Sentences with phrase «of consciousness where»

Basically flow is a state of consciousness where feelings, thoughts, concepts of time and place have been suspended.

This is a state of consciousness where people passively believe what they are told, rather than what they themselves think.

Her influence upon my work has not been triggered by a specific painting but like most cultural phenomenon, Bridget's shadow has crept onto the fringes of my consciousness where it has remained, indelible and concrete in its assertive energy.»

Although humans operate in a physically small container called the body, we are able to reach a level of consciousness where, ultimately, the whole universe is ourselves.

It is a state of consciousness where the body is completely relaxed and you as a practitioner become aware of the inner world in a systematic way by following a guided instruction.

Hypnosis is often defined as an altered state of consciousness where people become more suggestible.

«The great ones,» he says «are operating at a level of consciousness where fear doesn't exist.»

Not exact matches

We have 75 projects in and out of my consciousness, so you're juggling all day long and just trying to push those boulders up to where they need to be.

I was so cold at one point that I felt like someone who was drowning — that moment where you're in and out of consciousness and stuck in lala land.

One, the human translation is flawed, written by primitives compared to where humans stand today in greater depth of intelligence and consciousness.

Where does the «type of consciousness» come from that enables Christians to see the IMMORALITY of God's support for slavery and discriminations?

For Gilkey, the «neo» of his orthodoxy is precisely where he remained most liberal» not just his penchant for talking about biblical symbols and myths but also his conviction that the problem of historical consciousness is the context for all modern theology.

We have a great understanding of where consciousness and intelligence comes from.

And it is conscious: that is, it does not stay below the threshold of consciousness and work there unknown to the soul (as, for instance, infant baptism is thought by some to do), but comes within the field of awareness where the man can «know» it as he knows any other fact of experience.

Our special status and responsibility, however, are not limited to consciousness of our own personal bodies, or even of the human world, but extend to all embodied reality, for we are that part of the cosmos where the cosmos itself has come to consciousness.

Everywhere, as we are well aware, the lines of active phyletic development grow warm with consciousness as they approach the summit; but in one clearly - marked region at the centre of the kingdom of mammals, where the most powerful brains ever fashioned by nature are to be found, the lines glow red - hot; and already at the heart of this region there burns a point of incandescence.

This means that, boldly walking where Kant feared to tread, Hegel has identified the content of consciousness with consciousness itself, with self - consciousness, and is well on his way to giving the Kantian transcendental ego, as spirit, the «true something,» an ontological significance that Kant did not intend.

Where an important transformation seems to have taken place is at the level of the latest link in the chain, that of the «acquirement of consciousness».

Where the dialogue between this newer modern consciousness and the biblical witness is sensitively pursued, it can yield the kind of critical insight into our understanding of man which we desperately need in this age of yearning and conflict.

Where you seem to slip [off the rails all the time is your contention god and / or created consciousness exits without ANY evidence of ANY kind except AN IDEA!

Hegel, in those difficult, often cryptic, but nevertheless profoundly rewarding pages in the final sections of The Phenomenology of Spirit, where he discusses Christianity as the «absolute religion,» gives witness to the advent of an absolute form of Christianity which both negates all previous religion and promises a reconciliation of all those antinomies which have plagued human consciousness throughout its history.

As your race ascends their forms will go to a place of waiting where they will better learn to understand their new shift of consciousness.

If consciousness could exist outside of the human brain and wasn't just something produced by the brain interacting with the environment, where would it exist?

We have too often sought God logically in the «left brain» rather than expanding our use of the right hemisphere of the brain where intuitive, prayerful, loving, visual thinking occurs — where we pray, believe, love and develop a consciousness of the total mind - body - spirit relationship.

The idea here is very clear: If a person is nonreligious, then TM presents itself as being nonreligious, too, so as to meet him on his own turf; then it draws him to a «unified, monistic, cosmic God - consciousness» typical of Hinduism, never indicating in advance where he is headed.

I doubt that now, but I do predict a greater self - consciousness of a Holiness bloc of denominations grouped under the CHA, where there is already very close cooperation in such areas as publishing and preparing Christian education materials.

Here goes another try... The Universe is a chaotic mixture of matter (sub-atomic particles) and energy (motion and, light) in space time, where matter, through evolution, recombines to raise up consciousness, such as yourself.

If the occasions of the dominant society of human consciousness are spatially extended, we might wonder both where they are and how big they are.

It'll fall in line with this «group consciousness» and «we're all one» routine where, if you don't fall in line you'll have to be «removed like a cancer from the body of humanity» (her phrase, not mine).

They provide the organism, or, as Santayana puts it, the psyche (this being the power of the organism to develop and protect its form in a manner responsive to the environment) with its consciousness (symbolic rather than literal of what and where it is, and of what it is up to, but play no real part in controlling its behavior.

Here my every ounce of concentration is involved in trying to remember where I put it; every aim of the moment is directed toward drawing forth into consciousness what I know is buried in my brain somewhere and what I am confident I will uncover shortly.

We have seen that we can account for the type of situation where a general feeling tone persists in consciousness as a background for a focal point of attention.

This new consciousness has begun to shape an emerging yet coherent view of an interconnected world, where humans are inextricably linked to one another, whether we like it or not, and where all are connected to and dependent on the natural world in which we all live.

Where I would previously have been inclined to agree with Whitehead's characterization of Bergson that the intellect cart only grasp by spatializing, I now think (and have argued above) that I had failed to recognize fully the implications of the claim I had argued for in 1993 — that if there can be no intuition without intellect, and if intuition can grasp intelligible things without spatializing, then there is a sense in which the intellect, insofar as it is manifest in intuitive operations of consciousness, can grasp experience without spatializing it.

This sense of the word is best illustrated in Hosea, where the ghastly double rupture of marriage and covenant is in prophetic consciousness a fait accompli, and where the prophet draws an analogy between the relationship of husband and wife and that of Yahweh and his people.

The split between rational and mythic discourse which has characterized our recent cultural history is very dangerous for it impoverishes both modes of thought.13 It is one of the possible benefits of the current new appreciation of the meaning and function of myth that we may be able to rescue it from the realm of unconscious fantasy where it always continues to operate, often in dark and devious ways, and restore it once again to its creative role in human consciousness.

The church understood as the repository of religious consciousness, or as the apex of «Christian» civilization, or as the private club of moral rectitude, could no longer be the place where the thunder and lightning of God's grace breaks through to human beings.

It seems that where Man is concerned the specific function of education is to ensure the continued development of this personality by transmitting it to the endlessly changing mass: in other words, to extend and ensure in collective mankind a consciousness which may already have reached its limit in the individual.

Including the subjective immediacy, this «objective» immortality also includes consciousness in those cases where consciousness is the subjective form of immediacy.

It reminds me also of Peter Nagel's new book «Mind and Cosmos», heresy to some biologists and philosophers, and discussed this weekend in the National Post, where he brings in «consciousness», which seems to be the highest thing, yet completely ignored.

Essential to many types, if not all, is the belief that there is a supernormal state of consciousness in which a breakthrough of the normal limits of consciousness raises one to a dimension where a new state of being comes about.

We can not bury our head in the proverbial sand about where the collective evolution of consciousness has brought us thus far.

T he ground of being is revealed in the metaleptic relationship where the divine and being dwell together in the tension of existence is Voegelin's response to the questions of existence and being found in the philosophy of consciousness.

he ground of being is revealed in the metaleptic relationship where the divine and being dwell together in the tension of existence is Voegelin's response to the questions of existence and being found in the philosophy of consciousness.

That self - consciousness is held in abeyance by whatever decision, by whatever choice, or whatever trial where it is made to answer a summons — even that which is the appearance of the absolute — does not express the feebleness of the proof of testimony, as in Aristotle, but the finitude of the consciousness to which absolute knowledge is refused.

And what can this mean except that, like those planetary orbits which seem to traverse our solar system without remaining within it, the curve of consciousness, pursuing its course of growing complexity, will break through the material framework of Time and Space to escape somewhere towards an ultra-center of unification and wholeness, where there will finally be assembled, and in detail, everything that is irreplaceable and incommunicable in the world.

Not, it is true (at least not yet, here below) synthesis pushed to the point where it calls into being some new kind of autonomous super-center in the depths of the synthesized, but a synthesis which at least suffices to erect, as though it were a vault above our heads, a domain of interwoven consciousness, the site, support and instrument of super-vision and super-ideas.

What at the very beginning made the first man, was, as we know, the heightening of the individual consciousness to the point where it acquired the power of Reflection.

We are just beginning to see a quantum leap forward in human consciousness where the Big Picture is coming into focus in the minds of many people.

Where consciousness occurs, it appears as the subjective form of some part of the higher phases of experience.