veterans who decide to be Democrats.

And whereas some psychologists find that high scores on certain cognitive tests correlate in older people with the ability to keep their spirits up, other researchers hypothesize that happiness in later life is an effect of cognitive losses — which force older people to concentrate on simpler, happier thoughts.

Studies of napping have shown improvement in cognitive function, creative thinking and memory performance.

Cognitive biases cause investors to make poor decisions because of objective errors in their thinking or reasoning process.

It is true that people often believe things for bad reasons — self - deception, wishful thinking, and a wide variety of other cognitive biases really do cloud our thinking — but bad reasons only tend to work when they are unrecognized.

And when you use those thinking and analyzing abilities and they tell you Christianity is but a false cult — well, that can obviously create some cognitive dissonance even with people of faith.

Novak is a disruptive factor in the comfortable cognitive worlds of Catholic, and much Protestant, thought about politics, culture, and economics.

The Enlightenment belief that logical thinking and education alone, without any consideration of other factors apart from ignorance such as the survival instinct and clinical cognitive dysfunction in the formation of behavior patterns, can solve all of our individual and social ills is the fundamental heresy of the Enlightenment philosophy.

For the substance - dependent person, each act of use involves a series or chain of choices and behaviors mediated by a variety of cognitions (automatic thoughts, cognitive distortions, permission - giving beliefs, core beliefs / early maladaptive schemas, etc.), which interact with emotional states and past learning, strongly reinforcing «self - medicating» for emotional and existential pain.

Information to the contrary becomes filter, denied, attacked, invalidated, ignored... The mind does all it can to keep its cognitive balance, and our minds take short cuts, it's easier to filter information out than to unravel the interconnected tangle of thought, (belief) emotion, and behaviour.

When I am told not to think so much because the «plain and simple reading» of Scripture demands certain conclusions, the cognitive dissonance is excruciating.

He thought that much of what counted as neo-orthodoxy sacrificed cognitive content to revelation in favor a personal, non-cognitive revelation (Barth was exempted to a certain extent).

They will not be broadcast by PBS any time soon, however, for, whatever one thinks of their theology, they make cognitive claims that are at least worth arguing about.

They also state that reason they think we should start ealier is because of the specific cognitive bias we have to try to explain things intiutively.

«cognitive therapy» (5) and Albert Ellis» «rational emotive therapy» (6) emphasize the crucial role of thoughts and beliefs in maintaining and changing unadaptive behavior.

As for (a), very few people want to be thought of as «an offensive person» — but then generalizing from offending one or some people to making the offender GENERALLY offensive is a cognitive mistake.

In the case of the doctrine of revelation and inspiration the shift meant that the Bible and its teachings came to be viewed as the product of human cultural experience, time conditioned and relative in authority, and certainly not a suitable cognitive guide to thinking persons today.

With this important modification, it may be easier to think of the sacred canopy, then, as something other than a purely rational or cognitive philosophy of life.

In order to evade cognitive relativism, one can not but resort to an answer that takes into consideration more than only the transcendental structures of our thought.

It certainly is good to have finally found out that Christianity is nothing more than just tradition, ritual and culture and that all the things which the Bible says about God and prayer are not true — God does not speak to or lead or guide or direct anyone or put thoughts in anyone's mind or show them signs or speak to their heart or mind or tells them what to do or calls people or chooses people or has a plan for people's lives whether they are in an altered state of consciousness / transcendent state or whether they are in an unaltered cognitive state.

I'm glad I found out that God does not speak to or lead or guide or direct me or put thoughts in my mind or show me signs whether I am in an altered state of consciousness / transcendent state or whether I am in an unaltered cognitive state.

A complete occasion includes that which in cognitive experience takes the form of memory, anticipation, imagination, and thought.

Or, if you prefer philosophical examples, consider the recent debates between proponents of a unified cognitive science, a science that would demonstrate mental events to be either strictly identical with physical events or epiphenomena of them — people like Daniel Dennett and Patricia Churchland — and those who think that there is a philosophically irreducible difference between the physical and the mental — that is, people like Thomas Nagel and John Searle.

That assumes a level of cynicism that may be cultivated by a Mitt Romney, but probably not many rank - and - file conservatives, who either don't know this, or suffer from such extreme cognitive dissonance that it doesn't effect their thinking.

Yet a truly modern subject or «I» is a doubled or self - alienated center of consciousness, and is so in a uniquely Cartesian internal and radical doubt, one never decisively present in previous cognitive or philosophical thinking, although its ground had been established by Augustine's philosophical discovery of the subject of consciousness.

Formulated another way, Gestalt psychology does not give sufficient consideration to the structuring activity of the subject, which continues to produce, in addition to the forms of perception (which themselves undergo a development), new cognitive structures and especially thought structures, which in the end have little in common with perceptive figurations.

What Whitehead called the «genetic» and the «morphological» manner of thinking, Piaget summarized in the idea of the general method and interpretation of «genetic structuralism» (ESH 7); both explicitly assert that structure and genesis are interdependent: each structure, from the biological to the cognitive, is to be understood as the result of a process of formation, which conversely can only be understood as the continuous development of potential structures (BC 193; S 121).

The development of cognition in general is conceived in Piaget's genetic theory as a reconstruction of earlier forms of cognitive organization with new means and on a new level; the best known example of this development is the transformation and reconstruction of sensori - motor activity schemata into symbolic - conceptual thinking operations.

What is at issue theologically is the question of whether Hegelian or Whiteheadian thinking is the best philosophical vehicle for the contemporary expression of the cognitive meaning of the Christian faith.

And not the least claim that can he made for the Hegelian method or mode of thinking is that it is truly and fully a cognitive expression of the eschatologica1 and Christological ground of the Christian faith.

We have learned so much about the intelligence, cognitive and social, of so many animals — humpback whales, orcas, bottlenose dolphins, elephants, gray parrots, dogs, and so on — all of it quite fascinating, thought - provoking, and in many cases delightful, and it seems a cruel impoverishment of our speculative and moral imaginations to dismiss it all as a process of biomechanical stimulus and response, only accidentally resembling the workings of human consciousness.

Nor, I think, does the acknowledgment of animal consciousness truly threaten to diminish our sense of the vast gulf — cognitive, moral, creative, imaginative — separating the human world from that of even the most intelligent of animals.